Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 156, Issue 1–2, pp 91–115 | Cite as

Evolution, pollination, and systematics of the tribeNeottieae (Orchidaceae)

  • Pamela Burns-Balogh
  • Dariusz L. Szlachetko
  • Amots Dafni
Article

Abstract

The various classifications of the orchid tribeNeottieae are reviewed and a new classification is proposed that divides the tribe into three subtribes,Neottiinae, Limodorinae, andCephalantherinae, based primarily on characters of the column (gynostemium). A cladistic analysis illustrates that these three subtribes are more closely related to one another than either is to any other group in subfam.Neottioideae, although there are very few apomorphic characters for the tribe. Pollination biology is also discussed showing links between breeding systems and distribution. There is also a possible role between column and labellum morphology and the emergence of a deceptive pollination syndrome from one of reward.

Key words

Angiosperms Neottieae Limodorinae Cephalantherinae Neottinae Listerinae Pollination evolutionary trends phylogenetics of orchids 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, J., Mesler, M., 1979: Pollination biology ofListera cordata (Orchidaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.66, 820–824.Google Scholar
  2. Balogh, P., 1982:Rhizanthella R. S. Rogers, a misunderstood genus (Orchidaceae). — Selbyana7, 27–33.Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, H., 1980:Cephalanthera ×schaberi hybr. nat. nov. — die erste bekannt gewordene Kreuzung zwischen einer gespornten und einer ungesporntenCephalanthera. — Mitt. Bl. Arb. Kr. Heim. Orchid. Baden-Württ.12, 110–122.Google Scholar
  4. , 1983:Cephalanthera ×taubenheimii hybr. nat. nov. — ein neuerCephalanthera Bastard aus der Osttürkei. — Mitt. Bl. Arb. Kr. Heim. Orchid. Baden-Württ.15, 217–226.Google Scholar
  5. , 1982: Die wildwachsenden Orchideen Europas. — Stuttgart: Kosmos.Google Scholar
  6. Beardsell, D., Bernhardt, P., 1983: Pollination biology of Australian terrestrial orchids. — InWilliams, E., Knox, R., Gilbert, J., Bernhardt, P., (Eds.): Pollination 1982. Parkville, Vic.: Univ. of Melbourne Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, K., 1970:Epipactis ×pupplingensis nov. hybr. — Jahresber. Naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal23, 114–116.Google Scholar
  8. Bentham, G., 1881: Notes onOrchideae. — J. Linn. Soc., Bot.18, 281–360.Google Scholar
  9. Bernhardt, P., Burns-Balogh, P., 1986: Floral mimesis inThelymitra nuda (Orchidaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.151, 187–202.Google Scholar
  10. Brantjes, N. B., 1981: Ant, bee and fly pollination inEpipactis palustris (L.)Crantz (Orchidaceae). — Acta Bot. Neerl.30, 59–68.Google Scholar
  11. Brieger, F. G., R. Maatsch, R., Senghas, K., 1974: TribusNeottieae. — InSchlechter, R., (Ed.): Die Orchideen, pp. 287–294. — Berlin, Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
  12. Burns-Balogh, P., Bernhardt, P., 1985: Evolutionary trends in the androecium of theOrchidaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.149, 119–134.Google Scholar
  13. -Funk, V., 1986: A phylogenetic analysis of theOrchidaceae. — Smithsonian Contributions to Botany. No.61, 79 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Camus, A., 1923: Note sur le ×Cephalanthera Schulzei G. Camus, Bergon etA. Camus. — Bull. Soc. Bot. France70, 451–453.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, Sing-Chi, 1965: A primitive new orchid genusTangtsinia and its meaning in phylogeny. — Acta Phyto. Sinica10, 193–206.Google Scholar
  16. , 1978:Sinorchis—a primitive new genus ofOrchidaceae from China. — Acta Phyto. Sinica16, 82–85.Google Scholar
  17. , 1979a: OnDiplandorchis, a very primitive and phylogenetically significant new genus ofOrchidaceae. — Acta Phyto. Sinica17, 6.Google Scholar
  18. , 1979b: The column types ofNeottia andArchineottia of the familyOrchidaceae and their taxonomic and phylogenetic significance. — Acta Phyto. Sinica17, 20–22.Google Scholar
