Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic relationships and gene flow between sympatric diploid and tetraploid plants ofDactylis glomerata (Gramineae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships between sympatric, morphologically indistinguishable diploid and tetraploid plants ofDactylis glomerata L. (Gramineae) in Galicia (Spain) were assessed using allozyme markers for 6 distinct systems. The study exploited recent introduction in Galicia and subsequent hybridization of an alien 4xDactylis subspecies possessing distinct allozymes from those of all the native plants. Opportunities for gene exchanges between the ploidies were estimated from in situ observations of flowering, examination of progenies in 2x/4x natural and experimental crosses, and enzyme analyses. Results show a high genetic similarity between the Galician diploids and tetraploids, which possess peculiar alleles in common. Although the ploidy levels usually have distinct flowering periods, interploidal crosses do occasionally occur. Gene flow is likely much more important from the diploid to the tetraploid level. A good genetic intermixing occurs between the Galician and the alien tetraploid entities which have simultaneous flowering. Autopolyploidization of the diploids followed by various rates of hybridization is proposed as one very probable origin of natural tetraploids inDactylis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardouin, P., 1985: Analyse, par la biochimie flavonique, de la stucture génétique et de l'organisation évolutive d'un complexe polyploide,Dactylis glomerata L. (Gramineae). — Spe. Thesis, Université Claude Bernard (Lyon 1), No. 1652, Lyon, France.

  • —,Fiasson, J. L., Jay, M., Lumaret, R., Hubac, J. M., 1985: Chemical diversification within theDactylis glomerata L. polyploid complex (Gramineae). — InJacquard, P., & al., (Eds.): Genetic differentiation and dispersal in plants. — NATO ASI Series G5: p. 3–15. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Jay, M., Lumaret, R., 1987: Étude d'une situation de sympatrie entre diploides et tétraploides sur la base du polymorphisme enzymatique et phénolique. — Canad. J. Bot.65: 526–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, E., 1985: Evolution dans les complexes autopolyploides. Exemple deDactylis glomerata L. — Étude comparative de la structure génétique des populations dans deux situations de contact entre diploides et tétraploides. — Thesis. Univ. Sci. Tech. Languedoc, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrill, M., 1978: Evolution and genetic resources in cocksfoot. — Ann. Report Welsh Plant Breeding Station (Aberystwyth, G.B.), 1977: 190–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Lindner, R., 1971: Diploid-tetraploid sympatry inDactylis (Gramineae). — New Phytol.70: 1111–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. P., Borrill, M., 1965: Tetraploid hybrids from crosses between diploid and tetraploid (Dactylis and their significance. — Genetica36: 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casler, M. D., Hugessen, P. M., 1988: Performance of tetraploid progeny derived from 2x–4x inter-subspecific crosses inDactylis glomerata L. — Genome30: 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorton, K. H., Young, N. R., 1980: List of grass ecotypes collected in July and August 1977 in Galicia, NW. Spain. — Report Welsh Plant Breeding Station (Aberystwyth, G.B.): 1–23.

