Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 207–211 | Cite as

Applied quantitative behavior analysis: A view from the laboratory

  • Michael Davison
Commentary

Keywords

Health Psychology Behavior Analysis Quantitative Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Davison, M. (1988). Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 339–349.Google Scholar
  4. Davison, M., & Jenkins, P. E. (1985). Stimulus discriminability, contingency discriminability, and schedule performance.Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 77–84.Google Scholar
  5. Davison, M., & McCarthy, D. (1988).The matching law: A research review. NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of theExperimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.Google Scholar
  7. Logue, A. W., & Chavarro, A. (1987). Effect on choice of absolute and relative values of reinforcer delay, amount, and frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 280–291.Google Scholar
  8. Luce, R. D. (1959).Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Martens, B. K. (1992). Contingency and choice: The importance of matching theory for classroom instruction.Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 121–137.Google Scholar
  10. McDowell, J. J., & Wood, H. M. (1985). Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein'sk as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 183–192.Google Scholar
  11. McDowell, J. J., & Wood, H. M. (1984). Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of response-force requirements.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 61–73.Google Scholar
  12. Warren-Boulton, F. R., Silberberg, A., Gray, M., & Ollom, R. (1985). Reanalysis of the equation for simple action.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 265–277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Davison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations