Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical issues in genetic counseling: A comparison of M.S. counselor and medical geneticist perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

New technologies available in the field of medical genetics have increased the importance of responsible ethical decision-making among genetic counselors. A 1985 national survey of M.D. and Ph.D. genetic counselors assessed ethical attitudes using case scenarios designed to simulate dilemmas faced in genetic counseling (Wertz and Fletcher, 1988b). The current study focuses on attitudes of M.S. genetic counselors using similar scenarios, allowing for effective comparisons. M.S. counselors were more willing than M.D. and Ph.D. counselors to maintain patient confidentiality when screening for Huntington's Disease and occupational diseases, and a greater number would agree to counsel patients pursuing prenatal testing for sex selection. A majority of M.S. counselors would disclose an XY karyotype to a phenotypically female patient. M.S. counselors reasoned that respect for patient autonomy and patient confidentiality justified their decisions in many cases. The importance of these principles is discussed and questioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Childress JF (1990) The place of autonomy in bioethics.Hastings Cent Rep 20(1):12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JC, Berg K, Tranoy KE (1985) Ethical aspects of medical genetics.Clin Genet 27:199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson JR, Swazey JP, Scotch NA (1981)Reproductive Pasts, Reproductive Futures: Genetic Counseling and Its Effectiveness. Birth Defects: Original Article Series (Vol. XVII, No. 4). Alan R Liss, pp 1–14, 37–44.

  • Wertz DC Fletcher JC (1988a) Attitudes of genetic counselors: A multinational survey.Am J Hum Genet 42:592–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz DC Fletcher JC (1988b) Ethics and medical genetics in the United States: A national survey.Am J Med Genet 29:815–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz DC, Fletcher JC (1989) Moral reasoning among medical geneticists in eighteen nations.Theoret Med 10(2):123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarborough M, Scott JA, Dixon LK (1989) The role of beneficence in clinical genetics: Non-directive counseling reconsidered.Theoret Med 10(2):139–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina

    Deborah F. Pencarinha, Janice G. Edwards & Robert G. Best

  2. Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina

    Nora K. Bell

Authors
  1. Deborah F. Pencarinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nora K. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Janice G. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert G. Best
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pencarinha, D.F., Bell, N.K., Edwards, J.G. et al. Ethical issues in genetic counseling: A comparison of M.S. counselor and medical geneticist perspectives. J Genet Counsel 1, 19–30 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960081

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960081

Key words

Search

Navigation