Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Community dissatisfaction and perceived residential alternatives: An interactive model of the formulation of migration plans

  • Published:
Journal of population Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bogue, D.J.Internal migration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.D., Schwarzweller, H.K., & Mangalam, J.J. Kentucky mountain migration and the stem family: An American variation on a theme by Le Play.Rural Sociology, 1963,28, 48–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.A., & Moore, E.G. The intra-urban migration process: A perspective.Geografiska Annaler, Series B, 1970,52, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R.Organizational stress and individual strain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, 1971.

  • Choldin, H.M. Kinship networks in the migration process.International Migration Review, 1973,7, 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, V. Developent of a scale to rate attitude of community satisfaction.Rural Sociology, 1945,10, 246–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. Implications of non-response for the interpretation of mail questionnaire data.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1960,24, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A.Population, labor force and long swings in economic growth: The American experience. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicher, J.Social factors and social psychological explanation of nonmigration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1959.

  • Ford, T.R. The passing of provincialism. In T.R. Ford (ed.),The Southern Appalachian Region. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. On the multivariate analysis of three dichotomous variables.American Journal of Sociology, 1965,71, 290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970,65, 226–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaluzny, R. Determinants of household migration.Journal of Economic Statistics, 1975,57, 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing J., &Mueller, E. The geographic mobility of labor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research Survey Research Center, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.S A theory of migration.Demography, 1966,3, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, G.R. Life cycle career pattern and ecision to move.American Sociological Review, 1961,26, 896–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. Geographic mobility and extended family cohesion.American Sociological Review, 1960,25, 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, I.S.Migration and metropolitan growth: Two analytical models. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A.Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C.A., & Kalton, G.Survey methods in social investigation (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, E.M., DeFrancisco, D., Wood, P., Frazier, H., & Crowder, J. A psychosocial kinship model for family therapy.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1975,132, 1246–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D.V. Socio-economic aspects of migration.Social Forces, 1951,29, 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenstein, E.G. The laws of migration.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1889,15, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A.M. Distance of migration and socio-economic status of migrants.American Sociological Review, 1958,23, 420–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H.Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. New York: Glencoe Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, R., Artis, J., & Beegle, J.A. The measurement of community satisfaction and the decision to migrate.Rural Sociology, 1963,28, 279–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzweller, H.K.Career placement and economic life changes of young men from Eastern Kentucky. (Bulletin 686) Lexington: University of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr., A cost-benefit model of rural urban migration in Taiwan.Population Studies, 1971,25, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr., Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility.Demography, 1974,11, 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S. Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance.American Sociological Review, 1940,5, 845–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.S., & Kuznetz, S.S.Population redistribution and economic growth: United States, 1870–1950. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornethwaite, C.W.Internal migration in the United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toney, M.B. Length of residence, social ties,and economic opportunities.Demography, 1976,13, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census.U.S. Census of Population: 1970. General Population Characteristics. Final Report PC(1)-B50, West Virginia. Washington, D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate.Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1965,15, 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress.Journal of Social Issues, 1966,22, 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G.K. The P1P2/D hypothesis: On the intercity movement of persons.American Sociological Review, 1946,11, 667–686.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Austin Peay State University and Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, Florida

    James Alan Neff & Robert J. Constantine

Authors
  1. James Alan Neff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Constantine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neff, J.A., Constantine, R.J. Community dissatisfaction and perceived residential alternatives: An interactive model of the formulation of migration plans. Popul Environ 2, 18–32 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972599

Keywords

Search

Navigation