Skip to main content
Log in

On the classical logarithmic barrier function method for a class of smooth convex programming problems

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a natural implementation of the classical logarithmic barrier function method for smooth convex programming. It is assumed that the objective and constraint functions fulfill the so-called relative Lipschitz condition, with Lipschitz constantM>0.

In our method, we do line searches along the Newton direction with respect to the strictly convex logarithmic barrier function if we are far away from the central trajectory. If we are sufficiently close to this path, with respect to a certain metric, we reduce the barrier parameter. We prove that the number of iterations required by the algorithm to converge to an ε-optimal solution isO((1+M 2)\(\sqrt n \)∣logε∣) orO((1+M 2)n∣logε∣), depending on the updating scheme for the lower bound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frisch, R.,The Logarithmic Potential Method for Solving Linear Programming Problems, Memorandum, Institute of Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frisch, R.,The Logarithmic Potential Method of Convex Programming, Memorandum, Institute of Economics, Oslo, Norway, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parisot, G. R.,Résolution Numérique Approchée du Problème de Programmation Linèaire par Application de la Programmation Logarithmique, Revue Française de Recherche Opérationelle, Vol. 20, pp. 227–259, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lootsma, F. A.,Logarithmic Programming: A Method of Solving Nonlinear Programming Problems, Philips Research Reports, Vol. 22, pp. 329–344, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lootsma, F. A.,Constrained Optimization via Penalty Functions, Philips Research Reports, Vol. 23, pp. 408–423, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fiacco, A. V., andMcCormick, G. P.,Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques, Wiley, New York, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Polak, E.,Computational Methods in Optimization, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huard, P.,Resolution of Mathematical Programming with Nonlinear Constraints by the Methods of Centres, Nonlinear Programming, Edited by J. Abadie, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Holland, pp. 207–219, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lootsma, F. A.,Boundary Properties of Penalty Functions for Constrained Minimization, PhD Thesis, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Holland, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lootsma, F. A.,A Survey of Methods for Solving Constrained Minimization Problems via Unconstrained Minimization, Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Optimization, Edited by F. A. Lootsma, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karmarkar, N.,A New Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Linear Programming, Combinatorica, Vol. 4, pp. 373–395, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Todd, M. J.,Recent Developments and New Directions in Linear Programming, Technical Report No. 827, School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gill, P. E., Murray, W., Saunders, M. A., Tomlin, J. A., andWright, M. H.,On Projected Newton Barrier Methods for Linear Programming and an Equivalence to Karmarkar's Projective Method, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 36, pp. 183–209, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzaga, C. C.,An Algorithm for Solving Linear Programming Problems in O(n 3 L)Operations, Progress in Mathematical Programming: Interior Point Methods, Edited by N. Megiddo, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 1–28, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roos, C., andVial, J. P.,Long Steps with the Logarithmic Penalty Barrier Function in Linear Programming, Economic Decision Making: Games, Economics and Optimization, Edited by J. Gabszevwecz, J. F. Richard, and L. Wolsey, Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, Holland, pp. 433–441, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzaga, C. C.,Large-Steps Path-Following Methods for Linear Programming: Barrier Function Method, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 1, 1991.

  17. Renegar, J.,A Polynomial-Time Algorithm Based on Newton's Method for Linear Programming, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 40, pp. 59–93, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vaidya, P. M.,An Algorithm for Linear Programming Which Requires O(((m+n)n 2+(m+n)1.5 n)L)Arithmetic Operations, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 47, pp. 175–201, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Den Hertog, D., Roos, C., andTerlaky, T.,A Potential Reduction Variant of Renegar's Short-Step Path-Following Method for Linear Programming, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Vol. 152, pp. 43–68, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sonnevend, G.,An Analytical Centre for Polyhedrons and New Classes of Global Algorithms for Linear (Smooth, Convex) Programming, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Science, Vol. 84, pp. 866–876, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jarre, F.,On the Convergence of the Method of Analytic Centers when Applied to Convex Quadratic Programs, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 49, pp. 341–358, 1990/91.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jarre, F.,The Method of Analytic Centers for Smooth Convex Programs, PhD Thesis, Institut für Angewandte Mathematik und Statistik, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mehrotra, S., andSun, J.,An Interior Point Algorithm for Solving Smooth Convex Programs Based on Newton's Method, Technical Report No. 88-08, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nesterov, Yu. E., andNemirovsky, A. S.,Self-Concordant Functions and Polynomial Time Methods in Convex Programming, Central Economical and Mathematical Institute, USSR Academy of Science, Moscow, USSR, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Den Hertog, D., Roos, C., andTerlaky, T.,A Potential Reduction Method for a Class of Smooth Convex Programming Problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 2, 1992.

  26. Wolfe, P.,A Duality Theorem for Nonlinear Programming, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 19, pp. 239–244, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Megiddo, N.,Pathways to the Optimal Set in Linear Programming, Proceedings of the Mathematical Programming Symposium of Japan, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1–36, 1986.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Zirilli

on leave from Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Den Hertog, D., Roos, C. & Terlaky, T. On the classical logarithmic barrier function method for a class of smooth convex programming problems. J Optim Theory Appl 73, 1–25 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940075

Key Words

Navigation