Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of purifiedanaplasma marginale initial bodies as a vaccine against anaplasmosis

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anaplasma marginale initial bodies of the Florida strain were purified from infected erythrocytes using a combination of ultrasonic disruption, nonionic detergent and differential centrifugation. Immunochemical analysis revealed at least 12A. marginale proteins in the molecular mass (m) range 81–15 kDa with a prominent band at 38 kDa. Several of these proteins remained insoluble in the presence of nonionic detergent. Preparations of purifiedAnaplasma initial bodies contained negligible erythrocytic contamination, as confirmed by the minimal induction of isoantibodies against bovine blood group antigens and the absence of delayed-type hypersensitivity to erythrocytic antigens in immunized animals. A total of 33 crossbred and purebred Holstein cattle were vaccinated with either 1.5, 1.0, or 0.1 mg protein of intact initial bodies, or with 1.0 mg of solubilizedAnaplasma protein. The immunogens were supplemented with 3.0 mg Quil-A saponin adjuvant and administered in 2 subcutaneous injections given at a 4-week interval. A similar number of nonvaccinated cattle served as controls. Three months after vaccination, all cattle were challenged by inoculation of 109 virulenta. marginale of either the homologous (Florida) or heterologous (Venezuelan) strains. Vaccinated cattle showed solid protection after homologous and heterologous challenge, characterized by parasite clearance and minimal hematocrit reductions. Initial data from four field vaccine trials revealed a reduced incidence of clinical anaplasmosis among immunized animals. Use of immunogens consisting of purifiedA. marginale initial bodies offers a potential immunoprophylactic approach to control of bovine anaplasmosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JH, Smith RD (1988) Differential extraction of antigens ofAnaplasma marginale. Am J Vet Res 49:257–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbet AF, Anderson LW, Palmer GH, McGuire TC (1983) Comparison of proteins synthesized by two different isolates ofAnaplasma marginale. Infect Immun 40:1068–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomford R (1980) The comparative selectivity of adjuvants for humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Clin Exp Immunol 39:426–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomford R (1989) Adjuvants for anti-parasite vaccines. Parasitol Today 5:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • BOSTID (1982) Priorities in biotechnology research for international development (Board on Science and Technology for International Development, National Research Council), National Academy Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson CA, Sells DM, Ristic M (1976) Cutaneous hypersensitivity and isoantibody production in cattle injected with live or inactivatedAnaplasma marginale in bovine and ovine erythrocytes. Am J Vet Res 37:1059–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RA, O'Hara PJ, Young MF, Dorris KD (1970) Neonatal immunohemolytic anemia and icterus of calves. JAVMA 150:1801–1803

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray DWR, Morris PJ (1987) The use of fluorescein diacetate and ethidium bromide as a viability stain for isolated islets of Langerhans. Stain Technol 62:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart LT, Swan AT, Larson A, Faget V McCorkle-Shirley SC (1981) Use ofAnaplasma marginale devoid of host cell antigen as a vaccine for anaplasmosis In: Hidalgo RJ, Jones EW (eds) 7th Nat. Anaplasmosis Conf, Mississippi State Univesity Press, Mississippi, pp 495–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart LT, Todd WJ, Luther DG (1988)Anaplasma marginale antigen, antigen composition, vaccine and process for the production of said antigen, antigen composition and vaccine. US Pat Appl. A Hy DK T No. 102

  • Kuttler KL, Zaugg JL, Johnson LW (1984) Serologic and clinical responses of premunized, vaccinated and previously infected cattle to challenge exposure by two differentA. marginale isolates. Am J Vet Res 45:2223–2226

    Google Scholar 

  • Laemmli V (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry O, Rosebrough N, Farr A, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurements with the Folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:250–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther DG, Hart LT, Todd WJ, Morris NG, Taylor ND, McRae JW (1989) Field study of an experimental anaplasmosis vaccine on pregnant cows and neonatal isoerythrolysis. Proc. 8th Natl Vet Hemoparasit Dis Conf, St. Louis, MO April 10–12. pp. 559–562

