Summary
The geophysical interpretation of satellite tracking residuals generally ignores the filtering effect of initial orbit correction on the true errors of the model. While the filtered information is usually regarded as lost, knowing the spectral characteristics of the filter is a great aid in the detailed interpretation of residuals, especially of global data sets. In this regard, we derive the filter characteristics (admittances) of orbit correction in the presence of geopotential-caused trajectory errors. We then apply the filter to determine the likely power of the lost radial information in crossover differences of sea heights determined from satellite altimetry or in the latitude lumped coefficients derived from them. For example, we find that resonant geopotential information with periods longer than the corrected orbit's arc length is largely lost in residual crossover data. Results are given for GEOSAT, ERS-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon in their Exact Repeat Missions, using calibrated variancecovariance matrices of the harmonic geopotential coefficients of several recent Earth gravity models. To prove that filtering is important, we first employed a simple cut of all perturbing terms with periods longer than the general tracking period (4 days for GEOSAT and ERS-1, and 10 days for TOPEX). But the cut is too crude a method from a theoretical viewpoint, and thus, we developed two new filters. A comparison of their admittances explains the differences (and sometimes anomalous behaviour) between them and the cut. Many numerical examples (single-satellite crossover errors and latitude lumped coefficient errors, as projected from the variance-covariance matrices) are presented.
This paper has been presented during the Panel on Satellite Dynamics, at COSPAR 1994, in Hamburg, Germany.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breiter S, Wnuk E 1990: The estimation of radial, transverse and binormal geopotential perturbations for the orbits of some satellites,Celest. Mech. 48, 375.
Colombo O 1984: Altimetry, Orbits and Tides,NASA Techn. Memor. 86180, GSFC Greenbelt.
Engelis T 1987: Radial Orbit Error Reduction and Sea Surface Topography Determination Using Satellite Altimetry,Ohio State University Rep. # 377, DGSS, Columbus.
Kaula W M 1966:Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ Co., Waltham.
Klokočník J, Li H, Mueller H 1990:The German PAF for ERS-1: Investigation of Radial Orbit Error for ERS-1 by means of Rosborough's formulae, D-PAF/DGFI ERS-D-roe 31600, Techn. Rep. of Deutsche Geodaet. Forschungs Inst., Abt. 1, Műnchen.
Klokočník J, Kobrle F 1991: Three types of crossovers, their errors and sensitivity to the Earth's gravity field, presented at 20th GA IUGG, Vienna, Austria, Symp. U5: ”Applic. of Gravim. and Space Techn. to Geodynamics and Ocean Dynamics”.
Klokočník J, Kobrle F 1992: Dual-satellite Crossover altimetry for ERS-1/TOPEX, presented at COSPAR, The World Space Congress, Washington, DC, paper B.9-M.2.05, see also:Adv. Space Res. 13, (11) 335.
Klokočník J, Wagner C A, Kobrle F 1992: A test of GEM T2 from GEOSAT crossovers using Latitude Lumped Coefficients, presented at 7th Interntl. Symp. ”Geodesy and Physics of the Earth”, Potsdam, Germany,Proceedings IAG Symp. 112, eds. H.Montag and Ch. Reigber, Springer-Verlag, pp.79–82.
Klokočník J, Kostelecký J, Jandová M 1993: Altimetry with Dual-Satellite Crossovers, presented at IAG GM Beijing, China, Session D10: ”Impact of satellite Altimetry on Gravity Field Determination”, see also: 1995,Manuscr. Geod. 20, 82.
Klokočník J, Wagner C A 1994: A test of GEM T2 from GEOSAT Crossovers using Latitude Lumped Coefficients,Bull. Geod. 68, 100.
Kostelecký J, Reigber Ch, Klokočník J, Raimondo J C, 1989: Error Assessment of the First-Order Perturbation Theory for Deep Resonant Cases,Bull. Astronom. Insts. Czechosl. 40, 321.
Marsh J G, and 16 others 1989: The GEM-T2 Gravitational Model,NASA Techn. Memor. 100746, Greenbelt; see also: 1990, inSea Surface Topography and the Geoid, IAG Symp. 104, eds.: H.Sűnkel and T.Baker, Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–10.
Nerem R S, Lerch F J, Williamson R G, Klosko S M, Robbins J W, Patel B G 1994: Gravity Model Improvement using the DORIS Tracking System on the SPOT 2 Satellite,J. Geophys. Res. 99, B2, 2791.
Rosborough G W 1986:Satellite Orbit Perturbations due to the Geopotential, CSR-86-1, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Center for Space Research.
Rosborough G W, Tapley B D 1987: Radial, transverse and normal satellite position perturbations due to geopotential,Celest. Mech. 40, 409.
Schwintzer P, and 12 others 1991:A New Earth Gravity Model in Support of ERS-1 and SPOT-2, GRIM4S1/C1, DGFI and GRGS Report to DARA and CNES.
Tapley B D, Shum C K, Yuan D N, Ries J C, Eanes R J, Watkins M M, Schutz B E 1991: The University of Texas Earth Gravity Field Model (TEG 2B), 20th GA of IUGG, IAG Symp. G3, Vienna, Austria.
Wagner C A 1987: Geopotential Orbit Variations: Applications to Error Analysis,J. Geophys. Res. 92, B8, 8136.
Wagner C A, Klokočník J 1992: Geopotential Crossover Errors for Recent Models from GEOSAT and ERS- 1 Altimetry,EOS 73,# 43, 128.
Wagner C A, Klokočník J 1994: Accuracy of the GEM T2 Geopotential from GEOSAT and ERS-1 Crossover Altimetry,J. Geophys. Res. 99, B5, 9179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klokočník, J., Wagner, C.A., Kostelecky, J. et al. The filtering effect of orbit correction on geopotential errors. Journal of Geodesy 70, 146–157 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00943690
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00943690