Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the filtration and centrifugation methods for assaying [3H](d-ala2,d-leu5)enkephalin binding to mouse brain membranes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Neurochemical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The binding of [3H](d-ala2,d-leu5)enkephalin (DADLE) to mouse brain membranes was studied via rapid filtration with GF/C filters and via the centrifugation method. The amount of specific binding determined by filtration was found to be dependent on the length of time between the initiation of vacuum and the actual time of filtration. Vacuum strength alone also significantly affected the amount of specifically bound [3H]DADLE measured by filtration. The centrifugation method increased the number of experimentally determined binding sites when compared to the filtration method. The difference in the number of binding sites was only partially attributable to passage of binding material through the GF/C filter. The ability of morphine to displace [3H]DADLE was also found to differ slightly between the two methods. These data indicate that centrifugation is a better method of determining the binding parameters of [3H]DADLE in mouse brain membrane preparations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang, K. J. andCautrecasas, P. 1979. Multiple opiate receptors: Enkephalins and morphine bind to receptors of different specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 254:2610–2618.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, K. J., Hazum, E., andCautrecasas, P. 1980. Possible role of distinct morphine and enkephalin receptors in mediating the actions of benzomorphan drugs (putative κ and σ agonists). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 77:4469–4473.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gillan, M. G. C., Kosterlitz, H. W., andPaterson, S. J. 1980. Comparison of the binding characteristics of tritiated opiates and opioid peptides. Br. J. Pharmacol. 70:481–490.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gillan, M. G. C., andKosterlitz, H. W. 1982. Spectrum of μ, δ and κ binding sites in homogenates of rat brain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 77:461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hung, C. R., Hong, J. S., andBondy, S. C. 1982. The prevention of an artifact in receptor binding assay by an improved technique. Life Sci. 30:1713–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kosterlitz, H. W., Paterson, S. S., andRobson, L. E. 1981. Characterization of the κ-subtype of the opiate receptor in the guinea pig brain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 73:939–949.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Munson, P. J., andRodbard, D. 1980. LIGAND: A versatile approach for characterization of ligand binding systems. Anal. Biochem. 107:735–744.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeiffer, A., andHerz, A. 1982. Discrimination of three opiate receptor binding sites with the use of a computerized curve-fitting technique. Mol. Pharmacol. 21:266–271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, R.W., Vaught, J.L. Comparison of the filtration and centrifugation methods for assaying [3H](d-ala2,d-leu5)enkephalin binding to mouse brain membranes. Neurochem Res 8, 1547–1556 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964156

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964156

Keywords

Navigation