Neurochemical Research

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 839–850 | Cite as

Interaction of dimeric and monomeric enkephalins with NG108-15 hybrid cells

A kinetic analysis
  • S. A. Krumins
  • R. A. Lutz
  • T. Costa
  • D. Rodbard
Original Articles


The binding of the enkephalin dimer [d-Ala2, Leu5-NH-CH2-]2 (DPE2) is characterized by (1) its high affinity for receptors on NG108-15 hybrid cells, the affinity constantK=4.7×109 M−1 is up to 8-fold that of monomers (0.6 to 1.0×109 M−1), and (2) a maximal binding capacity equal to one half that of the monomers. Kinetic studies showed that DPE2 binds with a 2-fold higher rate, k1=6.3×107 M−1min−1, than monomers (2.4 to 3.8×107 M−1min−1), and dissociates at a slower rate than monomers. Dissociation of DPE2 was consistently bi- or multiphasic but increased about 12% only after 3 hr of dissociation in the presence of a large excess of unlabeled enkephalin. The dissociation kinetics of monomers varied with enkephalin and experimental conditions used. Consistent with the value for the maximal binding capacity, the kinetic studies are interpreted in support of the hypothesis that DPE2 binds by cross-linking two subunits of one receptor.


Slow Rate Kinetic Study Binding Capacity Hybrid Cell Large Excess 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shimohigashi, Y., Costa, T., Matsuura, S., Chen, H.-C., andRodbard, D. 1982. Dimeric enkephalins display enhanced affinity and selectivity for the delta opiate receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 21:558–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krumins, S. A., Costa, T., Shimohigashi, Y., Munson, P. J., andRodbard, D. 1982. Differential effects of GTP and cations on the binding of labeled dimeric and monomeric enkephalins to neuroblastoma-glioma cell delta opiate receptors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 108:406–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, K.-J., Miller, R. J., andCuatrecasas, P. 1978. Interaction of enkephalin with opiate receptors in intact cultured cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 14:961–970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krumins, S. A., andRodbard, D. 1985. Comparative studies of the binding of dimeric and monomeric enkephalins to neuroblastoma-glioma NG108-15 cells. J. Neurochem. 45:101–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeMeyts, P., Roth, J., Neville, Jr., D. M., Gavin, III, J. R., andLesniak, M. A. 1973. Insulin interactions with its receptors: experimental evidence for negative cooperativity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 55:154–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeMeyts, P., Bianco, A. R., andRoth, J. 1976. Site-site interactions among insulin receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 251:1877–1888.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costa, T., Shimohigashi, Y., Krumins, S. A., Munson, P. J., andRodbard, D. 1982. Dimeric pentapeptide enkephalin: a novel probe of delta opiate receptors. Life Sci. 31:1625–1632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klee, W. A., andNirenberg, M. 1974. A neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cell line with morphine receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:3474–3477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, K.-J., andCuatrecasas, P. 1979. Multiple opiate receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 254:2610–2618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller, R. J., Chang, K.-J., Leighton, H. J., andCuatrecasas, P. 1978. Interaction of iodinated analogues with opiate receptors. Life Sci. 22:379–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Munson, P. J., andRodbard, D. 1980. Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal. Biochem. 107:202–239.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knott, G. D. 1979. Modellab application manual. Pages 107–109, Division of Computer Research and Technology Report, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lutz, R. A., Costa, T., Cruciani, R. A., Jacobson, A. E., Rice, K. C., Burke, Jr., T. R., Krumins, S. A., andRodbard, D. 1985. Increased affinity of dimeric enkephalins is not dependent on receptor density. Neuropeptides 6:167–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blume, A. J. 1978. Opiate binding to membrane preparations of neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells NG108-15: effects of ions and nucleotides. Life Sci. 22:1843–1852.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blume, A. J., Boone, G., andLichtshtein, D. 1979. Regulation of the neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid opiate receptors by Na+ and guanine nucleotides. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 116–174.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pryhuber, K. G., Roth, B. L., andCoscia, C. J. 1982. Demonstration of a slowly dissociating form of bovine hippocampal synaptic membrane opiate receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 83:47–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Law, P.-Y., andLoh, H. H. 1978.3H-Leu5-enkephalin specific binding to synaptic membrane-comparison with3H-dihydromorphine and3H-naloxone. Res. Commun. Chem. Path. Pharmacol. 21:409–431.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Segal, D. M., andHurwitz, E. 1977. Binding of affinity cross-linked oligomers of IgG to cells bearing Fc receptors. J. Immunol. 118:1338–1346.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Krumins
    • 1
  • R. A. Lutz
    • 1
  • T. Costa
    • 1
  • D. Rodbard
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Theoretical and Physical Biology National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthBethesda

Personalised recommendations