Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 85–91 | Cite as

Ethanol production by nitrogen-deficient yeast cells immobilized in a hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor

  • Douglas S. Inloes
  • Alan S. Michaels
  • Channing R. Robertson
  • Abdul Matin


Cells ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 4126, immobilized within the macroporous walls of asymmetric hollow-fiber membranes, were alternately perfused with 10% glucose complex medium and with 10% glucose defined medium which was deficient in nitrogen. Using complex growth medium, ethanol productivities during the initial 10 h of culture attained a maximum level of 133 g/l-h based on the total fiber volume (3% ethanol). Productivities during nitrogen deficiency stabilized at 10 g/l-h (0.5 ethanol). In subsequent growth phases, ethanol production rates increased to levels 40–70% of initial growth-phase values, but the ability to regenerate the fermentation activity decreased with culture age. During nitrogen deficiency, the fermentation efficiency declined with a concomitant reduction in the total protein concentration of immobilized cells within the hollow-fiber membranes. The molar ratio of acetaldehyde to ethanol increased seven-fold during nitrogen deficiency, indicating that the overall decline in glycolytic activity was accompanied by preferential reduction in alcohol dehydrogenase activity. The molar ratio of glycerol to ethanol increased two-fold during nitrogen deficiency, and large lipid-like droplets accumulated within the nitrogen-deficient cells. In addition to these findings, we conclude that current hollow-fiber membrane reactors should be limited to cell cultures having low growth rates, low O2 requirements, and low CO2 production rates.


Ethanol Production Membrane Reactor Nitrogen Deficiency Ethanol Production Rate Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Betz H, Weiser U (1976) Protein degradation and proteinases during yeast sporulation. Eur J Biochem 62:65–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Betz H, Weiser U (1976) Protein degradation during yeast sporulation. Enzyme and cytochrome patterns. Eur J Biochem 70:385–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chen SL, Gutmanis F (1976) Carbon dioxide inhibition of yeast growth in biomass production. Biotechnol Bioeng 18:1455–1462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cysewski GR, Wilke CR (1976) Utilization of cellulosic materials through enzymatic hydrolysis. I. Fermentation of hydrolysate to ethanol and single-cell protein. Biotechnol Bioeng 18:1297–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cysewski GR, Wilke CR (1977) Rapid ethanol fermentations using vacuum and cell recycle. Biotechnol Bioeng 19:1125–1143Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    d'Avila SG, Silva RSF (1970) Isothermal vapor-liquid equilibrium data by total pressure method. J Chem Eng Data 15:421–424Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Halvorson H (1958) Intracellular protein and nucleic acid turnover in resting yeast cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 27:255–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Harrison JS, Graham JCJ (1970) Yeasts in distillery practice. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, Vol. 3, Yeast technology. Academic Press, London, pp 283–348Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hopper AK, Magee PT, Welch SK, Friedman M, Hall BD (1974) Macromolecule synthesis and breakdown in relation to sporulation and meiosis in yeast. J Bacteriol 119:619–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Inloes DS, Smith WJ, Taylor DP, Cohen SN, Michaels AS, Robertson CR (1983) Hollow-fiber membrane bioreactors using immobilizedE. coli for protein synthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:2653–2681Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Inloes DS, Taylor DP, Cohen SN, Michaels AS, Robertson CR (1983) Ethanol production bySaccharomyces cervisiae immobilized in hollow-fiber membrane bioreactors. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:264–278Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kierstan M, Bucke C (1977) The immobilization of microbial cells, subcellular organelles, and enzymes in calcium alginate gels. Biotechnol Bioeng 19:387–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Lopez S, Gancedo JM (1979) Effect of metabolic conditions on protein turnover in yeast. Biochem J 178:769–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Parr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Margaritis A, Wilke CR (1978) The rotorfementor. II. Application to ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 20:727–753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Oura E (1973) Energetics of yeast growth under different intensities of aeration. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 4:117–127Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Postgate JR (1967) Viability measurements and the survival of microbes under minimum stress. Adv Microbial Physiol 1:1–23Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Thomas KC, Dawson PSS (1980) Energy charge and nutrient recycling during phased growth ofCandida utilis. In: Continuous cultivation of microorganisms, Proceedings 7th Symposium, Prague, 1978. Academic Press, New York. pp 71–79Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Wada M, Kato J, Chibata I (1980) Continuous production of ethanol using immobilized growing yeast cells. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 10:275–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas S. Inloes
    • 1
  • Alan S. Michaels
    • 1
  • Channing R. Robertson
    • 1
  • Abdul Matin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical MicrobiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations