Skip to main content
Log in

School reform disorder: Alternative audience responses to nonsense

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neither general education nor special education now offers appropriate and therapeutic treatment to all children and youth with emotional or behavioral disorders. Substantial improvements are needed in both general and special education, but the needed changes may not be those suggested by many proponents of school reform. Some suggested reforms are tenuously connected to reality in ways that suggest comedic intent or thought disorder, yet audiences typically respond as if these suggestions were both serious and rational. The disorder of school reform may be as much a problem of inappropriate audience response as it is a matter of nonsensical suggestions. One possible response to serious but highly questionable suggestions for reform is articulation of postulates on which a comprehensive educational service delivery system might be based. I present eight such postulates and correlates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blount, W. F., & Kean, T. H. (1991, August 19).Designs for a new generation of American schools: A request for proposals. Arlington, VA: New American Schools Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaten, S., Kauffman, J. M., Braaten, B., Polsgrove, L., & Nelson, C. M. (1988). The regular education initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders.Exceptional Children, 55, 21–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bracey, G. W. (1991). Why can't they be like we were?Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 104–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C. C., Huelskamp, R. M., & Woodall, T. D. (1991, May 10).Perspectives on education in America: Annotated briefing — third draft. Albuquerque, NM: Systems Analysis Department, Sandia National Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feniak, C. A. (1988). Labelling in special education: A problematic issue in England and Wales. International Journal of Special Education, 3, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1991). Framing the REI debate: Abolitionists versus conservationists. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 241–255). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1989).The yoke of special education: How to break it. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process.Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. (1990).Teachers for our nation's schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., Lloyd, J. W., & McKinney, J. D. (Eds.) (1988). Questions about the regular education initiative.Journal of Learning Disabilities,21(1) [special issue].

  • Hocutt, A. M., Martin, E. W., & McKinney, J. D. (1991). Historical and legal context of mainstreaming. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues and models (pp. 17–24). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. (1989). The regular education initiative as Reagan-Bush education policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard-to-teach.Journal of Special Education, 23, 256–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. (1991). Restructuring in sociopolitical context: Reservations about the effects of current reform proposals on students with disabilities. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative Perspectives on concepts. issues, and models (pp. 57–66). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (in press). Toward a comprehensive service delivery system: The necessity of identity, focus, and authority for special education and other compensatory programs. In J. I. Goodlad & T. C. Lovilt (Eds.),Integrating general and special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill Macmillan.

  • Kauffman, J. M., & Trent, S. C. (1991). Issues in service delivery for students with learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.),Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 465–481). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B. K. (1988). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 19–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1987). Capable of achievement and worthy of respect: Education for handicapped students as if they were full-fledged human beings.Exceptional Children, 54, 69–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1991). Restructuring for quality. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 43–57). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morine-Dershimer, G. (1989, Fall). Standing in the shadows at the education summit.Teaching and Teacher Education Newsletter, 1.

  • National Center on Education and the Economy. (1989).To secure our future. Rochester, NY: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock Hill Working Group. (1991). Problems and promises in special education and related services for children and youth with emotional or behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders, 16, 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. C. (1991). Classification and labeling. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 29–41). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmel, M. I., Abernathy, T. V., Butera, G., & Lesar, S. (1991). Teacher perceptions of the regular education initiative.Exceptional Children, 57, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D. (1988). Should special education merge with regular education?Educational Policy, 2, 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 2263–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & Bullis, M. (1991). Behavior disorders and the social context of regular class integration: A conceptual dilemma? In J. W. Lloyd, A. C. Repp, & N. N. Singh (Eds.),The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 75–93). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Rethinking special education.Educational Leadership, 44(1), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system.Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on a keynote presentation at the First Annual Conference on Multiple Perspectives on Children and Adolescents with Serious Emotional Disturbance, Virginia Beach, VA, October 8, 1991. Portions of the paper are based on Kauffman and Hallahan (in press).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kauffman, J.M. School reform disorder: Alternative audience responses to nonsense. J Behav Educ 2, 159–176 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947118

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947118

Key words

Navigation