Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 186, Issue 3–4, pp 157–173 | Cite as

Variation at isozyme loci in wildVigna unguiculata (Fabaceae, Phaseoleae)

  • Rémy S. Pasquet
Article

Abstract

An electrophoretic comparison of variation at 37 presumptive isozyme gene loci was performed for 55 wildVigna unguiculata accessions. The analysis included seven subspecies, covering the whole range of variation available in wildVigna unguiculata. The results of the isoenzymatic study broadly confirmed the previous infraspecific classification inferred from morphological data. Although the “southern taxa” (e.g., subsp.tenuis, subsp.stenophylla) are as yet too poorly sampled to discuss in depth, wildVigna unguiculata can be divided into one mainly autogamous annual group (including subsp.pubescens and var.spontanea) and several widely divergent perennial subspecies.

Key words

Fabaceae Phaseoleae Vigna unguiculata Isozymes cowpea 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cardy, B. J., Stuber, C. W., Goodman, M. N., 1983: Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize (Zea mays L.). — Inst. of Stat. Mimeo. No. 1317 R. — Raleigh: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  2. Crawford, D. J., 1983: Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. — InTanksley, S. O., Orton, T. J., (Eds): Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, A, pp. 257–287. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Harris, H., Hopkinson, D. A., 1978: Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. — Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Jaaska, V., Jaaska, V., 1988: Isoenzyme variation in the generaPhaseolus andVigna in relation to their systematics: aspartate aminotransferase and superoxyde dismutase. — Pl. Syst. Evol.159: 145–159.Google Scholar
  5. Koenig, R., Gepts, P., 1989: Allozyme diversity in wildPhaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of genetic diversity. — Theor. Appl. Genet.78: 809–817.Google Scholar
  6. Maréchal, R., Masherpa, J. M., Stainier, F., 1978: Etude taxonomique d'un groupe complexe d'espèces des genresPhaseolus etVigna (Papilionaceae) sur la base de données morphologiques et polliniques, traitées par l'analyse informatique. — Boissiera28: 1–273.Google Scholar
  7. Nei, M., 1978: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. — Genetics89: 583–590.Google Scholar
  8. Ng, N. Q., 1990: Recent developments in cowpea germplasm collection, conservation, evaluation, and research at the genetic resources unit, IITA. — InNg, N. Q., Monti, L. M., (Eds): Cowpea genetic resources, pp. 13–28. — Ibadan: IITA.Google Scholar
  9. , 1985: Cowpea taxonomy, origin, and germplasm. — InSingh, S. R., Rachie, K. O., (Eds): Cowpea research, production and utilization, pp. 11–21. — Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Noirot, M., Desjardin, J., Mullon, C., Savy, L., 1987: Logiciel de calculs statistiques pour micro-ordinateurs, “NDMS”. — Paris: ORSTOM.Google Scholar
  11. Pasquet, R., 1993: Classification infraspecifique des formes spontanées deVigna unguiculata (L.)Walp. à partir de données morphologiques. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Schinkel, C., Gepts, P., 1989: Allozyme variability in the Tepary Bean,Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. — Pl. Breed.102: 182–195.Google Scholar
  13. Second, G., Trouslot, P., 1980: Electrophorèse d'enzymes de riz (Oryza sp.). — Travaux Doc. O.R.S.T.O.M.120, 88. — Paris: ORSTOM.Google Scholar
  14. Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical taxonomy. — San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  15. Tanksley, S. D., Rick, C. M., 1980: Isozymic gene linkage map of tomato. Applications in genetics and breeding. — Theor. Appl. Genet.57: 161–170.Google Scholar
  16. Vallejos, C. E., 1983: Enzyme activity staining. — InTanksley, S. D., Orton, T. J., (Eds): Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, A, pp. 469–516. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Verdcourt, B., 1970: Studies in theLeguminosae-Papilionoideae for the Flora of Tropical East Africa. IV. — Kew Bull.24: 507–569.Google Scholar
  18. Weeden, N. F., 1984: Distinguishing among white seeded bean cultivars by means of allozyme genotypes. — Euphytica33: 199–208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rémy S. Pasquet
    • 1
  1. 1.ORSTOM (Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération)NiameyNiger

Personalised recommendations