Psychological Research

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 251–259 | Cite as

The effects of enactive encoding, type of movement, and imagined perspective on memory of dance

  • Mary Ann Foley
  • Veronica Bouffard
  • Tarja Raag
  • Mary DiSanto-Rose
Article

Summary

The present experiments examine the importance of the availability of verbal descriptions and internal motor representations on memory of self-performed tasks, or the SPT effect, by varying the commonality of the actions (Experiments 1 and 2) and the knowledge of the performers (dancers vs. nondancers, Experiment 2). In addition, the effects of the perspective one adopts during imagination was assessed by manipulation of whom the subjects imagined performing (self vs. other, Experiment 1) and of how they imagined themselves performing (Experiment 2). Results suggest that the availability of verbal descriptions and motor representations are not essential for the production of an SPT effect, since subjects demonstrated an SPT effect for uncommon movements (Experiment 1). Furthermore, the availability of verbal descriptions and motor representations does not guarantee an SPT effect; dancers did not exhibit this effect (Experiment 2). Finally, the perspective one adopts during imagining affects memory performance in that whom one imagines (self vs. other) has a significant effect (Experiment 1).

Keywords

Present Experiment Memory Performance Verbal Description Motor Representation Internal Motor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. (1984). Did I do it or did I only imagine doing it?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 594–613.Google Scholar
  2. Balota, D. A., & Neely, J. H. (1980). Test expectancy and word frequency effects in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 576–587.Google Scholar
  3. Brunia, C. H. M. (1984). Selective and a selective control of spinal motor structures during preparation for a movement. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.),Preparatory states and processes (pp. 285–302). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, R. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–282.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, R. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events.Memory & Cognition, 11, 573–582.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, R. (1989). Memory for action events: The power of enactment.Educational Psychology Review, 1, 57–80.Google Scholar
  7. Corbin, C. B. (1972). The effects of covert rehearsal on the development of a complex motor skill.Journal of General Psychology, 76, 143–150.Google Scholar
  8. Engelkamp, J. (1990). Memory of action events: Some implications for memory theory and for imagery. In C. Cornoldi & M. McDaniel (Eds.),Imagery and cognition. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Engelkamp, J., & Sieloff, U. (1985). Individual differences in motor imagery ability and recall of action phrases.Archiv für Psychologie, 137, 241–253.Google Scholar
  10. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1983). Zum Einflu\ von Wahrnehmen und Tun auf das Behalten von Verb-Objekt Phrasen.Sprache & Kognition, 2, 117–127.Google Scholar
  11. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Denis, M. (1989). Paired-associate learning of action verbs with visual- or motor-imaginal encoding instructions.Psychological Research, 50, 257–263.Google Scholar
  12. Epstein, M. (1980). The relationship of mental imagery and mental rehearsal to the performance of a motor task.Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 211–220.Google Scholar
  13. Feltz, D., & Landers, D. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis.Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 25–27.Google Scholar
  14. Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison.Child Development, 56, 1145–1155.Google Scholar
  15. Foley, M. A., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech.Child Development, 54, 51–60.Google Scholar
  16. Foley, M. A., Aman, C., & Gutch, D. (1987). Discriminating between action memories: Children's use of kinesthetic cues and visible consequences.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 335–347.Google Scholar
  17. Foley, M. A., Santini, C., & Sopasakis, M. (1989). Discriminating between memories: Evidence for children's use of spontaneous elaborations.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 146–149.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, G. (1931). The spread of neuromuscular activity during mental work.Journal of General Psychology, 5, 479–494.Google Scholar
  19. Glanzer, M., & Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of word frequency effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21–31.Google Scholar
  20. Goss, S., Hall, C., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. (1986). Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements.Memory & Cognition, 14, 469–477.Google Scholar
  21. Hale, B. (1982). The effects of internal and external imagery on muscular and ocular concomitants.Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 379–387.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, E., & Erffmeyer, E. (1983). The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal with videotaped modeling on free throw accuracy of intercollegiate female basketball players.Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 343–346.Google Scholar
  23. Hardy, L., & Ringland, A. (1984). Mental training and the inner game.Human Learning, 3, 203–207.Google Scholar
  24. Hawkins, A. M. (1964).Creating through dance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Hays, J. F. (1981).Modern dance, a biomechanical approach to teaching. St Louis: C. V. Mosby Company.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobson, E. (1931). Electrical measurements of neuromuscular states during mental activities. V. Variation of specific muscles contracting during imagination.American Journal of Physiology, 96, 116–121.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobson, E. (1932). Electrophysiology of mental activities.American Journal of Psychology, 44, 677–694.Google Scholar
  28. Keppel, G. (1984).Design and analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. MacKay, D. (1981). The problem of rehearsal or mental practice.Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 274–285.Google Scholar
  30. McGuigan, F. J. (1978). Covert functioning of the motor system. In G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mendoza, D., & Wichman, H. (1978). “Inner darts:” Effects of mental practice on dart throwing.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1195–1199.Google Scholar
  32. Minas, S. (1977). Memory coding for movement.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 787–790.Google Scholar
  33. Minas, S. (1978). Mental practice of a complex perceptual motor skill.Journal of Human Movement Studies, 4, 102–107.Google Scholar
  34. Minas, S. (1980). Acquisition of a motor skill following guided mental and physical practice.Journal of Human Movement Studies, 6, 127–141.Google Scholar
  35. Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acids.Psychological Research, 51, 181–187.Google Scholar
  36. Overby, L. (1987 a). Imagery as a teaching tool: A survey of dance teachers. Unpublished questionnaire, College of Physical Education, Recreation and Health, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  37. Overby, L. (1987 b). Imagery: A teaching tool for dance.Easterner.Google Scholar
  38. Overby, L., & Humphrey, J. H. (1989).Dance: Current selected research. Annual from AMS.Google Scholar
  39. Reder, L., Charney, D., & Morgan, M. (1986). The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text.Memory & Cognition, 14, 64–78.Google Scholar
  40. Richardson, A. (1967). Mental practice: A review and discussion.Research Quarterly, 38, 98–107.Google Scholar
  41. Ryan, E., & Simons, J. (1982). Efficacy of mental imagery in enhancing mental rehearsal of motor skills.Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 41–51.Google Scholar
  42. Sherbon, E. (1975).On the count of one: Modern dance methods. Palo Alto, California: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  43. Sweigard, L. (1974).Human movement potential: Its ideokinetic facilitation. New York: Dodd, Mead, & Co.Google Scholar
  44. Todd, M. (1937).The thinking body. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Book Co.Google Scholar
  45. Twining, W. E. (1949). Mental practice and physical practice in learning a motor skill.Research Quarterly, 20, 432.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Ann Foley
    • 1
  • Veronica Bouffard
    • 2
  • Tarja Raag
    • 3
  • Mary DiSanto-Rose
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySkidmore CollegeSaratoga SpringsUSA
  2. 2.Goucher CollegeBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Indiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Physical Education and DanceSkidmore CollegeSaratoga SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations