Journal of population

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 224–234 | Cite as

Theoretical and methodological implications of the influence of sex preferences on the fertility attitude-behavior relationship

  • Gary H. McClelland


Methodological Implication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ben-Porath, Y., & Welch, F.Chance, child traits, and choice of family size. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, Report No. R-1117-NIH-RF, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. Bumpass, L., & Westoff, C.F. The prediction of completed fertility.Demography, 1969, 6, 445–454.Google Scholar
  3. Coombs, C.H., Coombs, L.C., & McClelland, G.H. The measurement and analysis of family composition preferences.Population Studies, 1975, 29, 273–298.Google Scholar
  4. Fishbein, M.F., & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. Schuman, H., & Johnson, M.P. Attitudes and behavior.Annual Review of Psychology, 1976, 2, 161–207.Google Scholar
  6. Werner, P.D. Implications of attitude-behavior studies for population research and action.Studies in Family Planning, 1977, 8, 294–299.Google Scholar
  7. Westoff, C.F., Mishler, E.G., & Kelley, E.L. Preferences in size of family and eventual fertility twenty years after.American Journal of Sociology, 1957, 62, 491–497.Google Scholar
  8. Williamson, N.E.Sons or daughters: A cross-cultural survey of parental preferences. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary H. McClelland
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Reseach on Judgment and Policy, Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations