Skip to main content
Log in

Genotype differences in catecholamine concentrations in hypothalamus, intramedial hyperstriatum ventrale, and optic tectum of newly hatched chicks

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Neurochemical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to compare catecholamine concentrations among three brain areas of four pureline populations of visually isolated chicks. The purelines used were a commercial male line, a fertility selected line, an unselected fertility control line, and unselected White Jersey Giants. In general, male chicks had significantly larger brain weights than females. Six catecholamine-related compounds (norepinephrine, epinephrine,l-DOPA, dopamine, DOPAC, and MHPG) were measured via HPLC-ECD. No significant differences in neurochemical concentration were observed for any line or brain area due to sex of the chick. The hypothalamus (HT) contained the greatest concentration of catecholamines in all lines, followed by the intramedial hyperstriatum ventrale (IMHV) and optic tectum (OT). The HT exhibited consistent lateralization in all lines with the right HT containing ca. 30% more catecholamines than the left HT. While no consistent lateralization was observed among the other brain areas, the IMHV exhibited significantly different degrees of lateralization among the populations. Neuronal activity, as measured by MHPG:NE and DOPAC:DA ratio varied by line within each brain area. There were line differences for MHPG:NE in the HT, IMHV, and OT, while line differences for DOPAC:DA were observed in the HT. Since differences among purelines have been demonstrated in this study, care must be given to precisely define the genotype of chicks used in behavioral and neurochemical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mason, S.T. 1984.Catecholamines and Behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bateson, P.P.G., Horn, G., and Rose, S.P.R. 1975. Imprinting: correlations between behavior and incorporation of [14C]uracil into chick brain. Brain Res. 84:207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kohsaka, S., Takamatsu, K., and Tsukada, Y. 1979. Metabolic mapping of chick brain after imprinting using [14C]2-deoxyglucose technique. Brain Res. 172:539–544.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, P., Horn, G., and Bateson, P. 1981. An electron microscopic study of the chick hyperstriatum ventrale. Exp. Brain Res. 41:115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, L.J. 1982. Light experience and asymmetry of brain function in chickens. Nature 297:223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rose, S.P.R. 1991. Biochemical mechanisms involved in memory formation in the chick.In R.J. Andrew (ed.)Neural and Behavioral Plasticity: The Use of the Domestic Chick as a Model, Oxford Press, New York, (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Konishi, M., Emlen, S.T., Ricklefs, R.E., and Wingfield, J.C. 1989. Contributions of bird studies to biology. Science 246:465–472.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mason, R.J., and Rose, S.P.R. 1988. Passive avoidance learning produces focal elevation of bursting activity in the chick brain: Amnesia abolishes the increase. Behav. and Neural Biol. 49:280–292.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbs, M.E., and Ng, K.T. 1977. Psychobiology of memory: Towards a model of memory formation. Biobehav. Rev. 1:113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davies, D.C., Horn, G., and McCabe, B.J. 1983. Changes in telencephalic catecholamine levels in the domestic chick. Effects of age and visual experience. Dev. Brain Res. 10:251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graves, H.B., and Siegel, P.B. 1968. Chick's response to an imprinting stimulus: Heterosis and evolution. Science 160:329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graves, H.B., and Siegel, P.B. 1969. Bidirectional selection for responses ofGallus domesticus chicks to an imprinting situation. Anim. Behav., 17:683–691.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barbato, G.F., and Vasilatos-Younken, R. 1991. Maternal and sex-linked effects on growth in chickens. Poultry Sci. 70:in press.

  14. Kuenzel, W.J., and Masson, M. 1988. A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Chick (Gallus domesticus). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McKay, L., Bradberry, C., and Oke, A. 1984. Ascorbic acid oxidase speeds up analysis for catecholamines, indolamines and their metabolites in brain tissue using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. J. Chromatogr. 311:167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Markwell, M.A.K., Haas, S.M., Tolbert, N.E., and Bieber, L.L. 1981. Protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples: Manual and automated procedures. Methods in Enzymology 72:296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barbato, G.F. 1990. A fast HPLC analysis of catecholamines and indoleamines in avian brain tissue. J. Liq. Chromatog. 13:2553–2560.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freund, R.J., Littel, R.C., and Spector, P.C. 1986. SAS systems for linear models. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. pp. 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shanawany, M.M. 1987. Hatching weight in relation to egg weight in domestic birds. World's Poultry Sci. 43:107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anthony, N.B., Jones, D.E., Dunnington, E.A., Emmerson, D.A., and Siegel, P.B. 1991. Allometric growth and DNA, RNA and total protein of brains from White Rock chickens selected for 56-day body weight. J. Anim. Breed. and Genet. 107:in press.

  21. Adret, P., and Rogers, L.J. 1989. Sex difference in the visual projections of young chicks: a quantitative study of the thalamofugal pathway. Brain Res. 478:59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  22. House, D., Berman, E., and Carter, H.B. 1985. Description and implication for analysis of brain growth in suckling mice. Growth 49:426–438.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Callingham, B.A., and Sharman, D.F. 1970. The concentration of catecholamines in the brain of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Br. J. Pharmac. 40:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Juorio, A.V., and Vogt, M. 1967. Monoamines and their metabolites in the avian brain. J. Physiol. 189:489–518.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ciaranello, R.D., Barchas, R., Kessler, S., and Barchas, J.D. 1972. Catecholamines: Strain differences in biosynthetic enzyme activity in mice. Life Sci. 11:565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lorden, J.F., and Oltmans, G.A. 1977. Hypothalamic and pituitary catecholamine levels in genetically obese mice (obob). Brain Res. 131:162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patterson, T.A., Gilbert, D.B., and Rose, S.P.R. 1990. Pre- and post-training lesions of the intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale and passive avoidance learning in the chick. Exp. Brain Res. 80:189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kasamatsu, T., Pettigrew, J.B. and Ary, M., 1979. Restoration of visual cortical plasticity by local microperfusion of norepinephrine. J. Comp. Neurol. 185:139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hartmann, W. 1988. From Mendel to multi-national in poultry breeding. Br. Poult. Sci. 29:3–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kruzelock, R.P., Barbato, G.F. Genotype differences in catecholamine concentrations in hypothalamus, intramedial hyperstriatum ventrale, and optic tectum of newly hatched chicks. Neurochem Res 16, 105–112 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00965696

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00965696

Key Words

Navigation