Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching a chained task with a simultaneous prompting procedure

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simultaneous prompting, a type of antecedent prompt and test procedure, was used to teach the chained task of making juice from a frozen concentrate using a pictorial recipe to four elementary-aged students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Using a multiple probe design, all students acquired the task and maintained the behavior with at least 85% accuracy up to 60 days after training was terminated. In addition, students generalized the skill across settings and materials. The students' ability to expressively identify the words shown on the recipe cards was tested prior to and after training. Although not directly trained, three of the four students increased their ability to read the words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example.Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters.Journal of ihe Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, D. L., & Tawney, J. W. (1984). Dependent measures and measurement systems. In J. W. Tawney & D. L. Gast (Eds.),Single subject research in special education (pp. 112–141), Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, A. N., & Schuster, J. W. (1992). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching expressive word recognition to preschool children.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. G., Schuster, J. W., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching chained skills in a non-school setting using a divided half instructional format.Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarland-Smith, J., Schuster, J. W., & Stevens, K. B. (1993). Using simultaneous prompting to teach expressive object identification to preschoolers with developmental delays.Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, U. C., & Test, D. W. (1989). A comparison of constant time delay and most-to-least prompting in teaching laundry skills to students with moderate retardation.Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandknop, P. A., Schuster, J. W., Wolery, M., & Cross, D. P. (1992). The use of an adaptive device to teach students with moderate mental retardation to select lower priced grocery items.Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W. Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Guiltinan, S. (1988). The effectiveness of a constant time-delay procedure to teach chained responses to adolescents with mental retardation.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W., & Griffen, A. K. (1990). Using time delay with task analyses.Teaching Exceptional Children, 22 (4), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W., Griffen, A. K., & Wolery, M. (1992). Comparison of simultaneous prompting and constant time delay procedures in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation.Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, M. E., & Gast, D. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedure to the instruction of the severely handicapped.The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6 (3), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L., & Merrill, M. (1973).Stanford-Binel Intelligence Scale. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinzierl, C. L., & Schuster, J. W. (1993).A comparison of accepting specific versus functional student responses when training chained tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., & Holcombe, A. (1991).Instructive feedback: Increasing opportunities for learning through the addition of incidental information. Pittsburgh, PA: Early Childhood Intervention Program, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weschler, D. (1974).Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children — Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992).Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, D. L., & Griffen, A. K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompt in teaching chained tasks.Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Werts, M. G., & Cipolloni, R. M. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback.Early Education and Development, 4, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuster, J.W., Griffen, A.K. Teaching a chained task with a simultaneous prompting procedure. J Behav Educ 3, 299–315 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961557

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961557

Key words

Navigation