Skip to main content
Log in

Biostatistical studies on western EuropeanDactylorhiza (Orchidaceae)—theD. maculata group

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multivariate analysis tools are exploited on a data set composed of quantitative characteristics collected on 35 populations of plants of theDactylorhiza maculata (L.)Soó group from Western-Europe. These samples lead to four well-defined clusters; this, together with qualitative, cytological and ecological arguments, allows for the recognition of four specific entities:D. maculata s.str.,D. fuchsii (Druce)Soó,D. saccifera (Brongn.)Soó andD. caramulensis (Vermeulen)Tyteca. It is concluded that the floral characters play an essential role in the taxonomical distinction. It also appears that the set of characters measured, as well as the methods exploited, are especially well-suited and valuable tools for the morphological study of the genusDactylorhiza.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averyanov, L., 1989: Conspectus generisDactylorhiza Neck. exNevski (Orchidaceae), 2 (Russian). — Nov. Syst. Plant. Vasc.26: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, R. M., Denholm, I., 1983: A reappraisal of the British and Irish dactylorchids, 1. The tetraploid marsh-orchids. — Watsonia14: 347–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1985: A reappraisal of the British and Irish dactylorchids, 2. The diploid marshorchids. — Watsonia15: 321–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: A reappraisal of the British and Irish dactylorchids, 3. The spotted-orchids. — Watsonia17: 319–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: On measuring marsh-orchids. Morphometric procedure, taxonomic objectivity and marsh-orchid systematics. — Watsonia17: 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, H., Künkele, S., 1988: Die Orchideen Europas. — Stuttgart: Kosmos Naturführer, Franckh'sche Verlagshandlung, W. Keller & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttler, K. P., 1986: Orchideen. — Die wildwachsenden Arten und Unterarten Europas, Vorderasiens und Nordafrikas. — München: Steinbachs Naturführer, Mosaik Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, E. G., Camus, A., 1921–1929: Iconographie des orchidées d'Europe et du bassin méditerranéen. — Paris: Lechevalier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., 1862: On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of inter-crossing. — London.

  • Dressler, R. L., 1981: The orchids. — natural history and classification. — Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathoye, J.-L., Tyteca, D., 1987: Étude biostatistique desDactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) de Belgique et des territoires voisins. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belgique57: 389–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Contribution à l'étude cytotaxonomique desDactylorhiza d'Europe occidentale. — Mém. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique11:30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gölz, P., Reinhard, H. R., 1973: Biostatistische Untersuchungen an europäischen Orchideen. — Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.83: 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1975: Biostatistische Untersuchungen überOphrys bertoloniiformis O. & E. Danesch. — Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.85: 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984: Die Orchideenflora Albaniens—OPTIMA-Projekt „Kartierung der mediterranen Orchideen“. — Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. heim. Orch. Baden-Württ.16: 193–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986: Orchideen in Jugoslawien. — Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. heim. Orch. Baden-Württ.18: 689–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., 1951: A comparison of some Swedish and British forms ofOrchis maculata L. sens. lat. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.45: 608–635+4 pl

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1968: Genetic system and ecological habit as factors in Dactylorchid variation. — Jahresber. naturwiss. Vereins Wuppertal21/22: 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagiełło, M., 1988: Analysis of population variability and distribution of species from theDactylorhiza maculata group (Orchidaceae) in Poland. — Fragm.Flor. Geobot.31–32: 333–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalteisen, M., Reinhard, H. R., 1986: Orchideen im zentralen italienischen Südalpenraum. — Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. heim. Orch. Baden-Württ.18: 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., Fortin, M.-J., 1989: Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. — Vegetatio80: 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, J. B., 1967: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. — InLe Cam, L. M., Neyman, J. (Eds.): Proc. fifth Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat. Probab. 1, pp. 281–297. — Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. M., (Ed.), 1980:Orchidaceae. — InTutin, T. C., & al., (Eds.): Flora Europaea5, pp. 325–350. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nelson, E., 1976: Monographie und Ikonographie der Orchidaceen-GattungDactylorhiza. — Zürich: Speich AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, H. R., 1985: Skandinavische und alpineDactylorhiza-Arten (Orchidaceae). — Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. heim. Orch. Baden-Württ.17: 321–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1990: Kritische Anmerkungen zu einigenDactylorhiza-Arten (Orchidaceae) Europas. — Mitt. Bl. Arbeitskr. heim. Orch. Baden-Württ.22: 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc., 1982: SAS user's guide: statistics. — Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, K. M., 1986: Multivariate allometry and removal of size with principal components analysis. — Syst. Zool.35: 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Allometry, isometry and shape in principal components analysis. — Syst. Zool.38: 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Späth, H., 1980: Cluster analysis algorithms. — Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundermann, H., 1980: Europäische und mediterrane Orchideen. — Eine Bestimmungsflora. 3rd edn. — Hildesheim: Brücke-Verlag Kurt Schmersow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca, D., 1989: Orchidées du Portugal—Remarques sur les espèces du genreDactylorhiza. — L'Orchidophile20: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: LesDactylorhiza d'Europe occidentale: approche biostatistique. — Natural. Belges69, no. spécial “Orchidées”: 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1989: Contribution à l'étude biostatistique desDactylorhiza d'Europe occidentale. — Mém. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique11: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhecke, L., 1989: Intraclonal variation and intercorrelation of morphological characters inDactylorhiza praetermissa: evidence for allometry inOrchidaceae. — Mém. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique11: 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Straaten, D., Peymen, J., Schneiders, A., Verheyen, R., 1988: The morphological variation of a population ofDactylorhiza maculata (L.)Soó (s.l.) in a base-rich marsh (Het Buitengoor, Belgium). — Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belgique58: 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, P., 1970: Some critical remarks on the dactylorchids of Portugal. — Bol. Soc. Brot., Sér. 2,44: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vöth, W., Greilhuber, J., 1980: Zur Karyosystematik vonDactylorhiza maculata s.l. und ihrer Verbreitung, insbesondere in Niederösterreich. — Linzer Biol. Beitr.12(2): 415–468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dufrêne, M., Gathoye, JL. & Tyteca, D. Biostatistical studies on western EuropeanDactylorhiza (Orchidaceae)—theD. maculata group. Pl Syst Evol 175, 55–72 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942145

Key words

Navigation