Interpretive dilemmas created by the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory 2 (MMPI-2)
- 50 Downloads
While the new MMPI-2 has the potential to provide more and better clinically relevant information than its predecessor, its introduction also creates several important problems for clinicians and researchers. In particular, the new norms and the use of uniform (rather than linear) T-scores result in the same raw scores on the two tests yielding clinical profiles that can be quite different, both qualitatively and quantitatively. These differences can result in difficulty in MMPI-2 profile interpretation when the user is relying on MMPI interpretive strategies. This paper addresses these concerns and offers some temporary remedial strategies.
Key wordsMinnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) MMPI objective personality assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Applezweig, M. H. (1953). Educational levels and Minnesota Multiphasic profiles.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 575–581.Google Scholar
- Ben-Porath, W. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1989). Psychometric stability of rewritten MMPI items.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 645–653.Google Scholar
- Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989).Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An administrative and interpretative guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Colligan, R. C., Osborne, D., Swenson, W. M., & Offord, K. P. (1983).The MMPI: A contemporary normative study. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Pancoast, D. L., & Archer, R. P. (1989). Original adult MMPI norms in normal samples: A review with implications for future developments.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 376–395.Google Scholar