Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic analysis ofloboid-ophthalmoptera, a homoeotic strain inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A homoeotic strain in which wing-like outgrowths are produced from the eye region was investigated. The actual wing nature of the malformation was confirmed. Genetically, this homoeotic character depends on the presence of an eye-reducing factor,loboid (ld; 3–102), and of modifier genes. One important sex-linked modifier, probably located at 1–5±, is thought to be the main factor underlying the homoeotic effect. It is designated asopht (ophthalmoptera), and the mutant strain asld-opht Kobel (1968), assuming a specific allele ofld with homoeotic effect, originally described this strain under the nameld oph. It is shown that inld-opht, theld factor can be replaced byDfd r-L (3–47.5) without irrevokably losing the homoeotic effect.

Penetrance and expressivity ofopht are very variable and subject to genetic and environmental changes, and they readily respond to selection. Such properties are common to all homoeotic mutants. The phenomenon of homoeosis is interpreted in terms of allotypic differentiations resulting from a switching of development into other epigenetic pathways. This switching is perhaps due to an altered rate of proliferation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astauroff B. L. (1930). Analyse der erblichen Störungsfälle der bilateralen Symmetrie im Zusammenhang mit der selbständigen Variabilität ähnlicher Strukturen.Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. Vererbungslehre 55: 183–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubele A. M. (1968). Morphological nature of the “palp-like” structure inerupi mutants.DIS 43: 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkaschina E. I. (1929). Ein Fall der Erbhomöosis (die Genovariation “aristopedia”) beiDrosophila melanogaster.Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 115: 448–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson W. (1894). Materials for the study of variation. McMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B. & T. H. Morgan (1923). The third chromosome group of mutant characters ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Instn. Wash. Publ. 327.

  • Di Pasquale A. (1952). Su due nuovi alleli dello stesso locus del III0 cromosoma diDrosophila melanogaster Meig.Rc. Inst. lomb. Sci. Lett. III 85: 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards J. W. & E. J. Gardner (1962). Genetic analysis of aDrosophila melanogaster mutant phenotypically similar to the fourth chromosomeeyeless mutants. (Abstr.).Genetics 47: 951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards J. W. & E. J. Gardner (1966). Genetics of theeyes-reduced mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster with special reference to homoeosis and eyelessness.Genetics 53: 785–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzmann E. V. & C. P. Haskins (1939). Note of modifications in the morphogenesis ofDrosophila melanogaster occurring under neutron bombardment.Amer. Natur. 73: 470–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etkin W. & L. G. Livingston (1947). A probability interpretation of the concept of homology.Amer. Natur. 81: 468–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Bellido A. (1966). Influencia del genotipo sobre las afinidades celulares en combinados de organos imaginales deDrosophila melanogaster.Portug. Acta biol. A 9: 308–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring W. (1966). Ubertragung und Änderung der Determinationsqualitäten in Antennenscheiben-Kulturen vonDrosophila melanogaster.J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 15: 77–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesbrecht, W. (1910). Stomatopoden I. Fauna und Flora des Golfs von Neapel33.

