Advertisement

Isolation and characterization of variants ofRhizobium leguminosarum bvphaseoli

  • J. Rodriguez
  • J. R. Jardim Freire
  • I. Schrank
Research Papers

Summary

Seven spontaneous variants ofR. leguminosarum byphaseoli were isolated from three stock cultures by their diversity in colony morphology. Five variants had small opaque or translucent colonies and two variants, large gummy colonies. There were marked differences between strains, but not between variants of the same strain, in the utilization of carbon sources. The large gummy colony variants were more tolerant to streptomycin and novobiocin and less effective or ineffective in N2 fixation than the variants of small non-gummy colonies; they were also of higher competitive ability than the other variants from the same strain. At least for one strain, competitiveness seemed less subject to variation.

Keywords

Carbon Source Streptomycin Competitive Ability Culture Stock Colony Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Resumen

A partir de cultivos de referencia, y debido a la diversidad morfológico de sus colonias, se aislaron siete variantes espontaneas deR. leguminosarum bvphaseoli. Cinco de las variantes presentaron colonias pequeñas, opacas o traslucidas. Las colonias de las otras dos variantes eran grandes y de aspecto gomoso. En la utilización de fuentes de carbono se observaron diferencias marcadas entre distintas cepas pero no entre variantes de la misma cepa. Las colonias grandes y de aspecto gomoso eran más tolerantes a la estreptomicina y a la novobiocina, menos eficaces que las variantes de colonias pequeñas en cuanto a la fijación de N2, y mostraron además una mayor habilidad competitiva frente a las otras variantes de la misma cepa. Al menos en una de las cepas la competitividad estaba menos sujeta a variaciones.

Résumé

Sept variants spontanés deR. leguminosarum bvphaseoli ont été isolés à partir de trois cultures stock sur la base de la diversité de la morphologie de leurs colonies. Cinq variants se présentaient en colonies petites, opaques à translucides, trandis que deux variants se présentaient en grandes colonies visqueuses. Il y avait des différences marquées entre souches mais pas entre variants de la même souche, quant à l'utilisation de sources carbonées. Les variants se présentant en grandes colonies visqueuses étaient plus tolérants à la streptomycine et à la novobiocine et moins efficaces voire inefficaces pour la fixation de l'N2, que les variants des petites colonies non visqueuses; elles présentaient aussi une capacité de compétition plus élevée que les autres variants de la même souche. Au moins pour une souche, la capacité de compétition semblait moins sujette à variation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, E.K. &Allen, O.N. 1950 Biochemical and symbiotic properties of the rhizobia.Bacteriological Reviews 14, 273–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bushby, H.V.A. 1982 Direct quantitative recovery ofRhizobium from soil and rhizosphere. InNitrogen Fixation in Legumes, ed. Vincent, J.M. pp. 59–67. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, M.A. &Elkan, G.H. 1973 Transmissible resistance to penicillin G, neomycin and chloramphenicol inRhizobium japonicum.Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 4, 248–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Djordjevic, M.A., Zurkowski, W. &Rolfe, B.G. 1982 Plasmids and stability of symbiotic properties ofRhizobium trifolii.Journal of Bacteriology 151, 560–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagedorn, C. 1979 Relationship of antibiotic resistance to effectiveness inRhizobium trifolii populations.Soil Science Society of America Journal 43, 921–925.Google Scholar
  6. Herridge, D.F. &Roughley, R.J. 1975 Variation in colony characteristics and symbiotic effectiveness ofRhizobium.Journal of Applied Bacteriology 38, 19–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hubbell, D.H. 1970 Studies on the root hair ‘curling factor’ ofRhizobium.Botanical Gazette 131, 337–342.Google Scholar
  8. Jordan, D.C. 1984 Genus I.Rhizobium. InBergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol. 1, ed. Holt, J.G. & Krieg, N.R. pp. 235–242. London: Williams & Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
  9. Kuykendall, L.D. &Elkan, G.H. 1976Rhizobium japonicum derivatives differing in nitrogen fixing efficiency and carbohydrate utilization.Applied and Environmental Microbiology 32, 511–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. MacGregor, A.N. &Alexander, M. 1971 Formation of tumor-like structures of legume roots byRhizobium.Journal of Bacteriology 105, 728–732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Meyer, M.C. &Pueppke, S.G. 1980 Differentiation ofRhizobium japonicum strain derivatives by antibiotic sensitivity patterns, lectin binding and utilization of biochemicals.Canadian Journal of Microbiology 26, 606–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mulongoy, K. &Elkan, G.H. 1977 Glucose catabolism in two derivatives of aRhizobium japonicum strain differing in nitrogen fixing efficiency.Journal of Bacteriology 131, 179–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pankhurst, C. 1977 Symbiotic effectiveness of antibiotic-resistant mutants of fast and slow-growing strains ofRhizobium nodulatingLotus species.Canadian Journal of Microbiology 23, 1026–1033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sanders, R.E., Carlson, R.W. &Albersheim, P. 1976. ARhizobium mutant incapable of nodulation and normal polysaccharide secretion.Nature (London) 271, 240–242.Google Scholar
  15. Santos, D.S. &Affonso, M.H.T. 1982I o Curso avançado sobre biologia molecular de plasmideos bacterianos. 57 pp. São Paulo: Guia de trabalhos practicos, Escola Paulista de Medicina.Google Scholar
  16. Schwinghamer, E.A. 1962 Studies on induced variation in the rhizobia. III. Host range modification ofRhizobium trifolii by spontaneous and radiation induced mutation.American Journal of Botany 49, 269–277.Google Scholar
  17. Schwinghamer, E.A. 1970 Current studies at Canberra on auxotrophic mutants and on antibiosis inRhizobium.Rhizobium Newsletter 15, 37–39.Google Scholar
  18. Smibert, R.M. &Krieg, N.R. 1981 General characterization. InManual of Methods for General Bacteriology, ed. Gernardt, P. pp. 409–443. Washington: American Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
  19. Upchurch, R.G. &Elkan, G.H. 1977 Comparison of colony morphology, salt tolerance and effectiveness inRhizobium japonicum.Canadian Journal of Microbiology 23, 1118–1122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vincent, J.M. 1962 Australian studies of the root-nodule bacteria.Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 87, 8–10.Google Scholar
  21. Vincent, J.M. 1970A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule Bacteria. IBP Handbook No. 15. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Vincent, J.M., Nutman, P.S. &Skinner, F.A. 1979 The identification and classification ofRhizobium. InIdentification Methods for Microbiologists (2nd edn), ed. Skinner, F.A. & Lovelock, D.W.. Society for Applied Bacteriology Technical Series No. 14 pp. 49–69. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Weaver, R.W. &Frederick, L. 1972 A new technique for the most probable number counts of rhizobia.Plant and Soil 36, 219–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oxford University Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Rodriguez
    • 1
  • J. R. Jardim Freire
    • 2
  • I. Schrank
    • 3
  1. 1.Escuela Nacional de Ciencia BiologicasI.P.N.Mexico
  2. 2.Departamento de SolosFaculdade de Agronomia da UFRGSPorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Centro de BiotecnologiaUFRGSPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations