Skip to main content
Log in

Chick frontonasal process excision significantly affects mid-facial development

  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The midfacial region in vertebrates may be considered as developing from five separate processes, namely the central frontonasal process (FNP) and the paired maxillary and lateral nasal processes. Relatively little is known about the mechanisms whereby these processes interact to produce structures of the neonatal/adult face. This study was undertaken to gain some insights into the events involved in this process, and involved observing the effects on facial development in the chick of surgical excision of the FNP, prior to its fusion with the other facial processes. In the absence of the FNP, outgrowth of the upper beak was dramatically reduced, agenesis of the primary palate occurred, and development of the maxillary processes and palatal shelves was impaired. Thus, in the chick, the frontonasal process plays a major role in midfacial morphogenesis. Not only does the FNP provide the primary palate and a contribution to the development of the nasal septum, it is also important in the ordered development of the maxillary processes and of the definitive secondary palate contributions which have not emerged clearly from in vitro and teratogenic studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott BD, Hill LG, Birnbaum LS (1990) Processes involved in retinoic acid production of small embryonic palatal shelves and limb defects. Teratology 41:299–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott UK, MacCabe JA (1966) Ectrodactyly: a new embryonic lethal mutation in the chicken. J Hered 57:207–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk DB, Sadler TW (1983) Morphogenesis of medial facial clefts in mice treated with diazo-oxo-norleucine (DON). Teratology 27:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousley RRJ, Wilson DJ (1990) The effects of surgical section of the embryonic chick mandibular arch. Anat Embryol 182:401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Darab D, Sciote J, Minkoff R, Sulik K (1987) Pathogenesis of medial facial clefts in mice treated with methotrexate. Teratology 36:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene RM, Shah RM, Lloyd MR, Crawford BJ, Suen R, Shanfield JL, Davidovitch Z (1983) Differentiation of the avian secondary palate. J Exp Zool 225:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KL (1988) Smith's recognizable patterns of human malformation, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch WE, Smiley GR (1981) In vivo and in vitro studies of the development of the avian secondary palate. Arch Oral Biol 26:161–187

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh JJ, Gill P, Wilson DJ (1990) Repair of cartilaginous fractures during chick limb development. J Orthop Res 8:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Milunsky A, Graef JW, Gaynor MF Jr (1968) Methotrexate-induced congenital malformations. J Pediatr 72:790–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff R (1980a) Cell proliferation and migration during primary palate development In: Pratt RM, Christiansen L (eds) Current research trends in prenatal craniofacial development. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff R (1980b) Regional variation of cell proliferation within the facial processes of the chick embryo: a study of the role of “merging” during development. J Embryol Exp Morphol 57:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbayashi N, Eto K (1986) Relative contributions of the facial processes to facial development: a microsurgical assay. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol [Suppl 2]:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson SB, Minkoff R (1985) Morphometric and autoradiographic analysis of frontonasal development in the chick embryo. Anat Rec 212:90–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman JM, Tickle C (1989) Epithelia are interchangeable between facial primordia of chick embryos and morphogenesis is controlled by the mesenchyme. Dev Biol 136:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah RM, Crawford BJ (1980) Development of the secondary palate in the chick embryo: a light and electron microscopic and histochemical study. Invest Cell Pathol 3:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw IA, Ferguson MWJ (1987) Mechanisms and characteristics of embryonic woundhealing: an experimental study in the chick. J Dent Res 66:861

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulik KK, Cook CS, Webster WS (1988) Teratogens and craniofacial malformations: relationships to cell death. Development 103S:213–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerbell D, Hornbruch A (1981) The chick embryo: a standard against which to judge in vitro systems. In: Neubert D, Merker H-J (eds) Culture technique — applicability for studies on prenatal differentiation and toxicitiy. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 529–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamarin A, Crawley A, Lee J, Tickle C (1984) Analysis of upper beak defects in chick embryos following treatment with retinoic acid. J Embryol Exp Morphol 84:105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedden SE (1987) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the development of chick facial primordia and the target of retinoid action. Development 99:341–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DJ, McNeill J, Hinchcliffe JR (1989) Repair of apical wounds in the developing chick wing bud: the response of the developing vasculature, and subsequent woundhealing. Anat Embryol 180:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee GW, Abbott UK (1978) Facial development in normal and mutant chick embryos. J Exp Zool 206:307–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCann, J.P., Owens, P.D.A. & Wilson, D.J. Chick frontonasal process excision significantly affects mid-facial development. Anat Embryol 184, 171–178 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942748

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942748

Key words

Navigation