Advertisement

pure and applied geophysics

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 79–113 | Cite as

Case 23 nomination of precursory seismic quiescence as a significant precursor

  • Max Wyss
  • R. E. Habermann
  • P. Bodin
  • Carl Kisslinger
  • R. O. Burford
  • F. W. Klein
  • A. C. Johnson
  • Zhengxiang Fu
Article

Conclusions

Several cases of extremely strong quiescences have been investigated in great detail, and it was found that they are statistically highly significant and that they cannot be reasonably explained by catalog heterogeneity. Several additional cases of quantitatively measured quiescence have been documented. The method of measuring quiescence has progressed from using visual means to using a quantitative approach, and the understanding of the noise sources has significantly advanced during the last few years. Therefore I feel that quiescence is a real phenomenon and the method to detect it has matured to a point that is acceptable for the List of Significant Precursors, although considerably more work needs to be done to understand this parameter and its role in the earthquake generation process.

Keywords

Generation Process Noise Source Quantitative Approach Additional Case Real Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Habermann, R. E. (1982).Consistency of Teleseismic Reporting Since 1963, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.72, 93–112.Google Scholar
  2. Habermann, R. E. (1983).Teleseismic Detection in the Aleutian Island Arc, J. Geophys. Res.88, 5056–5064.Google Scholar
  3. Habermann, R. E. (1986),A Test of Two Techniques for Recognizing Systematic Errors in Magnitude Estimates Using Data from Parkfield, California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.76, 1660–1667.Google Scholar
  4. Habermann, R. E. (1987),Man-made Changes in Seismicity Rates, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.77, 141–157.Google Scholar
  5. Habermann, R. E. (1988).Precursory Seismic Quiescence: Past, Present and Future, Pure and Appl. Geophys.126, 279–318.Google Scholar
  6. Habermann, R. E., andWyss, M. (1984).Background Seismicity Rates and Precursory Seismic Quiescence: Imperial Valley, California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.74, 1743–1755.Google Scholar
  7. Habermann, R. E., andCraig, M. S. (1988),Comparison of Berkeley and CALNET Magnitude Estimates as a Means of Evaluating Temporal Consistency of Magnitudes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.78, 1255–1267.Google Scholar
  8. Habermann, R. E., andWyss, M. (1987),Reply, J. Geophys. Res.92, 9446–9450.Google Scholar
  9. Kelleher, J. A., andSavino, J. (1975).Distribution of Seismicity before Large Strike-slip and Thrust Earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.80, 260–271.Google Scholar
  10. Kisslinger, C. (1988),An Experiment in Earthquake Prediction and the 7 May 1986 Andreanof Islands Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.78, 218–229.Google Scholar
  11. Kisslinger, C., McDonald, C., andBowman, J. R. (1988),Precursory Time-space Patterns of Seismicity and their Relation to Fault Processes in the Central Aleutian Islands Seismic Zone, Abstract, IASPEI.Google Scholar
  12. Matthews, M. V., andReasenberg, P., eds. (1988),Statistical Methods for Investigating Quiescence and Other Temporal Seismicity Patterns, Pure and Appl. Geophys.126, 357–372.Google Scholar
  13. Mogi, K. (1969).Some Features of Recent Seismic Activity in and near Japan (2), Activity before and after Great Earthquakes, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst.47, Univ. of Tokyo, 395–417.Google Scholar
  14. Ohtake, M., Matumoto, T., andLatham, G. V. (1977),Seismicity Gap near Oaxaca, Southern Mexico as a Probable Precursor to a Large Earthquake, Pure and Appl. Geophys.115, 375–385.Google Scholar
  15. Ohtake, M., Matumoto, T., andLatham, G. V.,Evaluation of the forecast of the 1978 Oaxaca, southern Mexico earthquake based on a precursory seismic quiescence. InEarthquake Prediction (Maurice Ewing Series, Am. Geophys. Union4, 1981), pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