  19. Clements, M., Cribb, P., 1984: The underground orchids of Australia. — Kew Magazine1, 84–91.Google Scholar
  20. Dafni, A., 1986: Pollination inOrchis and related genera: The evolution from reward to deception. — InArditti, J., (Ed.): Orchid Biology IV. — Cornell Univ. Press, (in press).Google Scholar
  21. , 1981: The flower biology ofCephalanthera longifolia (Orchidaceae)—Pollen imitation and facultative floral mimicry. — Pl. Syst. Evol.137, 224–240.Google Scholar
  22. Darwin, C., 1877: The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects. — London.Google Scholar
  23. Dressler, R., 1981: The orchids, Natural history and classification. — Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, E., 1934: (Letter to Poulton read at the Entomological Society of London meeting). — Proc. R. Ento. Soc.3, 82–83.Google Scholar
  25. Freyhold, E., 1877: Befruchtungsverhältnisse vonLimodorum abortivum (L.) Sw. — Verh. Bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenburg19, XXIII-XXVII.Google Scholar
  26. George, A., 1980:Rhizanthella gardneri R. S. Rogers—the underground orchid of Western Australia. — Amer. Orch. Soc. Bull.49, 631–646.Google Scholar
  27. -Cooke, J., 1981:Rhizanthella—the underground orchid of Western Australia. — Proc. Orch. Symp. 17th Int. Bot. Congress. Sydney. Australia, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
  28. Godfery, M., 1922: Notes on the fertilisation of orchids. — J. Bot. (London)60, 359–361.Google Scholar
  29. , 1924: ×Cephalanthera Schulzei. — Orchid Rev.32, 101–102.Google Scholar
  30. - 1933: Monograph and Iconograph of Native BritishOrchidaceae. — Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Hagerup, O., 1952: The morphology and biology of some primitive orchid flowers. — Phytomorphology2, 134–138.Google Scholar
  32. Ivri, Y., Dafni, A., 1977: The pollination ecology ofEpipactis consimilis Don (Orchidaceae) in Israel. — New Phytol.79, 173–177.Google Scholar
  33. Judd, W. W., 1972: Wasps (Vespidae) pollinating Helleborine,Epipactis helleborine (L.)Crantz, at Owen Sound, Ontario. — Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ontario102, 115–118.Google Scholar
  34. Kalopissis, J. T., Robatsch, K., 1980:Epipactis cretica Kalopisses etRobatsch, spec. nov. ein neuer kretischer Endemit. — Orchidee31, 141–143.Google Scholar
  35. Kirchner, O., 1900: Mitteilungen über Bestäubungseinrichtungen der Blüten. — Jahreshefte Ver. Vaterl. Nat. Kunde Württemberg56, 354–357.Google Scholar
  36. , 1922: Über Selbstbestäubung bei den Orchideen. — Flora15, 103–123.Google Scholar
  37. Kunth, P., 1909: Handbook of Flower Pollination, vol. III. Trans. J. R. Ainsworth Davis. — Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Kullenberg, B., Bergstroem, G., 1975: Chemical communication between living organisms. — Endeavour34, 59–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lang, D. C., Lansberg, J. L. S., 1978:Cephalanthera damasonium (Mill.)Druce ×C. longifolia (L.)Fritsch. — Watsonia12, 43–50.Google Scholar
  40. Lindley, J., 1830–1840: The Genera and Species of Orchidaceous plants. — London: Ridgways.Google Scholar
  41. Magrou, J., 1921: Symbiose et tuberisation. — Ann. Sci. Nat. (Paris)10, 181–197, 234–264.Google Scholar
  42. Mesler, M., Ackerman, J., Lu, K., 1980: The effectiveness of fungus gnats as pollinators. — Amer. J. Bot.67, 574–567.Google Scholar
  43. Nilsson, L. A., 1978: Pollination ecology ofEpipactis palustris (Orchidaceae). — Bot. Notiser131, 355–368.Google Scholar
  44. , 1981a: The pollination ecology ofListera ovata (Orchidaceae). — Nordic J. Bot.1, 461–480.Google Scholar
  45. - 1981b: Pollination ecology and evolutionary processes in six species of orchids. — Acta Univ. Uppsal.593.Google Scholar
  46. , 1983: Mimesis of bellflower (Campanula) by the red Helleborine orchidCephalanthera rubra. — Nature305, 799–800.Google Scholar
  47. Pedicino, N., 1874: Sul processo d'impollinazione e qualche altro fatto melLimodorum abortivum Swartz. — Rend. R. Acad. Sci. Napoli13, 118–120.Google Scholar
