Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of salts Cs2B10H10 and Cu2B10H10 by X-ray spectroscopy methods

  • Brief Communications
  • Published:
Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Division of chemical science Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    From a comparison of the\(CuL_{\alpha _{1, 2} } \) and BKα, spectra of Cu2B10H10 it follows that the upper valence MO in this salt are build mainly from Cu+ 3d orbitals (G and H maxima). The deeper MO are represented mainly by the 2p orbitals of the B atoms. The BKα and CuL\(CuL_{\alpha _{1, 2} } \), overlap of the spectra indicates that MO of the mixed p-d type are present, which can be explained by the participation of the Cu+ 3p orbitals in forming the chemical bond.

  2. 2.

    A charge transfer of ∼0.5 e from the B10H10 2− ion to the Cu+ ions occurs in the salt Cu2B10H10 when compared with Cs2B10H10.

  3. 3.

    Two vertex and four equatorial B atoms of the anion participate in forming the bond in Cu2B10H10. The equatorial atoms undergo the greatest change in the bond energy, which can be explained by assuming their participation in the simultaneous formation of both the three-center B-Cu-B bond and the B-H-Cu bridge bond.

  4. 4.

    From an estimate of the charge value of the Cu+ ion and the x-ray spectral data it can be postulated that the bond with Cu2B10H10 bears a partially covalent character, which is caused by the donor-acceptor mechanism for the interaction of the Cu ion with the B10H10 2− ion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature cited

  1. R. D. Dobrott and W. N. Lipscomb, J. Chem. Phys.,37, 1779 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. E. Paxson, M. F. Hawthorne, L. D. Brown, and W. N. Lipscomb, Inorg. Chem.,13, 2772 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. N. Greenwood and I. M. Ward, Chem. Soc. Rev.,3, 231 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Volkov, I. S. Posnaya, and Z. A. Grankina, Izv. Sibirsk. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim.,1977, 115.

  5. V. D. Yumatov, Dissertation, INKh SO AN SSSR, Novosibirsk (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. N. Mazalov, G. F. Khudorozhko, A. P. Sadovskii, A. V. Nikolaev, E. S. Gluskin, G. A. Lugovoi, L. G. Pel'man, I. G. Larionov, and A. F. Neermolov, Izv. Sibirsk. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser, Khim.,1975, No. 4, 133.

  7. D. A. Allison, C. Johansson, C. J. Allan, U. Gelius, and H. Siegbahn, J. Electron Spectrosc.,1, 269 (1972/73).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. A. Carlson, Photoelectron and Auger Spectroscopy, Plenum Publ. (1975).

  9. D. R. Armstrong, P. G. Perkins, and J. J. P. Stewart, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.,5, 627 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 7, pp. 1640–1643, July, 1982.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volkov, V.V., Il'inchik, E.A., Mazalov, L.N. et al. Comparative study of salts Cs2B10H10 and Cu2B10H10 by X-ray spectroscopy methods. Russ Chem Bull 31, 1460–1462 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00954177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00954177

Keywords

Navigation