Optic disc morphology in myopic primary open-angle glaucoma

Clinical Investigation

Abstract

• Objective: To evaluate the morphology of the optic disc in highly myopic eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. • Methods: Color stereo optic disc photographs of 44 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and a myopic refractive error exceeding −8 diopters were morphometrically examined and compared with disc photographs of 571 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and a myopic refractive error of less than −8 diopters. • Results: In the highly myopic group, compared to the control group, the optic disc was significantly (P<0.0001) larger, the disc shape was significantly (P<0.0005) more elongated, and the optic cup depth was significantly (P<0.0001) more shallow. The loss of neuroretinal rim was more concentric, and localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects were found significantly less frequently in the highly myopic group than in the control group. In the highly myopic group, zone beta of parapapillary atrophy was significantly (P<0.0001) larger. • Conclusion: The optic disc morphology in primary open-angle glaucoma differs significantly between highly myopic eyes and eyes with hyperopia or low to moderate myopia. The highly myopic eyes are characterized by secondary macrodiscs with elongated shape, shallow and concentric disc cupping, large parapapillary atrophy, and low frequency of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Glaucomatous optic nerve damage in highly myopic eyes, compared to eyes with a normal refractive error, is more diffuse than localized.

Keywords

Optic Disc Myopia Refractive Error Hyperopia Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Airaksinen PJ, Drance SM, Schulzer M (1985) Neuroretinal rim area in early glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 99: 1–4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burk ROW, Rohrschneider K, Noack H, Völcker HE (1992) Are large optic nerve heads susceptible to glaucomatous damage at normal intraocular pressure? A three-dimensional study by scanning laser tomography. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230: 552–560Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daubs JG, Crick RP (1981) Effect of refractive error on the risk of ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 101: 121–126Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drance SM (1989) Disc hemorrhages in the glaucomas. Surv Ophthalmol 33:331–337Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geijssen C (1991) Studies on normal pressure glaucoma. Kugler, Amstelveen, Netherlands, pp 1–238Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geijssen HC, Greve EL (1987) The spectrum of primary open-angle glaucoma. 1. Senile sclerotic glaucoma vs high tension glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 18: 207–213Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greve EL, Geijsson HC (1983) The relationship between excavation and visual field in glaucoma patients with high and low intraocular pressures. In: Greve EL, Heijl A (eds) 5th International Visual Field Symposium. Junk, The Hague, p 35Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jonas JB (1992) Size of glaucomatous optic discs. German J Ophthalmol 1: 41–44Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jonas JB, Gründler AE (1996) Optic disc morphology in “age-related atrophic glaucoma”. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234: 744–749Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonas JB, Gründler AE (1996) Optic disc morphology in juvenile primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234: 750–754Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jonas JB, Papastathopoulos KI (1997) Optic disk morphology in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 123: 174–180Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonas JB, Schiro D (1994) Localized wedge shaped defects of the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 78: 285–290Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH (1988) Optic disk morphometry in high myopia. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226: 587–590Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH (1988) Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration, and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29: 1151–1158; [correction: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (1992) 33: 474–475]Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH (1988) Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. I. Morphometric intrapapillary characteristics. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226: 522–530Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jonas JB, Zäch F-M, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH (1989) Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups. Am J Ophthalmol 107: 137–134Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jonas JB, Fernández MC, Naumann GOH (1992) Glaucomatous parapapillary chorioretinal atrophy: Occurrence and correlations. Arch Ophthalmol 110: 214–222Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jonas JB, Stürmer J, Papastathopoulos KI, Meier-Gibbons F, Dichtl A (1995) Optic disc size and optic nerve damage in normal-pressure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 79: 1102–1105Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kitazawa Y, Shirato S, Yamamoto T (1986) Optic disc hemorrhage in low tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 93: 853–857Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levene RZ (1980) Low-tension glaucoma: a critical review and new material. Surv Ophthalmol 24: 621–664Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Littmann H (1982) Zur Bestimmung der wahren Größe eines Objektes auf dem Hintergrund des lebenden Auges. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 180: 286–289Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perkins ES, Phelps CD (1982) Open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, low-tension glaucoma, and refraction. Arch Ophthalmol 100: 1464–1467Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quigley HA (1982) Childhood glaucoma: results with trabeculectomy and study of reversible cupping. Ophthalmology 89: 219–226Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Quigley HA, Enger C, Katz J, Sommer A, Scott R, Gilbert D (1994) Risk factors for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol 112: 644–649Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shields B (1987) Textbook of glaucoma, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 139–144Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shields B, Ritch R, Krupin T (1989) Classifications and mechanisms of the glaucomas. In: Ritch R, Shields B, Krupin T (eds) The glaucomas, 1st edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 751–752.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sjögren H (1946) A study in pseudoglaucoma (glaucoma without hypertension). Acta Ophthalmol 24: 239–294Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spaeth GL, Hitchings RA, Sivalingam E (1976) The optic disc in glaucoma: pathogenetic correlation of five patterns of cupping in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 81: 217–223Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spaeth GL, Katz LJ, Terebuh AK (1995) Managing glaucoma on the basis of tissue damage: a therapeutic approach based largely on the appearance of the optic disc. In: Krieglstein GK (ed) Glaucoma update V. Kaden, Heidelberg, pp 118–123Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ (1992) Optic disc size in exfoliative, primary open angle, and low-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 110: 211–213Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitäts-AugenklinikErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations