Journal of Genetic Counseling

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 71–80 | Cite as

The future of genetics in public health

  • F. John Meaney


During the 1980s, we have witnessed an erosion in federal and state funding for the coordination of genetic services in state health departments. As this decade begins, the federal budget for the support of the national genetics program is less than half of the total available in 1980. In addition, priorities in state maternal and child health programs have changed, and genetic services have often received lower rankings aside of programs to improve prenatal care and to address problems such as teenage pregnancy. Clearly we are at a critical point for the future of genetics programs in the public health arena. Fortunately, despite the problems with funding and priority setting, important coalitions have been built during the past decade and continued advances in medical genetics have made it difficult for public health officials to ignore the potential impact of genetic services. Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services (CORN) and the regional genetic services networks have provided opportunities for interaction and coordination between genetic services providers and public health officials that had not been available to any significant extent. The full potential of these coalitions has yet to be realized, but efforts in data collection, development of national guidelines and standards, and information sharing and networking have already had an influence on state genetic services programs. Continuing research on the genetics of chronic diseases and the influence of discoveries in molecular genetics will undoubtedly broaden the current scope of state public health programs in genetics, which all too often have been limited to newborn screening and administration of grants for genetic services. The regional and national genetic services programs should be strengthened and appropriate training programs should be developed in Schools of Public Health to provide the expertise and leadership that will be needed to guide the future of genetics in public health.

Key words

genetic services public health regional networks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amato RS (1985) Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services. Report of a Meeting Held July 8–9, 1985, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. American Bar Foundation (1985) Legal Liability and Quality Assurance in Newborn Screening.Google Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association (1987) Position Paper: Genetics and Public Health.Google Scholar
  4. Black RB, Weiss JO (1989) Gaps in services: Patient/family perspective.Maryland Med J 38:933–937.Google Scholar
  5. Consumers Union (1990) The telltale gene.Consumer Reports 55:483–488.Google Scholar
  6. Dobzhansky T (1962)Mankind Evolving. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp 40–46.Google Scholar
  7. Meaney FJ (1990) Medical Genetics Education for Public Health Professionals. Presentation in Workshop titled “Human Genetics Education” at the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics.Google Scholar
  8. Meaney FJ, Chang SP (1991) Survey of stale genetic services programs in the Uniled States (abstract).Am J Hum Genet Suppl 49:322.Google Scholar
  9. Rapp R (1988) Chromosomes and communication: The discourse in genetic counseling.Med Anthropol Quart, NS 2:143–157.Google Scholar
  10. Reed T, Meaney FJ (1988) Birth defects registries: A survey of state programs.Indiana Med 81:232–237.Google Scholar
  11. Schull WJ, Hanis CL (1990) Genetics and public health in the 1990s.Annu Rev Pub Health 11:105–125.Google Scholar
  12. U.S. DHHS (1984) Summary Report: Future Directions of the National Genetics Program Workshop.Google Scholar
  13. Walker AP, Scott JA, Biesecker BB, Conover B, Blake W, Djurdjinovic L (1990) Report of the 1989 Asilomar meeting on education in genetic counseling.Am J Hum Genet 46:1223–1230.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. John Meaney
    • 1
  1. 1.Arizona Department of Health ServicesOffice of Risk Assessment and Investigation, Division of Disease PreventionPhoenix

Personalised recommendations