  • Grant, V., 1981: Plant speciation, 2nd edn. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., Borrill, M., 1962: Chromosomal status, gene exchange and evolution inDactylis, 3. The role of the inter-ploid hybrids. — Genetica32: 296–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., 1983: The neutral theory of molecular evolution. — InNei, M., Koehn, R. K., (Eds.): Evolution of genes and proteins, pp. 208–233. — Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L., Legendre, P., 1979: Écologie numérique. 1, le traitement multiple de données écologiques. 2, la structure des données écologiques, Écologie12 and13. — Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1983: Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. — Amer. Naturalist122: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. H., 1976: Temporal adaptation correlated with ploidy inClaytonia virginica. — Syst. Bot.1: 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumaret, R., 1981a: Structure génétique d'un complexe polyploîde:Dactylis glomerata L. (Fam. Graminacées). Relations entre le polymorphisme enzymatique et certains aspects de la biologie, de l'écologie et de l'évolution de l'espèce. — State D. Thesis, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981b: Étude de l'hérédité de phosphatases acides chez le Dactyle (Dactylis glomerata L.) diploïde et tétraploïde. — Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.23: 513–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Protein variation in diploid and tetraploid orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.), formal genetics and population polymorphism of peroxidases and malate dehydrogenases. — Genetica57: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985: Phenotypic and genotypic variation within and between populations of the polyploid complex,Dactylis glomerata L. — InHaeck, J., Woldendorp, J. W., (Eds.): Phenotypic and genotypic variation in plant populations, pp. 343–345. — Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1986: Doubled duplication of the structural gene for cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase in theDactylis glomerata L. polyploid complex. — Mol. Biol. Evol.3: 499–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988a: Cytology, genetics and evolution in the genusDactylis. — C.R.C. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.7: 55–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988b: Invasion of natural pastures by a cultivated grass (Dactylis glomerata L.) in Galicia (Spain): process and consequence on plant cattle interactions. — Indi Castri, F., (Ed.): History and patterns of biological invasions, pp. 389–395. — Dortrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988c: Adaptive strategies and ploidy levels. — Acta Oecol., Oecol. Plant.9: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Valdeyron, G., 1978: Les glutamate-oxaloacétate transaminases du dactyle (Dactylis glomerata L.), génétique formelle d'un locus. — Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris287: 705–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Hanotte, C., 1987: Mise en évidence d'un écotype de dactyle (Dactylis glomerata L.) de pelouses dolomitiques subalpines dans les Grisons (Suisse). Origine et échanges géniques avec des dactyles de prairies adjacentes. — Acta Oecol., Oecol. Plant.8: 3–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Guillerm, J. L., Delay, J., Loutfi, A., Izco, J., Jay, M., 1987a: Polyploidy and habitat differentiation inDactylis glomerata L. from Galicia (Spain). — Oecologia73: 436–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, —,Barrientos, E., Jay, M., Fiasson, J. L., Ardouin, P., Delay, J., Loutfi, A., Izco, J., Amigo, J., 1987b: Signification évolutive de la polyploidie infraspécifique: cas des dactyles diploides et tétraploides de Galice. — InLegay, J. J., (Ed.): Biologie des populations, évaluation et prospective, pp. 129–133. — Lyon: I.A.S.B.S.E. Université Claude Bernard (Lyon 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Naturalist106: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niqueux, M., Arnaud, K., 1981: Peut-on prévoir la date d'épiaison des variétés de graminées. — Fourrages88: 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebischung, J., 1962: Études sur la croissance et le développement du dactyle (Dactylis glomerata L.). — Ann. Amélior. Plants12: 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W., 1963: The mathematical theory of communication. — Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., Rieseberg, L. H., 1986: Autopolyploidy inTolmiea menziesii (Saxifragaceae): genetic insights from enzyme electrophoresis. — Amer. J. Bot.73: 310–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1950: Variation and evolution in plants. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1956: Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass family. — Amer. J. Bot.43: 890–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. — Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Polyploidy in plants: unsolved problems and prospects. — InLewis, W. H., (Ed.): Polyploidy, biological relevance, pp. 495–520. — New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Zohary, D., 1959: Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies in the genusDactylis. 1. Morphology, distribution and interrelationships of the diploid subspecies. — Univ. California Bull. Bot.31: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Santen, E., Casler, M. D., 1986: Evaluation of indirect ploidy indicators inDactylis L. subspecies. — Crop Sci.26: 848–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, D., Nur, U., 1959: Natural triploids in orchard grassDactylis glomerata L. polyploid complex and their significance for gene flow from diploid to tetraploid levels. — Evolution13: 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lumaret, R., Barrientos, E. Phylogenetic relationships and gene flow between sympatric diploid and tetraploid plants ofDactylis glomerata (Gramineae). Pl Syst Evol 169, 81–96 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935987

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935987

Key words

Navigation