Abstract
A plant collected in South Africa in the early 1960's has been considered an intergeneric hybrid with the parental taxa beingRuspolia hypocrateriformis (Vahl)Milne-Redhead var.australis Milne-Redhead andRuttya ovata Harv. The intermediate morphology of the plant provided the strongest evidence of its hybrid origin. The natural hybrid, named formally as ×Ruttyruspolia A. Meeuse & de Wet, is highly sterile. Crosses between the two presumed parental taxa produced two plants that are very similar to the putative natural hybrid. We had examined the presumed parental species and the natural and artificial hybrids using enzyme electrophoresis. The two parental species are highly differentiated at genes specifying soluble enzymes; they have a genetic identity of 0.51. They have no common alleles at two genes, and contain alternative alleles in very different frequencies at two loci.Ruttya andRuspolia exhibit both unique and common alleles at two additional genes. The natural and artificially produced plants of ×Ruttyruspolia are identical electrophoretically and contain alleles unique to each of the parental species at two genes. In addition, individuals of ×Ruttyruspolia combine alternative high frequency alleles from each parent at two loci. Allozymes provide strong confirming evidence for the hybrid origin of naturally occurring ×Ruttyruspolia because the products of specific alleles either unique to or highly characteristic of the two putative parental taxa are found combined in ×Ruttyruspolia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crawford, D. J., 1983: Phylogenetic and systematic inference from electrophoretic studies. — InTanksley, T. J., (Eds.): Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Pt. A., pp. 257–287. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.
—, 1985: Electrophoretic data and plant speciation. — Syst. Bot.10, 405–416.
Davis, B. J., 1964: Disc-electrophoresis II. Methods and application to human serum proteins. — Ann. New York Acad. Sci.121, 404–427.
Gallez, G. P., Gottlieb, L. D., 1982: Genetic evidence for the hybrid origin of the diploid plantStephanomeria diegensis. — Evolution36, 1158–1167.
Gottlieb, L. D., 1977: Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.65, 161–1980.
—, 1981a: Gene number in species ofAstereae that have different chromosome numbers. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA78, 3726–3729.
—, 1981b: Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. — InReinhold, L. & al., (Eds.): Progress in Phytochemistry7, pp. 1–46. — New York: Pergamon Press.
—, 1982: Conservation and duplication of isozymes in plants. — Science216, 373–380.
Meeuse, A. D. J., de Wet, J. M. J., 1965: ×Ruttyruspolia, a natural intergeneric hybrid inAcanthaceae. — Bothalia7, 439–441.
Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between plant populations. — Amer. Nat.106, 283–293.
Obermeyer, A. A., 1971: ×Ruttyruspolia “Phyllis Van Heerden”. — InCodd, L. E., (Ed.): The Flowering Plants of Africa41, 1622.
Rieseberg, L., Soltis, D. E., 1985: Allozymic differentiation betweenTolmiea menziesii andTellima grandiflora (Saxifragaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.72, 966–967. (Abstract)
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., 1986: Intergeneric hybridization betweenConimitella williamsii andMitella stauropetala (Saxifragaceae). — Syst. Bot.11, 293–297.
—, 1983: Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers and staining schedules. — Amer. Fern J.73, 9–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowrey, T.K., Crawford, D.J. Electrophoretic confirmation of the intergeneric hybrid ×Ruttyruspolia (Acanthaceae). Pl Syst Evol 158, 29–35 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936142
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936142