Skip to main content
Log in

Partitioning of variance and estimation of genetic parameters for various bristle number characters ofDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Phenotypic variance for each of several bristle number characters (abdominal, sternopleural, second and third coxal) was partitioned using both hierarchal and dialled designs. Heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated from parent-offspring regressions and correlations and half-sib correlations.

A high proportion of the genetic variance for abdominal bristle number was due to epistatic and sex-linked gene action, but most of the genetic variance for the other characters was additive autosomal.

The genetic correlations among sternopleural, and second and third coxal bristle numbers were all high, but that between abdominals and sternopleurals was low, while those between abdominals and either second or third coxals were virtually zero. An appreciable proportion of the covariance between abdominal and sternopleural bristle numbers was non-additive genetic.

The diallel method gave more reliable estimates of genetic parameters when non-additive or sex-linked genetic variation was present.

Zusammenfassung

Für eine Anzahl verschiedener Borstenzahl-Charaktere (abdominales, sternopleurales, 2. und 3. coxales Segment) wurde die phänotypische Varianz unter Verwendung hierarchischer und dialleler Versuchsanlagen unterteilt. Anhand von Elter-Nachkommen-Regressionen und-Korrelationen und von Halbgeschwister-Korrelationen wurden Heritabilitäten und genetische Korrelation geschätzt.

Ein hoher Anteil der genetischen Varianz für die Zahl abdominaler Borsten wurde durch epistatische Effekte und die Wirkung geschlechtsgekoppelter Gene bedingt. Bei den anderen Charakteren war der größte Anteil der genetischen Varianz additiv autosomal.

Die genetische Korrelation zwischen der Zahl der Borsten sternopleural und 2. und 3. Segment coxal war durchweg hoch, zwischen abdominal und sternopleural niedrig und zwischen abdominal und sowohl 2. und 3. coxal praktisch gleich null.

Ein bemerkenswerter Anteil der Covarianz zwischen der Zahl abdominaler und sternopleuraler Borsten war nicht-additiv genetisch.

Die Diallel-Methode ergab zuverlässigere Schätzungen der genetischen Parameter, wenn nicht-additive oder geschlechtsgebundene genetische Variation vorlag.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Becker, W. A.: Manual of procedures in quantitative genetics. Pullman, Washington: Washington State University 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beilharz, R. G.: On the possibility that sex-chromosomes have a greater effect than autosomes on inheritance. J. Genetics58, 441–449 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohidar, N. R.: Derivation and estimation of variance and covariance components associated with covariance between relatives under sexlinked transmission. Biometrics20, 505–521 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Claringbold, P. J., andJ. S. F. Barker: The estimation of relative fitness ofDrosophila populations. J. Theoret. Biol.1, 190–203 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton, G. A., J. A. Morris andA. Robertson: An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory I. Short-term responses to selection. J. Genetics55, 131–151 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dawson, P. S.: Estimation of components of phenotypic variance for developmental rate inTribolium. Heredity20, 403–417 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisen, E. J. andJ. E. Legates: Genotype-sex interaction and the genetic correlation between the sexes for body weight inMus musculus. Genetics54, 611–623 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Falconer, D. S.: Introduction to quantitative genetics. Edinburgh-London: Oliver and Boyd 1960.

  9. Frankham, R.: Studies in quantitative genetics and selection theory inDrosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney (1967).

  10. Griffing, B.: Accommodation of linkage in mass selection theory. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.13, 501–526 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Griffing, B.: Influence of sex on selection I. Contribution of sex-linked genes. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.18, 1157–1170 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kearsey, M. J.: Biometrical analysis of a random mating population: a comparison of five experimental designs. Heredity20, 205–235 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Latter, B. D. H.: Selection for a threshold character inDrosophila I. An analysis of the phenotypic variance on the underlying scale. Genet. Res.5, 198–210 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lerner, I. M.: Population genetics and animal improvement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lush, J. L.: Heritability of quantitative characters in farm animals. Proc. 8th Congr. Genetics (Hereditas Suppl.) 1949, 356–375.

  16. Mode, C. J., andH. F. Robinson: Pleiotropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics15, 518–537 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reeve, E. C. R.: The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics11, 357–374 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reeve, E. C. R., andF. W. Robertson: Studies in quantitative inheritance. VI. Sternite chaeta number inDrosophila, a metameric quantitative character. Z. indukt. Abstamm.-u. Vererb Lehre86, 269–288 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rendel, J. M.: Correlation between the number of scutellar and abdominal bristles inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics48, 391–408 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson, F. W.: Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Genetics55, 428–443 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robertson, F. W.: Changing the relative size of the body parts ofDrosophila by selection. Genet. Res.3, 169–180 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffer, H. E., andK. Kojima: Sex-linked inheritance of a quantitative trait ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics48, 775–786 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheldon, B. L.: Studies in artificial selection of quantitative characters I. Selection for abdominal bristles inDrosophila melanogaster. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.16, 490–515 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spector, W. S. (Ed.): Handbook of Biological Data. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tallis, G. M.: Sampling errors of genetic correlation coefficients calculated from analyses of variance and covariance. Aust. J. Statistics1, 35–43 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Vleck, L. D., andC. R. Henderson: Empirical sampling estimates of genetic correlations. Biometrics17, 359–371 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yule, G. U., andM. G. Kendall: An introduction to the theory of statistics. London: Charles Griffin and Company Limited 1950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheridan, A.K., Frankham, R., Jones, L.P. et al. Partitioning of variance and estimation of genetic parameters for various bristle number characters ofDrosophila melanogaster . Theoret. Appl. Genetics 38, 179–187 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935264

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935264

Keywords

Navigation