This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Berliner, D. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue.Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.
Berliner, D. (1989). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation.New directions for teacher assessment. Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference, Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 39–65.
Capie, W. & Ellett, C.D. (1982).The effects of assessment demand characteristics on the dependability of teacher performance measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, N.Y.
Chauvin, S.W., Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., & Naik, N. (1992).The effects of assessment demand characteristics on the generalizability of classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning: Will the real reliability coefficient please stand up? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, California.
Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1995). Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Ellett, C.D. (1990a).A new generation of classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning: Concepts, issues and controversies from pilots of the Louisiana STAR. Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D. (1990b).Interim report and initial performance standards recommendations for the Louisiana System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR). Interim Report Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D. (1991).A Rationale for a STAR Criterion-Referenced Decision Making Model. Working Paper, Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D. (1994).Technical reports, professional development program manuals, inservice modules, working papers, ancillary materials, research papers presented at meetings of professional associations, and articles published in professional journals and research monographs produced through the Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects, College of Education, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana from January 1989 through April 1994. Working Document. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D., Claudet, J.G., Loup, K.S.& Naik, N.S. (1991).Results of analyses of mastery scores and stability characteristics of the System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR) for 1990–1991 statewide certification assessments in Louisiana. Technical Report Number 21, Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D., Garland, J., & Logan, C. (1987).Content classification, synthesis and verification of eight large-scale teacher performance instruments. Louisiana Teaching Inernship Project, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S. & Chauvin, S.W. (1990).The System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR): Annotated Guide to Teaching and learning. Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., & Chauvin, S.W. (1991). Development, validity and reliability of a new generation of assessments of teaching and learning environments.Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(2), 25–39.
Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., Chauvin, S.W., & Evans, R.L. (1992).Issues, pilot procedures, and results of developing a semi-structured interview procedure to make knowledge inferences using the complete STAR assessment process. Technical Report Number 35, Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., Claudet, J.G., Lofton, G.G., & Chauvin, S.W. (1991).Results of a series of follow-up, iterative standards-setting tasks for certification of teachers using the System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR) in Louisiana: Implications for future decision-making models and procedures. Technical Report Number 30, Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Ellett, C.D., Teddlie, C., & Naik, N. (1991).The effects of “high stakes” certification demands on the generalizability and dependability of a classroom-based teacher assessment system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Evans, L., Ellett, C.D., Hill, F.H., Claudet, J.G. & Naik, N. (1991).A statewide verification study of the teaching and learning components of the System for Teaching and learning Assessment and Review (STAR). Technical Report Number 22, Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Gulliksen, H. (1950).Theory of mental tests. New York: John Wiley.
Jaeger, R.M. (1990). Setting standards on teacher certification tests. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Pubs., 295–321.
Loup, K.S., Ellett, C.D., & Chauvin, S.W. (1990).Confirmatory analyses to establish the construct validity of an observational system to assess teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mehrens, W. (1990). Combining evaluation data from multiple sources. In Millman, J. & Darling-Hammond, L. (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Pack, CA: Sage Pubs., 322–334.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R.L. (Ed.),Educational Measurement, 3rd Ed New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan Publishing Company, 13–104.
Nitko, A. (Ed.) (1991).Educational measurement: Issues and practice. 10(2).
Schoen, D.A. (1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1987). Reflecting on supervision and evaluation.The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Newton, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Tobin, K.G. (1990).External review and synthesis of the STAR nine school study and the STAR assessment document and procedures. Technical Report Number 20, Louisiana Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: College of Education, Louisiana State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Wheeling Jesuit College
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellett, C.D., Loup, K.S., Naik, N.S. et al. Issues in the application of a conjunctive/compensatory standard-setting model to a criterion-referenced, classroom-based teacher certification assessment system: A state case study. J Pers Eval Educ 8, 349–375 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972550
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972550