Skip to main content

The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix

Summary

In a randomised study of cervical smears after conization, the efficacy of the combined wooden spatula and cytobrush was compared with that of the combined wooden spatula and cotton swab. The conization technique involved a could knife and two Sturmdorf sutures. A total of 75 women participated, 57 had smears taken with both methods. Eigtheen with only one of the methods. Out of 66 taken with a wooden spatula and a cytobrush. 48 (72.7%) contained endocervical cells and 53 (80.3%) contained either endocervical or metaplastic cells. Out of 66 smears taken with a wooden spatula and a cotton swab, only 25 (37.9%) contained endocervical cells and 40 (60.6%) contained endocervical or metaplastic cells. Both differences were significant (P<0.001 andP<0.05, respectively). The combined use of a wooden spatula and cytobrush is recommended for cytological smears after conization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Ahlgren M, Ingemarsson I, Lindberg LG, Nordqvist RSB (1975) Conization as treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol 46:135–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerre B, Eliasson G, Linell F, Söderberg H, Sjöberg N-O (1976) Conization as only treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol 125:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelar JJM, Rietveld-Scheffers PEM (1986) Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and cytobrush samping for cervical cytology. Acta Cytol 30:264–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1981) Cone biopsy of the cervix. Lancet II:400–402

  • Gondos B, Marshall DCT, Ostergard DR (1972) Endocervical cells in cervical smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114:833–834

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad P, Klem V (1976) Long term follow-up of 1121 cases of carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol 48:125–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trimbos JB, Heintz APM, Van Hall EV (1983) Reliability of cytological follow-up after conization of the cervix; a comparison of three surgical techniques. Br J Obstet Gynecol 90:1141–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimbos JB, Arentz NPW (1986) The efficiency of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears. Acta Cytol 30:261–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kristensen, G.B., Jensen, L.K., Ejersbo, D. et al. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix. Arch Gynecol Obstet 246, 207–210 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934520

Key words

  • Cervix dysplasia
  • Vaginal smears
  • Diagnosis
  • Pathology