  48. Peitz, E., 1970: NeuerEpipactis Bastard. — Orchidee21, 180–181.Google Scholar
  49. Pfitzer, E., 1887: Zur organophyletischen Natur des Orchideenlabellums. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst. Pflanzengeog.84, 175–214.Google Scholar
  50. Pijl, van der L., Dodson, C. H., 1966: Orchid flowers, their pollination and evolution. — Coral Gables: Univ. Miami Press.Google Scholar
  51. Porter, E. M., 1836: Note on the pollination ofEpipactis viridifolia. — Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)22, 250.Google Scholar
  52. Prochazka, F., Velisek, V., 1983: Orchideje Nasi Prirody. — Praha.Google Scholar
  53. Proctor, M., Yeo, P., 1973: The Pollination of Flowers. — London: The New Naturalist.Google Scholar
  54. Rasmussen, F., 1982: The gynostemium of the Neottioid orchids. — Opera Bot.65, 1–96.Google Scholar
  55. Reinhard, H. R., 1977: Autogamie bei europäischen Orchideen. — Orchidee28, 178–182.Google Scholar
  56. Renz, J., 1972: ÜberLimodorum trabutianum Batt. — Candollea27, 41–45.Google Scholar
  57. Richards, A. J., 1982: The influence of minor structural changes in the flower on the breeding systems and speciation inEpipactis Zinn. (Orchidaceae). — InArmstrong, J. A., Powell, J. M., Richards, A. J., (Eds.): Pollination and Evolution, pp. 47–53. — Sydney.Google Scholar
  58. Robatsch, K., 1983: Blütenbiologie und Autogamie der GattungEpipactis. — Jahresber. Naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal36, 25–32.Google Scholar
  59. Rube, G., Heise, K., 1976:Epipactis ×stephensonii Godf. (Epipactis helleborine ×Epipactis leptochila) in Osthessen. — Orchidee27, 196–198.Google Scholar
  60. Rupp, H. M., 1943: The orchids of New South Wales. — Sydney.Google Scholar
  61. Schlechter, R., 1926: Das System der Orchidaceen. — Notizbl. Jahrb. Syst., Pflanzengesch. Pflanzengeog.45, 375–410.Google Scholar
  62. Seidenfaden, G., 1978: Orchid genera in Thailand VI.Neottioideae Lindl. — Dansk Bot. Ark.32, 116–119.Google Scholar
  63. Stebbins, G. L., 1951: Variation and Evolution in Plants. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  64. Szafer, W., 1969: Kwiaty i zwierzgta (The flowers and the animals). — Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
  65. Veyret, Y., 1981: L'ovule au cours de la vie des fleurs non pollinisées chez lesOrchideae et lesNeottieae (Orchidaceae). — Bull. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. Paris., ser. 3, sect. B4, 179–184.Google Scholar
  66. Wettstein, R. V., 1889: Untersuchungen beiNigritella angustifolia Rich. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.7, 306–317.Google Scholar
  67. Wiefelspuetz, W., 1970: Über die Blütenbiologie der GattungEpipactis. — Jahresber. Naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal23, 53–69.Google Scholar
  68. Young, D. P., 1962a: Studies in the BritishEpipactis. V.Epipactis leptochila; with some notes onE. dunensis andE. mulleri. — Watsonia5, 136–139.Google Scholar
  69. , 1962b: Studies in the BritishEpipactis VI. Some further notes onE. phyllanthes. — Watsonia5, 136–139.Google Scholar
  70. , 1970: Bestimmung und Verbreitung der autogamenEpipactis-Arten. — Jahresber. Naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal23, 43–52.Google Scholar
  71. Young, D., Renz, J., 1958:Epipactis leptochila Godf. — Its occurrence in Switzerland and its relationship to otherEpipactis species. — Bauhinia1 (2), 151–156.Google Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, W., 1917–1918:Epipactis (Cephalanthera)alba ×longifolia. — Allg. Bot. Z.23/24, 42–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Burns-Balogh
    • 1
  • Dariusz L. Szlachetko
    • 2
  • Amots Dafni
    • 3
  1. 1.Inter Documentation CompanyLeidenNetherlands
  2. 2.Department of Plant Ecology and Nature ProtectionUniversity of GdanskGdyniaPoland
  3. 3.Institute of EvolutionHaifa UniversityMt. Carmel, HaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations