Goal attainment scaling: An idiosyncratic method to assess treatment effectiveness in agoraphobia

  • Edwin de Beurs
  • Alfred Lange
  • Roland W. B. Blonk
  • Peter Koele
  • Anton J. L. M. van Balkom
  • Richard Van Dyck
Article

Abstract

Goal attainment scaling (GAS) is an individually tailored way to measure treatment gains, using a highly standardized procedure. An advantage of the method is that it takes into account individual characteristics of the patients, and at the same time the data are suitable for quantitative analysis and comparable across patients. Despite the wide acceptance and use of the method in the evaluation of psychotherapy, data on its psychometric properties are rather scarce. In the current study, GAS was used as one of several outcome measures in a research project on the effectiveness of various treatments for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Guidelines for GAS are presented as well as data on the reliability and validity of the procedure. Results indicate that the procedure is reliable, valid, and sensitive to the improvement of patients during treatment. Comparison of GAS with standardized measures revealed considerable concordance, although the clinical end status of patients diverged somewhat dependent on the measure considered.

Key words

goal attainment scaling treatment changes validity panic disorder agoraphobia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
  2. Arrindell, W. A., & Ettema, J. H. M. (1986).SCL-90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator. (SCL-90: Manual for a multidimensional indicator of psychopathology). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
  4. Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., & Luber, R. F. (1983). Using the Goal Attainment Scale to measure outcome in schizophrenia.International Journal of Partial Hospitalization, 2, 33–41.Google Scholar
  5. Blonk, R. W. B., & Hondema, M. (1990).Goal attainment scaling en therapie-effect (Goal attainment scaling and treatment outcome). Unpublished master's thesis. Amsterdam: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam,Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, J. H., Rae, D. S., Thompson, J. W., Burns, B. J., Bourdon, K., Locke, B. Z., & Regier, D. A. (1990). Phobia: Prevalence and risk factors.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 25, 314–323.Google Scholar
  7. Calsyn, R. J., Tornatsky, L., & Dittmar, S. (1977). Incomplete adaptation of an innovation: The case of goal attainment scaling.Evaluation Quarterly, 4, 127–130.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation of the multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar
  9. Chambless, D. L., Caputo, G. C., Bright, P., & Gallager, R. (1984). Assessment of fear of fear in agoraphobics: The Body Sensations Questionnaire and the Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 1090–1097.Google Scholar
  10. Chambless, D. L., Caputo, G. C., Jasin, S. E., Gracely, E. J., & Williams, C. (1985). The Mobility Inventory for agoraphobia.Behavior Research and Therapy, 23, 35–44.Google Scholar
  11. Choate, R., Smith, A., Cardillo, J. E., & Thomson, L. (1981). Training in use of goal attainment scaling.Community Mental Health Journal, 17, 171–181.Google Scholar
  12. Craske, M. G., Street, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1989). Instructions to focus upon or distract from internal cues during exposure treatment of agoraphobic avoidance.Behavior Research and Therapy, 27, 663–672.Google Scholar
  13. Cytrynbaum, S., Ginath, Y., Birdwell, J., & Brandt, L. (1979). Goal attainment scaling: A critical review.Evaluation Quarterly, 3, 5–40.Google Scholar
  14. de Beurs, E., Lange, A., Blonk, R., Van Dyck, R., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & van Daal, M. (1991). De waarde van Goal Attainment Scaling voor het vaststellen van therapie-effect bij agorafobici (The value of goal attainment scaling for the assessment of treatment effect with agoraphobic patients).Gedragstherapie, 24, 235–252.Google Scholar
  15. de Beurs, E., Lange, A., Van Dyck, R., Blonk, R. W. B., & Koele, P. (1991). Behavioral assessment of avoidance in agoraphobia.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 13, 285–300.Google Scholar
  16. de Beurs, E., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., Lange, A., Van Dyck, R., & Koele, P. (1993).Treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia. I. A comparison of fluvoxamine, placebo, psychological panic management, and exposure in vivo (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  17. de Ruiter, C., Garssen, B., Rijken, H., & Kraaimaat, F. (1987).Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Revised: Dutch translation. Utrecht: Department of Psychiatry, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Derogatis, L. R. (1977).SCL-90. Administration, scoring & procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scales series. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  19. Di Nardo, P. A., O'Brien, G. T., Barlow, D. H., Waddell, M. T., & Blanchard, E. B. (1983). Reliability of DSM-III anxiety disorder categories using a new structured interview.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1070–1075.Google Scholar
  20. Emmerson, G. J., & Neely, M. A. (1988). Two adaptable, valid, and reliable data-collection measures: Goal attainment scaling and the semantic differential.Counseling Psychologist, 16, 261–271.Google Scholar
  21. Fiester, A. R., & Fort, D. J. (1978). A method of evaluating the impact of services at a comprehensive community mental health center.American Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 291–302.Google Scholar
  22. France, K. (1985). Goal attainment scaling as a therapeutic aid in crisis intervention.Crisis-Intervention, 14, 11–20.Google Scholar
  23. Gillespie, G. F., & Seaberg, J. R. (1977). Individual problem rating: A proposed scale.Administration in Mental Health, 5, 21–29.Google Scholar
  24. Heavlin, W. D., Lee-Merrow, S. W., & Lewis, V. M. (1982). The psychometric foundations of goal attainment scaling.Community Mental Health Journal, 18, 230–241.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.Google Scholar
  26. Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, S. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs.Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453.Google Scholar
  27. LaFerriere, L., & Calsyn, R. (1978). Goal attainment scaling: An effective treatment technique in short-term therapy.American Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 271–282.Google Scholar
  28. Lambert, M. J., Shapiro, B. A., & Bergin, A. E. (1986). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, A. B., Spencer, J. H., Haas, G. L., & DiVittis, A. (1987). Goal attainment scaling: Relevance and replicability in follow-up of patients.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 408–418.Google Scholar
  30. Lubin, B. (1965). Adjective checklist for the measurement of depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 57–62.Google Scholar
  31. Luteijn, F., & Bouman, T. K. (1988). De validiteit van de Beck's Depression Inventory. (The validity of Beck's Depression Inventory).Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 43, 340–343.Google Scholar
  32. Maher, C. A. (1983). Goal attainment scaling: A method for evaluating special education services.Exceptional Children, 49, 529–536.Google Scholar
  33. Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1979). Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients.Behavior Research and Therapy, 17, 263–267.Google Scholar
  34. Mintz, J., & Kiesler, D. J. (1982). Individualized measures of psychotherapy outcome. In P. C. Kendall & J. M. Butcher (Eds.),Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 491–533). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Newman, F. L. (1983). Therapist's evaluation of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert, E. R. Christensen, & S. S. DeJulio (Eds.),The assessment of psychotherapy outcome (pp. 498–536). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Watson, J. P., & Marks, I. M. (1971). Relevant and irrelevant fear in flooding: A crossover study of phobic patients.Behavior Therapy, 2, 275–293.Google Scholar
  37. Woodward, C. A., Santa-Barbara, J., Levin, S., & Epstein, N. B. (1978). The role of goal attainment scaling in evaluating family therapy outcome.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 464–476.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin de Beurs
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alfred Lange
    • 1
  • Roland W. B. Blonk
    • 1
  • Peter Koele
    • 3
  • Anton J. L. M. van Balkom
    • 2
  • Richard Van Dyck
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamWB AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of MethodologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations