Skip to main content
Log in

Local-global properties of bifunctions

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Representations of composite systems, such as bilinear programming, models of consumer/producer behavior, and sensitivity problems involve bifunctions (functions of two vector arguments). Such bifunctions are typically convex, pseudoconvex, or quasiconvex in each of their arguments, but not jointly convex, pseudoconvex, or quasiconvex. These functions do not in general possess the strong local-global property, namely, that every stationary point is a global minimum. In this paper, we define conditions that ensure that a bifunction possesses only a global minimum. In exploring this question, we use P-convexity and pseudo P-convexity, which are classes of bifunctions that generalize quasiconvexity and pseudoconvexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crouzeix, J. P., andLindberg, P. O.,Additively Decomposed Quasiconvex Functions, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 35, pp. 42–57, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Debrue, G., andKoopmans, T. C.,Additively Decomposed Quasiconvex Functions, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 24, pp. 1–38, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yaari, M. E.,A Note on Separability and Quasiconcavity, Econometrica, Vol. 45, pp. 1183–1186, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hackman, S. T., andPassy, U.,Projectively-Convex Sets and Functions, Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 17, pp. 55–68, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Khayyal, F. A.,Biconvex Programming and Biconcave Minimization, D.Sc. Dissertation, Department of Operations Research, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Altman, M.,Bilinear Programming, Bulletin de l'Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Serie des Sciences Mathematiques, Astrophysiques et Physiques, Vol. 16, pp. 741–746, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kyparisis, J., andFiacco, A. V.,Generalized Convexity and Concavity of the Optimal Value Function in Nonlinear Programming, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 39, pp. 285–304, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luenberger, D. G.,Quasiconvex Programming, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 16, pp. 1090–1095, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rockafellar, R. T.,Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Behringer, F. E.,Discrete and Nondiscrete Quasiconvexlike Functions and Single Peakedness (Unimodality), Operationsforschung und Statistik, Series Optimization, Vol. 14, pp. 163–181, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Danskin, J. M.,The Theory of Max-Min, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chabrillac, Y., andCrouzeix, J. P.,Definiteness and Semidefiniteness of Quadratic Forms Revisited, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Vol. 63, pp. 283–292, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diewert, W. E., Avriel, M., andZang, I.,Nine Kinds of Quasiconvexity and Concavity, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 25, pp. 397–420, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crouzeix, J. P., andFerland, J. A.,Criteria for Quasiconvexity, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 18, pp. 349–352, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schaible, S.,Quasiconvex, Pseudoconvex, and Strictly Pseudoconvex Quadratic Functions, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 35, pp. 303–338, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berge, C.,Topological Spaces, Macmillan Publishers, New York, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by M. Avriel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

First, Z., Hackman, S.T. & Passy, U. Local-global properties of bifunctions. J Optim Theory Appl 73, 279–297 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940182

Key Words

Navigation