Skip to main content
Log in

Aqueous uranyl complexes. 3. Potentiometric measurements of the hydrolysis of uranyl(VI) ion at 25°C

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Potentiometric titrations of uranyl(VI) solutions were conducted using a standard glasslcalomel electrode combination over the pH range 3 to 12 at 0.1 molkg−1 ionic strength with tetramethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate as the supporting electrolyte. The electrodes were calibrated directly on the hydrogen ion concentration scale during the initial stage of each titration. The species, UO 2+2 , (UO2)2(OH) 2+2 , (UO2)3(OH) +5 , (UO2)3(OH) 7 , (UO2)3(OH) 2−8 , and (UO2)3(OH) 4−10 identified in an earlier Raman study were compatible with the analysis of the titration data. Based on this analysis and application of the extended Debye-Hückel treatment, the polynuclear species indicated above were assigned overall formation constants at 25°C and at infinite dilution of −5.51±0.04, −15.3±0.1, −27.77±0.09, −37.65±0.14, and −62.4±0.3, respectively. The results are discussed in reference to hydrolysis quotients reported in the literature for the first three species. Formation quotients for the last two species have not been reported previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. Grenthe, J. Fuger, R. Konings, R. J. Lemire, A. B. Muller, C. Nguyen-Trung, and H. Wanner,Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. F. Baes, Jr. and R. E. Mesmer,The Hydrolysis of Cations, (Wiley, New York, 1976), pp. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Fuger, I. L. Khodakovsky, E. I. Sergeyeva, V. A. Medvedev, and J. D. Navratil,The Chemical and Thermodynamics of Actinide Elements and Compounds Part 12. The Actinide Aqueous Inorganic Complexes (IAEA, Vienna, 1992), pp. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Langmuir,Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 547 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Lemire and P. R. Tremaine,J. Chem. Eng. Data 25, 361 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Nguyen-Trung, D. A. Palmer, G. M. Begun, and R. E. Mesmer, in preparation.

  7. C. F. Baes, Jr. and N. J. Meyer,Inorg. Chem. 1, 780 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. A. Palmer and S. E. Drummond,J. Solution Chem. 17, 153 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Nguyen-Trung, G. M. Begun, and D. A. Palmer,Inorg. Chem. 31, 5280 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes,Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd edn., (Butterworths, London, 1965), p. 465.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. C. Ho and D. A. Palmer, submitted for publication.

  12. R. E. Mesmer,Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 55, 1175 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. A. Palmer, unpublished results.

  14. W. R. Busing and H. A. Levy, ORNL-Report, ORNL-TM-271 (1962).

  15. R. N. Sylva and M. R. Davidson,J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 465 (1979).

  16. P. L. Brown, private communication.

  17. K. S. Pitzer,J. Phys. Chem. 77, 268 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Liu and W. T. Lindsay,J. Solution Chem. 1, 45 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. J. Bradley and K. S. Pitzer,J. Phys. Chem. 83, 1599 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Rydberg,Ark. för Kemi,8, 113 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. L. Gustafson, C. Richard, and A. E. Martell,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 1526 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Tsymbal,Rapport, CEA-R-3479, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Grenoble (France) (1979).

  23. M. S. Caceci and G. R. Choppin,Radiochim. Acta 33, 207 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Bartusek and L. Z. Sommer,Z. Phys. Chem. Leipzig 226, 309 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Spiess, F. Arnaud-Neu, and M. Schwing-Weill,J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Letters 15, 13 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Vainiotalo and O. Makitie,Finn. Chem. Letters 102 (1981).

  27. L. Maya,Inorg. Chem. 21, 2895 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. A. Overvoll and W. Lund,Anal. Chim. Acta 143, 153 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. K. Kotvanova, A. M. Evseev, A. P. Borisova, E. A. Torchenkova, and S. V. Zakharov,Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 39, 37 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. M. King, R. B. King, A. R. Garber, M. C. Thompson, and B. R. Buchanan,Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 180, 1075 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. D. Wagman, W. H. Evans, V. B. Parker, R. H. Schumm, I. Halow, S. M. Bailey, K. L. Churney, and R. L. Nuttall,J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 11, 2 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, D.A., Nguyen-Trung, C. Aqueous uranyl complexes. 3. Potentiometric measurements of the hydrolysis of uranyl(VI) ion at 25°C. J Solution Chem 24, 1281–1291 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972833

Key Words

Navigation