Summary
The midfacial region in vertebrates may be considered as developing from five separate processes, namely the central frontonasal process (FNP) and the paired maxillary and lateral nasal processes. Relatively little is known about the mechanisms whereby these processes interact to produce structures of the neonatal/adult face. This study was undertaken to gain some insights into the events involved in this process, and involved observing the effects on facial development in the chick of surgical excision of the FNP, prior to its fusion with the other facial processes. In the absence of the FNP, outgrowth of the upper beak was dramatically reduced, agenesis of the primary palate occurred, and development of the maxillary processes and palatal shelves was impaired. Thus, in the chick, the frontonasal process plays a major role in midfacial morphogenesis. Not only does the FNP provide the primary palate and a contribution to the development of the nasal septum, it is also important in the ordered development of the maxillary processes and of the definitive secondary palate contributions which have not emerged clearly from in vitro and teratogenic studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott BD, Hill LG, Birnbaum LS (1990) Processes involved in retinoic acid production of small embryonic palatal shelves and limb defects. Teratology 41:299–310
Abbott UK, MacCabe JA (1966) Ectrodactyly: a new embryonic lethal mutation in the chicken. J Hered 57:207–211
Burk DB, Sadler TW (1983) Morphogenesis of medial facial clefts in mice treated with diazo-oxo-norleucine (DON). Teratology 27:385–394
Cousley RRJ, Wilson DJ (1990) The effects of surgical section of the embryonic chick mandibular arch. Anat Embryol 182:401–408
Darab D, Sciote J, Minkoff R, Sulik K (1987) Pathogenesis of medial facial clefts in mice treated with methotrexate. Teratology 36:77–86
Greene RM, Shah RM, Lloyd MR, Crawford BJ, Suen R, Shanfield JL, Davidovitch Z (1983) Differentiation of the avian secondary palate. J Exp Zool 225:43–52
Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–52
Jones KL (1988) Smith's recognizable patterns of human malformation, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
Koch WE, Smiley GR (1981) In vivo and in vitro studies of the development of the avian secondary palate. Arch Oral Biol 26:161–187
McCullagh JJ, Gill P, Wilson DJ (1990) Repair of cartilaginous fractures during chick limb development. J Orthop Res 8:127–131
Milunsky A, Graef JW, Gaynor MF Jr (1968) Methotrexate-induced congenital malformations. J Pediatr 72:790–795
Minkoff R (1980a) Cell proliferation and migration during primary palate development In: Pratt RM, Christiansen L (eds) Current research trends in prenatal craniofacial development. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 119–132
Minkoff R (1980b) Regional variation of cell proliferation within the facial processes of the chick embryo: a study of the role of “merging” during development. J Embryol Exp Morphol 57:37–49
Ohbayashi N, Eto K (1986) Relative contributions of the facial processes to facial development: a microsurgical assay. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol [Suppl 2]:41–44
Patterson SB, Minkoff R (1985) Morphometric and autoradiographic analysis of frontonasal development in the chick embryo. Anat Rec 212:90–99
Richman JM, Tickle C (1989) Epithelia are interchangeable between facial primordia of chick embryos and morphogenesis is controlled by the mesenchyme. Dev Biol 136:201–210
Shah RM, Crawford BJ (1980) Development of the secondary palate in the chick embryo: a light and electron microscopic and histochemical study. Invest Cell Pathol 3:319–328
Shaw IA, Ferguson MWJ (1987) Mechanisms and characteristics of embryonic woundhealing: an experimental study in the chick. J Dent Res 66:861
Sulik KK, Cook CS, Webster WS (1988) Teratogens and craniofacial malformations: relationships to cell death. Development 103S:213–232
Summerbell D, Hornbruch A (1981) The chick embryo: a standard against which to judge in vitro systems. In: Neubert D, Merker H-J (eds) Culture technique — applicability for studies on prenatal differentiation and toxicitiy. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 529–539
Tamarin A, Crawley A, Lee J, Tickle C (1984) Analysis of upper beak defects in chick embryos following treatment with retinoic acid. J Embryol Exp Morphol 84:105–123
Wedden SE (1987) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the development of chick facial primordia and the target of retinoid action. Development 99:341–351
Wilson DJ, McNeill J, Hinchcliffe JR (1989) Repair of apical wounds in the developing chick wing bud: the response of the developing vasculature, and subsequent woundhealing. Anat Embryol 180:383–391
Yee GW, Abbott UK (1978) Facial development in normal and mutant chick embryos. J Exp Zool 206:307–322
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCann, J.P., Owens, P.D.A. & Wilson, D.J. Chick frontonasal process excision significantly affects mid-facial development. Anat Embryol 184, 171–178 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942748
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942748