Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioural studies in different strains of mice and the problem of heterosis

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Significant differences between strains were found for open field activity and emotionality, exploratory activity, initial reaction to shock, conditioned avoidance learning, and weight for three inbred strains (Balb/c, C57Bl and C3H), such that the heaviest strain (Balb/c) was the least active and most emotional in the open field, gave the lowest score for exploratory activity and longest reaction to shock times, and was the poorest at conditioned avoidance learning.

The hybrids from crosses with C57Bl tended more towards complete dominance and overdominance than did the Balb/c × C3H hybrid, probably because the Balb/c and C3H strains have some common ancestry.

Heterosis was most marked for traits involving exploration or learning. Variability of the hybrids for these traits was often lower than the parents, i.e. they showed behavioural homeostasis. For other traits variability of the hybrids tended towards the parent whose genotype was dominant for the trait.

Of the non-genetic factors studied, age and litter size were found to have the greatest effect on the behavioural traits. Parity was found only to affect weight. Sex differences were found for weight and emotionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeelen J. H. F.van (1966). Effects of genotype on mouse behaviour,Anim. Behav. 14: 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett S. A. & S. G. Scott (1964). Behavioural “vigour” in inbred and hybrid mice.Anim. Behav. 12: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst P. L. & G. Bignami (1965). Correlative effects of psychogenetic selection: A study of the Roman high and low avoidance strains of rats.Behav. Res. Ther. 2: 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruell J. H. (1964a). Heterotic inheritance of wheel running in mice.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 58: 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bcruell J. H. (1964b). Inheritance of behavioral and physiological characters of mice and the problem of heterosis.Am. Zool. 4: 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspari, E. (1958). Genetic basis of behavior. InBehavior and Evolution. Eds. A. Roe and G. G. Simpson, Yale University Press pp. 103–127.

  • Collins R. L. (1964). Inheritance of avoidance conditioning in mice: A diallel study.Science 143: 1188–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defries J. C., J. P. Hegmann & M. W. Weir (1966). Open field behavior in mice: Evidence for a major gene effect mediated by the visual system.Science 154: 1577–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellens A. A., A. N. Mouravieff & M. J. Heuts (1966). The age of reproduction as a factor of transmissible divergences in learning ability in the mouse.Experientia 22: 186–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller J. L. & W. R. Thompson (1960). Behavior Genetics. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson N. D. (1967). Prior treatment effects on open field behaviour of mice—a genetic analysis.Anim. Behav. 15: 364–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry K. R. & K. Schlesinger (1967). Effects of the albino and dilute loci on mouse behavior.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 63: 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe W. L. & P. A. Parsons (1967). Genotype and environment in the determination of minor skeletal variants and body weight in mice.J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 17: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakway J. S. (1959). Inheritance of patterns of mating behaviour in the male guinea pig.Anim. Behav. 7: 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M. B. (1966). On the evaluation of variability in isogenic hybrids.Biometrics 22: 623–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, N. J. & J. Werboff (1964). Neonatal experience and later behavior in mice.Jackson Lab. 36th Annual Report, pp. 64–65.

  • Lerner I. M. (1954). Genetic Homeostasis. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine S. (1957). Infantile experience and resistance to physiological stress.Science 126: 405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M. W. (1963). Early developmental stress and later behavior.Science 141: 824–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClearn G. E. (1961). Genotype and mouse activity.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 54: 674–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oortmerssen G. A.van & J. A. Beardmore (1967). An age factor affecting variance of a behavioural character in F1 hybrids between inbred lines of the house mouse.Experientia 23: 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P. A. (1964). Parental age and the offspring.Quart. Rev. Biol. 39: 258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P. A. (1967a). The Genetic Analysis of Behaviour. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons P. A. (1967b). Behavioural homeostasis in mice.Genetica 38: 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ressler R. H. (1966). A voidance conditioning in mice: prenatal influence of mother's treatment before mating.Am. Zool. 6: 295 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson W. R. (1953). The inheritance of behavior: behavioral differences in fifteen mouse strains.Canad. J. Psychol. 7: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, A., Parsons, P.A. Behavioural studies in different strains of mice and the problem of heterosis. Genetica 41, 65–87 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958895

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958895

Keywords

Navigation