Advertisement

Interpretive dilemmas created by the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory 2 (MMPI-2)

  • Donald S. Strassberg
Article

Abstract

While the new MMPI-2 has the potential to provide more and better clinically relevant information than its predecessor, its introduction also creates several important problems for clinicians and researchers. In particular, the new norms and the use of uniform (rather than linear) T-scores result in the same raw scores on the two tests yielding clinical profiles that can be quite different, both qualitatively and quantitatively. These differences can result in difficulty in MMPI-2 profile interpretation when the user is relying on MMPI interpretive strategies. This paper addresses these concerns and offers some temporary remedial strategies.

Key words

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2 (MMPI-2) MMPI objective personality assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alley, G. R., Snider, B., Forsyth, R. A., & Opitz, E. (1974). Comparative parental MMPI protocols of children evaluated at a child development clinic.Psychological Reports, 35, 1147–1154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Applezweig, M. H. (1953). Educational levels and Minnesota Multiphasic profiles.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 575–581.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Porath, W. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1989). Psychometric stability of rewritten MMPI items.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 645–653.Google Scholar
  4. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989).Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An administrative and interpretative guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Colligan, R. C., Osborne, D., Swenson, W. M., & Offord, K. P. (1983).The MMPI: A contemporary normative study. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  6. Pancoast, D. L., & Archer, R. P. (1989). Original adult MMPI norms in normal samples: A review with implications for future developments.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 376–395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald S. Strassberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, 502 SBSUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations