Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 174, Issue 1–2, pp 67–73 | Cite as

Electrophoretic study and genetic affinity in theCampanula elatines andC. fragilis (Campanulaceae) rock-plants group from Italy and W. Jugoslavia

  • G. Frizzi
  • F. Tammaro
Article

Abstract

Variability and genetic divergence of 11 field populations of seven species of theCampanula elatines andC. fragilis rock-plants group from the Mediterranean and pre-Alpine areas have been studied by starch-gel electrophoretic techniques.Campanula isophylla, C. elatines, C. elatinoides, C. fragilis subsp.fragilis and subs.cavolinii, C. garganica were collected in Italy, whilstC. fenestrellata subsp.istriaca andC. portenschlagiana came from W. Jugoslavia. Twelve enzymatic loci for each population were genetically analysed: PGI-1 and 2, PGM-2, IDH-1 and -2, SKDH, ME, ADH, GOT-2, MPI-1 and -2, SOD-1. The genetic distances among the above mentioned entities have been calculated by Nei's index and depicted in a dendrogram.

Key words

Angiosperms Campanulaceae Campanula isophylla C. elatines C. elatinoides C. fragilis subsp.fragilis and subsp.cavolinii C. garganica C. fenestrellata subsp.istriaca C. portenschlagiana Allozyme variation heterozygosity Flora of Italy and W. Jugoslavia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayala, F. J., Powell, J. R., Tracey, M. L., Mourao, C. A., Perez-Salas, S., 1972: Enzyme variability in theDrosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations ofDrosophila willistoni. — Genetics70: 113–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arietti, G., Fenaroli, L., Giacomini, V., 1955: Saggio su la distribuzione, ecologia e variabilità dellaCampanula elatinoides Moretti; endemismo insubrico. — Bergamo: Edizioni Orobiche.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, G., Sing, C. F., 1970: An introduction to isozyme techniques. — London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A. H. D., Nevo, E., Zohary, D., Dagon, O., 1978: Genetic variation in natural populations of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). — Genetica49: 97–108.Google Scholar
  5. Damboldt, J., 1965: Zytotaxonomische Revision der isophyllenCampanulae in Europa. — Bot. Jahrb.84: 302–358.Google Scholar
  6. Fedorov, An. A., 1976:Campanula L. — InTutin, T. G. & al., (Eds.): Flora Europaea4: 78–89. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Greuter, W., Burdet, H. H., Long, G., 1984:Campanula L. — Med Checklist1: 123–145.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, H., 1966: Enzyme polymorphism in man. — Proc. Roy. Soc. London169: 298–310.Google Scholar
  9. Lovasen-Eberhardt, Z., Trinajstic, I., 1978: O geografskoi distribuciji morfoloskih karakteristika vrsta serjeGarganicae rodaCampanula L. u fiori jugoslavije. — Biosistematika4: 273–280.Google Scholar
  10. Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Naturalist106: 238–292.Google Scholar
  11. Pignatti, S., 1982:Campanula L. — InPignatti, S., (Ed.): Flora d'Italia2: 662–702. — Bologna: Edagricole.Google Scholar
  12. Rothe, G., 1973: Shikimisäure-Dehydrogenase in keimenden Erbsen. — Biochem. Biophys. Pflanzen164: 475–486.Google Scholar
  13. Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S., Johnson, W. E., Gentry, J. B., 1971: Biochemical polymorphism in the genusPeromyscus. I. Variation in the old field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). — Stud. Genet.6: 49–90.Google Scholar
  14. Shaw, C. R., Prasad, R., 1970: Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes. A compilation of recipies. — Biochem. Genet.4: 297–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Frizzi
    • 1
  • F. Tammaro
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences Dept., Botanical Section, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of L'Aquila, Loc. CoppitoL'AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations