Advertisement

The management of resistance in the application of object relations concepts in children's and adolescents' group psychotherapy

  • Edward S. Soo
Article

Abstract

Object relations concepts are applicable to child and adolescent group therapy. The author attempts to delineate areas in which developmental conflicts in object relations, emotional deprivations, traumas, and family pathologies are recapitulated in the group. To better understand the dynamics of the group and the interaction of its members, symbolic representations of the group are identified. The manifestation of pathologies is ameliorated during the process of the specific phase, and stages of the symbolic representation of the group. The role of the therapist as a “new object” in the management of individual and group resistances is illustrated.

Key words

child and adolescent group psychotherapy object relations group resistance corrective object relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Durkin, H. (1964).The group in depth. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  2. Foulkes, S. H. (1965).Therapeutic group analysis. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  3. Freud, A. (1965).Normality and pathology in childhood assessments of development. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  4. Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975).The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Schamess, G. (1986). Differential diagnosis and group structure in outpatient treatment of latency age children. In A. E. Riester & I. A. Kraft (eds.),Child group psychotherapy: Future tense New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Scheidlinger, S. (1974). On the concept of the “mother-group.”International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 24, 417–428.Google Scholar
  7. Soo, E. S. (1974). The impact of activity group therapy on a highly constricted child.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 24, 207–216.Google Scholar
  8. Soo, E. S. (1980). The impact of transference and counter-transference in activity group therapy.Group 4, (4), 27–41.Google Scholar
  9. Soo, E. S. (1983). The management of scapegoating in children's group psychotherapy. InGroup and Family-1983: An Overview M. L. Aronson & L. R. Wolberg (eds.), New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  10. Soo, E. S. (1985). Application of object relations concepts in children's group psychotherapy.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 35 37–47.Google Scholar
  11. Wolf, A. and Schwartz, E. K. (1962).Psychoanalysis in groups. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward S. Soo
    • 1
  1. 1.Tenafly

Personalised recommendations