  16. Perez, O. J., andScholz, C. H. (1984),Heterogeneity of the Instrumental Seismicity Catalog (1904–1980) for Strong Shallow Earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.74, 669–686.Google Scholar
  17. Reasenberg, P. A., andMatthews, M. V. (1988),Precursory Seismic Quiescence: A Preliminary Assessment of the Hypothesis, Pure and Appl. Geophys.126, 373–406.Google Scholar
  18. Reasenberg, P. A., Matthews, M. V., andWyss, M. (1988),Re-examination of Seismicity Rate Fluctuations before the 1983 Kaoiki, Hawaii (M 6.6) Earthquake. Abstract, Seismol. Res. Letts.59, 18.Google Scholar
  19. Scholz, C. H., Sykes, L. R., andAggarwal, J. P. (1973).Earthquake Prediction: A Physical Basis, Science181, 803–810.Google Scholar
  20. Stuart, W. D. (1979),Strain Softening Prior to Two-dimensional Strike Slip Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.84, 1063–1070.Google Scholar
  21. Stuart, W. D. (1991),Seismic Quiescence at Parkfield Due to Detachment Faulting, Nature349, 58–61.Google Scholar
  22. Whiteside, L., andHabermann, R. E. (1989),The Seismic Quiescence Prior to the 1978 Oaxaca, Mexico, Earthquake is not a Precursor to that Earthquake. Abstract, IASPEI, 25th General Assembly, Istanbul, Turkey, 339.Google Scholar
  23. Wyss, M. (1986),Seismic Quiescence Precursor to the 1983 Kaoiki (M s =6.6), Hawaii, Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.76, 785–800.Google Scholar
  24. Wyss, M. (1991),Reporting History of the Central Aleutians Seismograph Network and the Quiescence Preceding the 1986 Andreanof Island Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.81, 1231–1254.Google Scholar
  25. Wyss, M.,Examples of an artificial and a precursory seismic quiescence. InEarthquake Prediction: State-of-the-Art (Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France 1992), pp. 157–166.Google Scholar
  26. Wyss, M., Bodin, P., andHabermann, R. E. (1990a),Seismic Quiescence at Parkfield: An Independent Indication of an Imminent Earthquake. Nature345, 426–428.Google Scholar
  27. Wyss, M., andBurford, R. O. (1985),Current Episodes of Seismic Quiescence along the San Andreas Fault between San Juar Bautista and Stone Canyon, California: Possible Precursors to Local Moderate Mainshocks? U.S. Geol. Survey, Open File Report 85-745, 367–426.Google Scholar
  28. Wyss, M., andBurford, R. O. (1987),A Predicted Earthquake on the San Andreas Fault, California, Nature329, 323–325.Google Scholar
  29. Wyss, M., andHabermann, R. E. (1988a),Precursory Quiescence, Pure and Appl. Geophys126, 319–332.Google Scholar
  30. Wyss, M., andHabermann, R. E. (1988b),Precursory Quiescence before the August 1982 Stone Canyon, San Andreas Fault, Earthquakes, Pure and Appl. Geophys.126, 333–356.Google Scholar
  31. Wyss, M., Habermann, R. E., andBodin, P. (1991),Seismic Quiescence: A Test of the Hypothesis and a Precursor to the Next Parkfield, California, Earthquake, Geophys. J. Int.110, 518–536.Google Scholar
  32. Wyss, M., andFu, Z. X. (1989),Precursory Seismic Quiescence before the January 1982 Hilea, Hawaii, Earthquakes, Bull Seismol. Soc. Am.79, 756–773.Google Scholar
  33. Wyss, M., Johnston, A. C., andKlein, F. W. (1981a),Multiple Asperity Model for Earthquake Prediction, Nature,289, 231–234.Google Scholar
  34. Wyss, M., Klein, F. W., andJohnston, A. C. (1981b),Precursors to the Kalapana M=7.2 Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res.86, 3881–3900.Google Scholar
  35. Wyss, M., Slater, L., andBurford, R. O. (1990b),Decrease in Deformation Rate as Possible Precursor to the Next Parkfield Earthquake, Nature345, 428–431.Google Scholar
  36. Wyss, M., Westerhaus, M., Berkhemer, H., andAtes, R. (1995),Precursory Seismic Quiescence in the Mudurnu Valley, North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, Geophys. J. Int.123, 117–124.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Wyss
    • 1
  • R. E. Habermann
  • P. Bodin
  • Carl Kisslinger
  • R. O. Burford
  • F. W. Klein
  • A. C. Johnson
  • Zhengxiang Fu
  1. 1.Geophysical InstituteUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations