Advertisement

American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 603–617 | Cite as

Who enrolls in prevention trials? Discordance in perception of risk by professionals and participants

  • Ruth E. K. Stein
  • Laurie J. Bauman
  • Henry T. Ireys
Article

Conclusions

Experiences in our own Preventive intervention Research Center underscore that the way in which the program is presented may seriously influence which population subgroups are enrolled. Successful recruitment and retention often depend on whether there is congruence between the subjects' perceived needs and the stated agenda of the recruitment effort. Where there is discordance between the professionals' basis for concern and the client's agenda, there is potential for losing key segments of the target population. Solutions include recasting the intervention to maximize its relationship to the potential participants' perceived needs or integrating it into standard services. Research design should include collecting data from those who chose not to participate in the intervention or who drop out. Finally, it should be emphasized that many preventive interventions do not focus on risk status but use techniques intended to strengthen competence and skills and increase resiliency, and are directed at captive audiences or large scale populations (Roberts & Peterson, 1984). Such preventive interventions may be accepted on their intrinsic appeal or perceived merit, although they must avoid negative consequences and must not be viewed as too burdensome or they will discourage client participation. Regardless of the strategy selected, the only way to know the generalizability of the program is to collect data that provide an accurate description and documentation of how the sample and the intended target population differ.

Keywords

Target Population Preventive Intervention Prevention Trial Risk Status Intervention Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauman, L. J., Gervey, R., & Siegel, K. (in press). Factors associalcd with cancer patients' participation in support groups.Journal of Psychosocial Oncology.Google Scholar
  2. Bickman, L. (1983). The evaluation of prevention programs.Journal of Social Issues, 39, 181–207.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, B. L. (1979). Prevention of mental disorders: Recent advances in theory and practice.Community Mental Health Journal, 15, 179–191.Google Scholar
  4. Bolman, W., & Bolian, G. (1979). Crisis intervention as primary or secondary intervention. In I. Berlin & L. Stone (Eds.),Basic handbook of child psychiatry. Vol. 4: Prevention and current issues. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. T., & Kimmel, A. J. (1985).Guiding preventive intervention research centers for research validity. Final Report on Contract Number SSN 552-12-4531, Order Number 83M054244901D, Issued by DHHS, PHS, DMM, Room 5-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.Google Scholar
  6. Caplan, G. (1980). An approach to preventive intervention in child psychiatry.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 671–686.Google Scholar
  7. Fleischman, A. R. (1988, March).Ethical issues in preventive intervention research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Preventive Intervention Research Centers, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  8. Fontana, C., Fleischman, A., McCarton, C., Melter, A., & Ruff, H. (1989). A neonatal prevention intervention study: Issues of recruitment and retention.Journal of Primary Prevention, 9, 164–176.Google Scholar
  9. Gifford, P. (1986). The meaning of lumps: A case study of the ambiguities of risk. In C. R. Janes, R. Stall, & S. M. Gifford (Eds.),Anthropology and epidemiology (pp. 213–246). Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  10. Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, R. C., Klesges, L. M., & Somes, G. R. (1988). Variables associated with participation and outcome in a worksite smoking control program.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 617–620.Google Scholar
  11. Infant Health and Development Program. (1990). Enhancing the outcomes of low-birth-weight, premature infants. A multisite, randomized trial.Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 3035–3042.Google Scholar
  12. Jessop, D. J., & Stein, R. E. K. (1991). Who benefits from a pediatric home care program?Pediatrics. 88.Google Scholar
  13. Kirscht, J. (1974). The health belief model and illness behavior.Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 387–408.Google Scholar
  14. Kirscht, J., & Rosenstock, I. (1980). Patients' problems in following recommendations of health experts. In G. Stone, F. Cohen, N. Adler, & Associates (Eds.),Health psychology—A handbook. San Francisco: Josscy-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Lindy, J. D., Grace, M. C., & Green, B. L. (1981). Survivors: Outreach to a reluctant population.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 468–478.Google Scholar
  16. Lorion, R. P. (1982). Evaluating preventive interventions: Guidelines for the serious social change agent. In R. D. Felner, L. Jason, J. Moritsugu, & S. S. Farber (Eds.),Preventive psychology: Theory, research and practice. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  17. Madden, J., O'Hara, J., & Levenstein, P. (1984). Home again: Effects of the mother-child home program on mother and child.Child Development, 55, 636–647.Google Scholar
  18. Minde, K., Shosenberg, N., Marlon, P., Thompson, B., Ripley, B., & Burns, S. (1980). Self-help groups in a premature nursery—a controlled evaluation.Journal of Pediatrics, 96, 933–940.Google Scholar
  19. Mosher, L. R. (1983). Alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization. Why has research failed to be translated into practice?New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 1579–1580.Google Scholar
  20. Price, R. (1983). The education of a prevention psychologist. In R. D. Felner, L. Jason, J. Moritsugu, & S. S. Farber (Eds.),Preventive psychology: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  21. Price, R., & Smith, S. (1985). A guide to evaluating prevention programs in mental health (DHHS Publication No. ADM 85-1365). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, M. C., & Peterson, L. (1984). Prevention models. Theoretical and practical implications. In M. C. Roberts & L. Peterson (Eds.),Prevention of problems in childhood. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Rolf, J. E. (1985). Evolving adaptive theories and methods for prevention research with children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 631–646.Google Scholar
  24. Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1982).Evaluation. A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.Google Scholar
  26. Stein, R. E. K. (1990).Preventive Intervention Research Center for Child Health. Progress report—Year 08. New York: Albert Einstein College of Medicine.Google Scholar
  27. Stein, R. E. K., & Jessop, D. J. (1984). Does pediatric home care make a difference for children with chronic illness? Findings from the Pediatric Ambulatory Care Treatment Study.Pediatrics, 73, 845–853.Google Scholar
  28. Stein, R. E. K., & Jessop, D. J. (1987).Behavioral consequences of chronic childhood illness (Final report of grant to William T. Grant Foundation). New York: Albert Einstein College of Medicine.Google Scholar
  29. Vachon, M. L. S., Rogers, J., Freedman, L. S., & Freedman, S. J. J. (1980). A controlled study of self-help intervention for widows.American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1380–1384.Google Scholar
  30. Vinokur, A. D., Price, R. H., & Caplan, R. D. (1991). From field experiments to program implementation: Assessing the potential outcomes of an experimental intervention program for unemployed persons.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, in press.Google Scholar
  31. Weitzman, M., Albert, J. J., Klerman, L. V., Kayne, H., Lamb, G. A., Geromini, K. R., Kane, K. T., & Rose, L. (1986). High risk youth and health: The care of excessive school absence.Pediatrics, 78, 313–322.Google Scholar
  32. Weitzman, M., Gortmaker, S., & Sobol, A. (1990). Racial, social, and environmental risks for childhood asthma.American Journal of Diseases of Children, 144, 1189–1194.Google Scholar
  33. Zellen, M. (1979). A new design for randomized clinical trials.New England Journal of Medicine, 300, 1242–1245.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth E. K. Stein
    • 1
  • Laurie J. Bauman
    • 1
  • Henry T. Ireys
    • 1
  1. 1.Preventive Intervention Research Center for Child Health and the Department of PediatricsAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronx

Personalised recommendations