Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating teachers: A call for change

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Boyce, A. (1915). Methods for measuring teachers' efficiency.Fourteenth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. bloomington, IN: Public School Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E. (1986).The incompetent teacher. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, J. (1991).Evaluating classroom instruction. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S., & Schnier, C. (1982).Performance appraisal and review systems. Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbia Broadcasting System. (1990).Teacher is a cheater. New York: CBS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornett, L. (1985). Trends and emerging issues in career ladder plans.Educational Leadership, 43, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, D., & Kennedy, J. (1986). Teacher clarity.Teaching & Teacher Education, 2, 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devries, D., Morrison, A., Shullman, S., & Gerlach, M. (1981).Performance appraisal on the line. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, L., Schimmel, D., & Kelly, C. (1987).Teachers and the law. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. (1989). Effects of teacher rewards on recognition and job enrichment.Journal of Educational Research, 83, 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R., Malo, G., & Rakow, E. (1988). What we have learned from Tennessee's career ladder experience.Educational Leadership, 46, 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, A. (1990).The man who discovered quality. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, A., & Smyth, J. (1990). Toward educative forms of teacher evaluation.Educational Theory, 40, (1), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefele, D. (1981). Teacher interviews. In J. Millman (Ed.),Handbook of Teacher evaluation. Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefele D. (1989). The effects of expectancy on the evaluation of teacher clarity.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefele, D. (1992). Evaluating teachers: an alternative model.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1973).Work and the nature of man. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959).The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddle, G. (1985). Teacher evaluation—how important for effective schools? Eight messages from research.NASSP Bulletin, 69, 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988).The personnel evaluation standards: how to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauchak, D., Peterson, K., & Driscoll, A. (1985). An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practice.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, J. (1978).Evaluating teacher performance. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, D., & Colarusso, M. (1988). Improving teacher evaluation.The Education Digest, L. 13–15.

  • Latham, G., & Wexley, K. (1982).Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, E. (1983).Everything you always wanted to know about job analysis. Tampa, FL: Marimer Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lower, M. (1987). A study of principals' and teachers' perceptions and attitudes toward the evaluation of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manatt, R., & Daniels, B. (1990). Relationship between principals' ratings of teacher performance an student achievement.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, D., & Coker, H. (1987). The accuracy of principals' ratings of teacher performance and student achievement.Journal of Educational Research, 80, 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medley, D., & Coker, H., & Soar, R. (1984).Measurement-based evaluation of teacher performance: An empirical approach. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Broadcasting Company. (1990).Exposé. New York: NBC, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, J. (1986). Teacher evaluations: mission impossible.Principal, 65, 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, J. (1988). The dysfunction marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebell, M. (1990). Legal issues concerning teacher evaluation. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern, G. (1972).How to evaluate teachers: a performance objectives approach. Worthington, OH: School Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.)Handbook of teacher evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J., & Manatt, R. (1986). Teacher evaluation. In R. Berk (Ed.),Performance assessment: methods and applications. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. (1986, September). Teachers speak out about their evaluations.Learning, 58–67.

  • Van Sciver, J. (1990). Teacher dismissals.Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 318–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M., & Bernstein, H. (1984).Teacher evaluation: a study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelenak, M., & Snider, W. (1974). Teachers don't resent evaluation—if it's for the improvement of instruction.Phi Delta Kappan, 55, 570–571.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haefele, D.L. Evaluating teachers: A call for change. J Pers Eval Educ 7, 21–31 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972346

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972346

Keywords

Navigation