Skip to main content
Log in

Probability dominance in random outcomes

  • Contributed Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intuitively appealing “probability dominance” relation for random outcomes is defined and investigated. Its properties, strengths, and weaknesses relative to stochastic dominance and meanvariance dominance are studied. It is shown that the proposed probability dominance complements existing solution concepts and strengthens one's confidence in decision making under uncertainty. Fundamental characteristics of nondominated random payoffs and methods for identifying them, for both general and specific classes, are reported. Application pitfalls and possible extensions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fishburn, P. C.,Utility Theory for Decision Making, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brumelle, S. L., andVickson, R. G.,A Unified Approach to Stochastic Dominance, Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Edited by W. T. Ziemba and R. G. Vickson, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P. C.,Stochastic Dominance without Transitive Preferences, Management Science, Vol. 24, pp. 1268–1277, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P. C.,Stochastic Dominance: Theory and Application, The Role and Effectiveness of Theories of Decision in Practice, Edited by D. J. White and K. C. Bowen, Hodder and Stoughton, London, England, pp. 60–72, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanoch, G., andLevy, H.,The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36, pp. 335–346, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Markowitz, H. M.,Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, Vol. 6, pp. 77–91, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes, A., andCooper, W. W.,Chance-Constrained Programming, Management Science, Vol. 6, pp. 73–79, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, H. A.,Administrative Behavior, The Macmillan Company, New York, New York, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, P. L.,Behavior Bases and Habitual Domains of Human Decision/Behavior—Concepts and Applications, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making—Theory and Application, Edited by G. Fandel and T. Gal, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pitman, E. J. G.,The Closest Estimates of Statistical Parameters, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 33, pp. 212–222, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Savage, L. J.,The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wrather, C.,A Model of the General Bargaining Interaction with Application to Buyer/Seller Bargaining, PhD Dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Libby, R., andFishburn, P. C.,Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decision: A Survey and Evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 15, pp. 272–292, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blyth, C. R.,Some Probability Paradoxes in Choice from among Random Alternatives, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 67, pp. 366–373, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wrather, C., Yu, P.L. Probability dominance in random outcomes. J Optim Theory Appl 36, 315–334 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934350

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934350

Key Words

Navigation