The success rate of personal salary negotiations: A further investigation of academic pay differentials by sex
- 89 Downloads
A sample of male and female assistant professors in land grant public institutions was mailed a questionnaire regarding their past salary negotiation activities and their perceptions of the academic reward system. The survey results indicated that male and female academicians have about the same tendency to attempt a salary negotiation both for beginning salaries and for salary increases. Females were found to be as successful as the males in negotiating initial salaries and more successful in negotiating salary increases. The females and males studied also showed marked agreement on their perceptions of the academic reward system. However, females also reported feelings of pay inequality when they compared themselves to their peers, particularly peers of the opposite sex.
KeywordsSuccess Rate Assistant Professor Education Research Survey Result Public Institution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Astin, H. S., & Bayer, A. E. Sex discrimination in academe.Educational Record Spring 1972,53 101–118.Google Scholar
- Bayer, A. E., & Astin, H. S. Sex differentials in the academic reward system.Science May 1975,188 796–802.Google Scholar
- Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.Opportunities for Women in Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.Google Scholar
- Faculty salaries: 1978–79.The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 12, 1979, p. 12.Google Scholar
- Gappa, J. M., & Uehling, B. S. Women in academe: steps to greater equality. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 1, 1979,ED 169 373, pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
- Lewis, L. S.Scaling the Ivory Tower. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
- Shulenburger, D., & Whitely, W. Income consequences of the all-doctorate marriage.Research in Higher Education, 10 1979, 173–178.Google Scholar
- Tinball, M. E. Of men and research; the dominant themes in American higher education include neither teaching nor women.Journal of Higher Education, July 1976, 373–389.Google Scholar