Skip to main content
Log in

Linear complementarity and discounted switching controller stochastic games

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The class of discounted switching controller stochastic games can be solved in one step by a linear complementarity program (LCP). Following the proof of this technical result is a discussion of a special formulation and initialization of a standard LCP pivoting algorithm which has, in numerical experiments, always terminated in a complementary solution. That the LCP algorithm as formulated always finds a complementary solution has not yet been proven, but these theoretical and experimental results have the potential to provide an alternative proof of the ordered field property for these games. Numerical experimentation with the reformulated LCP is reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raghavan, T. E. S., andFilar, J.,Algorithms for Stochastic Games—A Survey, Research Report 88-06, Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1988.

  2. Filar, J.,Ordered Field Property for Stochastic Games When the Player Who Controls Transitions Changes from State to State, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 34, pp. 505–517, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vrieze, O., Tijs, S., Raghavan, T. E. S., andFilar, J.,A Finite Algorithm for the Switching Controller Stochastic Games, OR Spektrum, Vol. 5, pp. 15–24, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Filar, J. A., andSchultz, T.,Bilinear Programming and Structured Stochastic Games, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 53, pp. 85–104, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mohan, S. R., andRaghavan, T. E. S.,An Algorithm for Discounted Switching Control Games, OR Spektrum, Vol. 9, pp. 41–45, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lemke, C.,Bimatrix Equilibrium Points and Mathematical Programming, Management Science, Vol. 11, pp. 681–689, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cottle, R., andDantzig, G.,Complementary Pivot Theory of Mathematical Programming, Linear Algebra and Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 103–125, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shapley, L.,Stochastic Games, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 39, pp. 1095–1100, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rothblum, U.,Solving Stopping Stochastic Games by Maximizing a Linear Function Subject to Quadratic Constraints, Game Theory and Related Topics, Edited by O. Moeschlin and D. Pallaschke, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Holland, pp. 103–105, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vrieze, O.,Stochastic Games with Finite State and Action Spaces, PhD Dissertation. Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raghavan, T. E. S., Tijs, S., andVrieze, O.,On Stochastic Games with Additive Reward and Transition Structure, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 47, pp. 451–464, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Filar, J., Schultz, T., Thijsman, D., andVrieze, O. J.,Nonlinear Programming and Stationary Equilibria in Stochastic Games, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 50, pp. 227–237, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mangasarian, O.,Linear Complementarity Problems Solvable by a Single Linear Program, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 10, pp. 263–270, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. L. Yu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schultz, T.A. Linear complementarity and discounted switching controller stochastic games. J Optim Theory Appl 73, 89–99 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940080

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940080

Key Words

Navigation