Destruction of the basement membrane (BM) is mandatory for tumor spread, and matrix metalloproteinases MMPs) are known to be implicated in colon cancer invasion and metastasis by digesting type IV collagen, a main component of the BM. The current study analyzed the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in pancreatic cancer tissues. Frozen specimens of pancreatic cancer (n = 10), a liver metastatic nodule from pancreatic cancer (n = 1), and normal pancreas (n = 3) were homogenized and analyzed by zymography. The activated form of MMP-9 (82kDa) was detected in all of the normal and malignant tissues, while the activated form of MMP-2 (62kDa) was detected in all of the pancreatic cancers and its metastatic tissue, but not in the normal pancreatic tissues. These results indicate that expression of the activated form of MMP-2 may be specific to pancreatic cancer, while that of MMP-9 may be unrelated to it.
MMP-2 zymography pancreatic cancer
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Liotta LA, Tryggvason K, Garbisa S, Hart I, Foltz CM, Shafie S (1980) Metastatic potential correlates with enzymatic degradation of basement membrane collagen. Nature 284:67–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
Levy AT, Cioce V, Sobel ME, Garbisa S, Grigioni WF, Liotta LA, Stetler-Stevenson G (1991) Increased expression of M,72000 type IV collagenase in human colonic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 51:439–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
Heussen C, Dowdle EB (1980) Electrophoretic analysis of plasminogen activators in polyacrylamide gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate and copolymerized substrates. Anal Biochem 102:196–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brown PD, Bloxidge RE, Stuart NSA, Gatter KC, Carmichael J (1993) Association between expression of activated 72-kilodalton gelatinase and tumor spread in non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:574–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tamakoshi K, Kikkawa F, Nawa A, Maeda O, Kawai M, Suganuma N, Yamagata M, Tomada Y (1994) Different pattern of zymograpphy between human gynecologic normal and malignant tissues. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:478–484PubMedGoogle Scholar