  • McColm AA, Bomford R, Dalton L (1982) A comparison of saponin with other adjuvants for the potentiation of protective immunity by a killedPlasmodium yoelii vaccine in the mouse. Parasite Immunol 4:337–347

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire TC, Palmer GH, Goff WL, Johnson MI, Davis WC (1984) Detection of common and isolate restricted antigens ofAnaplasma marginale using monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 45:697–700

    Google Scholar 

  • McHardy N, Gilson C (1974) An electron microscopic study of diagnostic antigens prepared fromAnaplosma marginale. Z Trop Parasit 25:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro S, James MA, Levy MG, Prestor MD, Esparza H, Ristic M (1981) Utilization of culture-derived soluble antigen in the latex agglutination test for bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Vet Parasitol 8:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro-James S, James MA, Ristic M (1985) Modified indirect fluorescent antibody test for the serodiagnosis ofAnaplasma marginale infections in cattle. Am J vet Res 40:2401–2403

    Google Scholar 

  • Morval GM (1974) A comparison of the adjuvant effects of saponin and oil emulsion in foot-and-mouth vaccnes for cattle. Bull Off Int Epizootiol 81:1319–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman B (1981) Treatment and control of anaplasmosis: An overview. In: Hidalgo RJ, Jones EW (eds) Proc 7th Nat Anaplasmosis, Mississippi State University Press, Mississippi, pp 543–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Orenstein WA, Bernier RH, Dondero TJ, Hinman AR, Marks JS, Bart KJ, Sirotkin B (1985) Field evaluation of vaccine efficacy. Bull WHO 63:1055–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer GH, McGuire TC (1984) Immune serum againstAnaplasma marginale initial bodies neutralizes infectivity for cattle. J Immunol 133:1010–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer GH, Barbet AF, Davis WC, McGuire TC (1986) Immunization with an isolate-common surface protein protects eattle against anaplasmosis. Science 231:1299–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer GH, Barbet AF, Musoke AJ, Katende JM, Rurangirwa V, Shkap V, Pipano E, Davis WC, McGuire TC (1988a) Recognition of conserved surface protein epitopes onAnaplasma centrale andAnaplasma marginale isolates from Israel, Kenya and the United States. Int J Parasitol 18:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer GH, Oberle SM, Barbet AF, Goff WL, Davis WC, McGuire TC (1988b) Immunization of cattle with a 36-kilodalton surface protein induces protection agairst homologous and heterologousAnaplasma marginale challenge. Infect Immun 56:1520–1531

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer GH, Barbet AF, Cantor GH, McGuire TC (1989) Immunization of cattle with the MSP-1 surface protein complex induces protection against a structurally variantAnaplasma marginale isolate. Infect Immun 57:3666–3669

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristic M, Carson CA (1973) Methods of immunoprophylaxis against bovine anaplasmosis with emphasis on use of the attenuatedAnaplasma marginale vaccine. In: Miller LH, Pino JA, McKelvey JJ (eds) Immunity to Blood Parasite of Animals and Man, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, pp 151–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristic M, Sibinovic S, Welter CJ (1968) An attenuatedAnaplasma marginale vaccine. Proc 72nd Meet U.S. Livestock Sanit Assoc, New Orleans, LA, pp 56–79

  • Tsang VCM, Peralta JM, Simons AR (1983) Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot techniques (EITB) for studying the specificities of antigens and antibodies separated by gel electrophoresis. Meth Enzymol 92:377–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizcaino O, Corrier DE, Terry MK, Carson CA, Lee AJ, Kuttler KL, Ristic M, Trevino GS (1980) Comparison of three methods of immunization against bovine anaplasmosis: Evaluation of protection afforded against field challenge exposure. Am J Vet Res 41:1060–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells PW, Emery DL, Hinson CA, Morrison WI, Murray M (1982) Immunization of cattle with a variant-specific surface antigen ofTrypanosoma brucei: Influence of different adjuvants. Infect Immun 36:1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montenegro-James, S., James, M.A., Toro Benitez, M. et al. Efficacy of purifiedanaplasma marginale initial bodies as a vaccine against anaplasmosis. Parasitol Res 77, 93–101 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935421

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935421

Keywords

Navigation