Abstract
The concept of the double bind has mainly flourished in the family system therapies. By contrast, it has been overlooked by psychoanalytic therapists. The present paper suggests that the double bind, while not regarded with the same importance as the intrapsychic or interpersonal factors, is certainly real. A concept of the analytic double bind is presented. The analytic double bind is not one of paradoxical, mixed messages and conflicting levels of communication. Instead, it arises from a conflict of incompatible levels of intimacy — specifically, the conflict between technique and intimacy. An attempt is made to delineate the central double bind both from the viewpoint of the analyst and from the viewpoint of the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J. & Weakland, J. H. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia. In Jackson, Don D. (ed.) (1968).Communication, Family and Marriage (Vol. 1, Human Communication Series). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Feynman, Richard P. (1985).QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Freud, S. (1953).The Interpretation of Dreams (Standard Edition, Vol. 4–5). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1900).
Haley, J. (1958). An interactional explanation of hypnosis. In Jackson, Don D. (ed.) (1968).Therapy, Communication, and Change (Vol. 1, Human Communication Series) (p. 89). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Jackson, Don D. & Haley, J. (1963). Transference revisited. In Jackson, Don. D. (ed.) (1968).Therapy, Communication, and Change (Vol. 1, Human Communication Series (p. 89). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Laing, R. D. (1961).Self and Others. Great Britain: Tavistock Publications.
Spitz, Rene A. (1965).The First Year of Life. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.
Wortis, Joseph, M. D. (1954).Fragments of an Analysis with Freud. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alper, G. The double bind in psychoanalysis. J Contemp Psychother 20, 273–283 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946041
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00946041