Skip to main content
Log in

The factor structure of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R): Some statistical considerations

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to Zuckerman's comments on my factor analyses of the MAACL-R, I focus on the statistical issues of the cutoff criterion for factor loadings and the evidence for the discriminant validity of the five-factor solution. Based upon the conclusions I draw in these two areas, I recommend that researchers either (a) use the two factor solution to the MAACL-R represented in the summary scores of Dysphoria and Positive Affect + Sensation Seeking or (b) include all MAACL-R scales in their studies and analyze their data to determine whether it is statistically appropriate to report results from a single scale (A, D, H, PA, or SS) rather than from the summary scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Comrey, A. L. (1973).A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsley, J. (1990). Dimensionality of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised: A comparison of factor analytic procedures.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, B., Zuckerman, M., Hanson, P. G., Armstrong, T., Rinck, C. M., & Seever, M. (1986). Reliability and validity of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 8, 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook, S. C., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study.Psychological Bulletin, 106, 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma, & J. D. Maser (Eds.),Anxiety and anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood.Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1990). Broad or narrow affect score for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List? Comment on Hunsley's “Dimensionality of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised”.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., & Rinck, C. M. (1983). Construction of the new scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List.Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 5, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunsley, J. The factor structure of the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R): Some statistical considerations. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 12, 99–101 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960457

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960457

Key words

Navigation