Skip to main content
Log in

Antigenic differences betweenTrichinella spiralis andT. pseudospiralis detected by monoclonal antibodies

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antigenic differences betweenTrichinella spiralis andT. pseudospiralis were established using two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that show different specificities to muscle larvae of the two variants. Enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed that mAb 3G6 reacts positively againstT. spiralis, T. nelsoni, T. nativa andT. pseudospiralis, whereas mAb 3E10 does not react withT. pseudospiralis under the same experimental conditions. These antigenic differences were confirmed after preabsorption of the antibodies with serial dilutions of extracts ofT. spiralis orT. pseudospiralis muscle larvae. The indirect immunofluorescence technique showed that the antigen corresponding to mAb 3G6 is located in the stichosomes and the cuticle surface of bothT. spiralis andT. pseudospiralis. In contrast, mAb 3E10 positively stained cryostat sections ofT. spiralis, forming a dense reaction product on the surface of the whole larvae and the surrounding capsule. This antibody can be quite useful as a specific probe for distinguishingT. spiralis fromT. pseudospiralis in taxonomic studies. Using an avidin-biotin system, we could prove that mAb 3G6 recognizes an excretory/secretory-type antigen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond NM, McLaren DJ, Parkhouse RME (1986) A comparison of the surface and secretions ofTrichinella spiralis pseudospiralis andT. spiralis. Immunology 93:163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Boev SN, Britov VA, Orlov IV (1979) Species composition of Trichinellae. Wiad Parazytol 25:495–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Boszon K, Hadas E, Szelag K (1976) Enzyme and protein patterns ofT. spiralis andT. pseudospiralis larvae. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Trichinellosis, Poznan, Poland Aug 26–28th

  • Despommier DD (1975) Adaptive changes in muscle fibres infected withTrichinella spiralis. Am J Pathol 78:477–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Efremov EE, Ermolin GA (1980) Bio- and immunochemical analysis of specific differences betweenT. spiralis anT. pseudospiralis. Proceedings, 5th International Conference on Trichinellosis 28, Noordwik ann Zee, The Netherlands, Sept 2–4

  • Gamble HR (1985)Trichinella spiralis: immunization of mice using monoclonal antibody affinity isolated antigens. Exp Parasitol 59:398–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Garkavi BL (1972) Procyon lotorTrichinella. Proceedings of the All Union Conference on Problems of Man and Animals. Vilnius, Moscow, pp 53–55 (in Russian)

  • Gustowka L, Ruitenberg EJ, Elgersma A (1980) Cellular reactions in tongue and gut with a hormone of high specific activity. Nature 194:495–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulinska D, Shaikenov B (1980) Scanning electron microscopic studies on developmental adult stages of fourTrichinella spiralis. Augew Parasitol 21:150–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Komandarev S, Mihov L, Hovorka I (1986) Immunological studies on differentTrichinella species: II. Antigenic characteristics by means of two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis. Helminthology 21:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramar M, Srewart GL, Charniga L (1981) A comparative study ofTrichinella spiralis (Owen 1835) andTrichinella pseudospiralis (Garkavi 1972). J Parasitol 67:911–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyurkchiev S, Surneva-Nakova TS, Ivanova M, Nakov L, Dimitrova E (1988) Monoclonal antibodies to porcine zona pellucida that block the initial stages of fertilization. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 18:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenfels JR, Murrel KD, Pillit PA (1983) Comparison of three subspecies ofT. spiralis by scanning electron microscopy. Parasitology 69:1131–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren DJ, Ortega-Pierres G, Parkhouse PME (1987)Trichinella spiralis: immunocytochemical localization of surface and intracellular antigens using monoclonal antibody probes. Parasitology 94:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Pierres G, Chayen A, Clark NT, Parkhouse RME (1984) The occurrence of antibodies to hidden and exposed determinants of surface antigens ofTrichinella spiralis. Parasitology 83:359–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmas C, Wakelin D, Cabaj W (1985) Immune response toT. spiralis andT. pseudospiralis in mice. Int J Parasitol 15:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein DS, Despommier DD (1984) Antigens fromTrichimella spiralis that induce a protective response in the mouse. J Immunol 132:898–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamenova M, Kehayov I, Kyurkchiev S, Despodova TS (1990) Production and application of monoclona antibody specific to human chorionic gonadotropin. Folia Biol (Praha) 36:81–90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kehayov, I., Tankov, C., Komandarev, S. et al. Antigenic differences betweenTrichinella spiralis andT. pseudospiralis detected by monoclonal antibodies. Parasitol Res 77, 72–76 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934389

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934389

Keywords

Navigation