Advertisement

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 167–177 | Cite as

Family patterns leading to learning disability: A cognitive approach

  • Harriet D. Knapp
  • Stanley Kaye
Article

Abstract

Traditional treatment of the learning disabled child seeks to offer an individualized remediation. The authors offer as an alternative the innovative use of the family therapy modality for treatment of the learning dysfunction. This approaches the source of the learning dysfunction embedded in the faulty communication patterns within the family. The child has the opportunity to experience and more accurately comprehend the communication patterns, become more adept at interpretation of implicit meanings, and to transfer these developing skills to the formal learning situation.

Keywords

Public Health Social Psychology Family Therapy Learning Disability Communication Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, B.Conference on development of cross national research on the education of children and adolescents. University of Chicago, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. Brodie, R. D., & Winterbottom, M. R. Failure in elementary school boys as a function of traumata, secrecy and derogation.Child Development, 1967,38, 702–711.Google Scholar
  3. Coles, G. The learning disabilities test battery: Empirical and social issues.Harvard Educational Review, 1978,48, 313–340.Google Scholar
  4. Critchley, M. Developmental dyslexia as a specific cognitive disorder. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.),Cognitive Studies (Vol. 2). New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 906–911.Google Scholar
  6. Fowler, W. Cognitive baselines in early childhood: Developmental learning and differentiation of competence rule systems. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.) Op. Cit. 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Framo, J. L. Rationale and techniques of intensive family therapy. In I. Boszormenyi-Nagy & J. L. Framo (Eds.),Intensive family therapy. Hagerstown, MD.: Harper and Row, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. Freeberg, N. E. and Payne, D. T. Parental influences on cognitive development in early childhood: A review.Child Development, 1967,38, 65–88.Google Scholar
  9. Gearheart, B.Learning disabilities: Educational strategies. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Gill M. The primary process. In R. Holt (Ed.).Motives and thought: Psychoanalytic essays in honor of David Rapaport. New York: International Universities Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Haufrecht, B., & Mitchell, C. Family Systems and Learning Problems: A treatment model.Social Casework, 1978,59, 579–587.Google Scholar
  12. Helman, I. Some observations on mothers of children with intellectual inhibitions.Psychoanalytic study of the child. New York: International Universities Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  13. Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V.C. Early experiences and the socialization of cognitive modes in children.Child development, 1965,36, 869–886.Google Scholar
  14. Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. Maternal influences upon early learning. The cognitive environment of urban preschool children. In R. Hess & R. Bear (Eds.),Early education. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.Google Scholar
  15. Holt, R. R. The development of the primary process: A structural view.Motives and thought: Psychoanalytic essays in honor of David Rapaport, New York: Int. U. Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, O. R., & Westman, J. C. Reading disabilities “hidden problems” and the stability of families.American Journal of Ortho, 1963,33, 303–304.Google Scholar
  17. Peck, B.A communication analysis of family decision making in normal reading problem families. Unpublished disertation. Bowling Green State University, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Stent, G. S. Thinking about seeing: A new approach to visual perception.The Sciences, 1980,20, 6–11.Google Scholar
  19. Vorhaus, P. G. Rorschach configurations associated with reading disability.Journal of Projective Techniques, 1952,XVI, 3–19.Google Scholar
  20. Werner, H.Comparative psychology of mental development, rev. ed. New York: International Universities Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  21. White, B. A child's mind is shaped before age two.Readings in Psychology, 74–75,2, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. Wynne, Lyman C. Some indications and contraindications for exploratory family therapy. In I. Boszormenyi-Nagi, I. & J. L. Framo, (Eds.),Intensive Family Therapy. Hagerstown, MD.: Harper and Row, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harriet D. Knapp
  • Stanley Kaye

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations