Skip to main content
Log in

On the gradient-projection method for solving the nonsymmetric linear complementarity problem

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Levitin-Poljak gradient-projection method is applied to solve the linear complementarity problem with a nonsymmetric matrixM, which is either a positive-semidefinite matrix or aP-matrix. Further-more, if the quadratic functionx T(Mx + q) is pseudoconvex on the feasible region {xR n |Mx + q ≥ 0,x≥0}, then the gradient-projection method generates a sequence converging to a solution, provided that the problem has a solution. For the case when the matrixM is aP-matrix and the solution is nondegenerate, the gradient-projection method is finite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cottle, R. W., andDantzig, G. B.,Complementary Pivot Theory of Mathematical Programming, Linear Algebra and Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 103–125, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lemke, C. E.,Bimatrix Equilibrium Points and Mathematical Programming, Management Science, Vol. 11, pp. 681–689, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murty, K. G.,Computational Complexity of Complementary Pivot Method, Mathematical Programming Study, Vol. 7, pp. 61–73, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertsekas, D. P.,On the Goldstein-Levitin-Poljak Gradient-Projection Method, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. AC-21, pp. 174–184, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levitin, E. S., andPoljak, B. T.,Constrained Minimization Problems, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 6, pp. 1–50, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fielder, M., andPtak, V.,On Matrices with Nonpositive Off-Diagonal Elements and Positive Principal Minors, Czechoslovak Mathematics Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 382–400, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murty, K. G.,On the Number of Solutions to the Complementarity Problem and Spanning Properties of Complementarity Cones, Linear Algebra and Applications, Vol. 5, pp. 65–108, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mangasarian, O. L.,Nonlinear Programming, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, Y. C.,Iterative Methods for Solving Linear Complementarity and Linear Programming Problems, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, PhD Thesis, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ortega, J. M.,Numerical Analysis: A Second Course, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Poljak, B. T.,On a Sharp Minimum, University of Wisconsin, Mathematics Research Center, Seminar, 1980.

  12. Mangasarian, O. L., andMeyer, R. R.,Nonlinear Perturbation of Linear Programs, SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, Vol. 17, pp. 745–752, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by O. L. Mangasarian

This work is based on the author's PhD Dissertation, which was supported by NSF Grant No. MCS-79-01066 at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

The author would like to thank Professor O. L. Mangasarian for his guidance of the dissertation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, Y.C. On the gradient-projection method for solving the nonsymmetric linear complementarity problem. J Optim Theory Appl 43, 527–541 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00935004

Key Words

Navigation