  • Glass B. (1944). The effect of x-rays upon the action of a specific gene inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 29: 436–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass B. (1957). In pursuit of a gene.Science 126: 683–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt E. & A. Lederman-Klein (1958). Reoccurrence of a forgotten homeotic mutant inDrosophila.J. Hered. 49: 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R. (1940). The material basis of evolution. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven (Conn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R. B. (1945). The structure ofpodoptera, a homoeotic mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster.J. Morph. 77: 71–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R. B., A. Hannah & L. K. Piternick (1951). Thepodoptera effect inDrosophila melanogaster.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 55: 67–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R. B. & L. K. Piternick (1957). The genetic background of chemically induced phenocopies inDrosophila.J. exp. Zool. 135: 127–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon C. (1936). The frequency of heterozygosis in freeliving populations ofDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila subobscura.J. Genet. 33: 25–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn E. (1966). Konstanz, Wechsel und Typus der Determination und Differenzierung in Zellen aus männlichen Genitalanlagen vonDrosophila melanogaster nach Dauerkultur in vivo.Develop. Biol. 13: 424–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst C. (1896). Uber die Regeneration von antennenähnlichen Organen an Stelle von Augen.Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 2: 544–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskowitz I. H. (1949).Hexaptera, a homoeotic mutant inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 34: 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs C. L. (1944). Concepts of homology and analogy.Amer. Natur. 78: 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobel H. R. (1968). Homoeotische Flügelbildung durch dasloboid-Allel“ophthalmoptera” (ldoph) beiDrosophila melanogaster.Genetica 39: 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kříženecký J. (1913). Über Restitutionserscheinungen an Stelle von Augen beiTenebrio-Larven nach Zerstörung der optischen Ganglien.Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 37: 629–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger H. (1959). Determinationsmosaike aus kombiniert implantierten Imaginalscheiben vonEphestia kühniella Zeller.Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 151: 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman-Klein, A. (1962). The morphology and physiological genetics of a homoeotic mutant inDrosophila melanogaster. Thesis, Hebrew Univ., Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis E. B. (1964). Genetic control and regulation of pathways, 231–252. In: The role of chromosomes in development, ed.: M. Locke:Symp. Devel. Growth 23, Acad. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. L. & E. H. Grell (1967). Genetic variations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Instn. Wash. Publ. 627.

  • Ouweneel W. J. (1969a). Morphology and development ofloboid-ophthalmoptera, a homoeotic strain inDrosophila melanogaster.Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 164: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouweneel W. J. (1969b). Influence of environmental factors on the homoeotic effect ofloboid-ophthalmoptera inDrosophila melanogaster.Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 164: 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyer B. & E. Hadorn (1965). Zum Manifestationsmuster der Mutante “multiple wing hairs” (mwh) vonDrosophila melanogaster.Arch. Julius Klaus-Stift. Vererb.-Forsch. 40: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts P. (1964). Mosaics involvingaristapedia, a homoeotic mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 49: 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang, J. H. (1961). Environmental control of mutant expression, 91–110. In: Insect polymorphism,Symp. Roy. Entom. Soc. London 1.

  • Schläpfer T. (1963). Der Einfluss des adulten Wirtsmilieus auf die Entwicklung von larvalen Augenantennenimaginalscheiben vonDrosophila melanogaster.Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org. 154: 378–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguy E. (1950). La biologie des diptères. In: Encyclopédie Entomologique, Sér. A, XXVI, Lechevalier, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valadares M. (1937). Déclanchement d'une haute mutabilité chez une lignée pure deDrosophila melanogaster.Rev. Agron. 25: 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villee C. A. (1942a). The phenomenon of homoeosis.Amer. Natur. 76: 494–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villee C. A. (1942b). A study of hereditary homoeosis: the mutanttetraltera inDrosophila melanogaster.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 49: 125–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt M. (1947). Zur labilen Determination der Imaginalscheiben vonDrosophila. III. Analyse der Manifestierungsbedingungen sowie der Wirkungsweise der zu Antennen- und Palpusverdoppelungen führenden GenmutationDeformed-recessive-Lüers (Dfd r-L).Biol. Zbl. 66: 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. H. (1939). Genes as evocators in development.Symp. Devel. Growth (Suppl. toGrowth)1: 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. H. (1942a). Growth and determination in the development ofDrosophila.Nature 149: 264–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. H. (1942b). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters.Nature 150: 563–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. H. (1942c). Some developmental effects of x-rays inDrosophila.J. exp. Biol. 19: 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. H. (1966). Principles of development and differentiation. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C. H. & R. W. Pilkington (1943). The structure and development of four mutant eyes inDrosophila.J. Genet. 43: 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimm G. G. (1951). An analysis of growth abnormalities associated with the eye-mutantLobe inDrosophila melanogaster.J. exp. Zool. 116: 289–319.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Aided by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (Z.W.O.).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ouweneel, W.J. Genetic analysis ofloboid-ophthalmoptera, a homoeotic strain inDrosophila melanogaster . Genetica 41, 1–20 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00958890

Keywords

Navigation