Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 80, Issue 6, pp 517–522 | Cite as

The reservosomes of epimastigote forms ofTrypanosoma cruzi: occurrence during in vitro cultivation

  • Regina C. B. Q. Figueiredo
  • Mário Steindel
  • Maurilio J. Soares
Original Paper

Abstract

Reservosomes are large membrane-bound structures found mainly at the posterior end of epimastigote forms ofTrypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas' disease. We screened 5-day-old culture forms of the following strains at the ultrastructural level for the presence of reservosomes:T. cruzi strains Y and YuYu as well asTrypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) spp. strains M431, M504, and M519 isolated from bats (Epitesicus sp.) in Santa Catarina, Brazil. The organelles could be found in all strains analyzed, supporting a previous hypothesis that they are a marker of trypanosomes of theSchizotrypanum subgenus. Stereological analysis was carried out with the Y strain to follow the development of reservosomes and lipid droplets during in vitro cultivation of the parasites. Reservosomes were partitioned to the daughter cells during cell division such that the organelles were present in newly formed parasites. Estimation of the volume density after 3, 5, 7, 9, and 12 days of cultivation showed that it was lower in younger cultures, becoming maximal at day 9 (8.0%), but decreased in older cultures (5.9% at day 12). Morphological changes also occurred: type I reservosomes presented an electron-dense matrix with lipid droplets and were characteristic of younger cultures, whereas type II reservosomes presented a homogeneous matrix without lipid inclusions and predominated in older cultures. These organelles were absent in bloodstream trypomastigote forms isolated from infected mice. Lipid inclusions were found in larger numbers at the 3rd and 12th days of culture, but their volume density was lower at the log phase of growth.

Keywords

Lipid Lipid Droplet Daughter Cell Infected Mouse Volume Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boehringer S, Hecker H (1974) Quantitative ultrastructural differences between strains ofTrypanosoma brucei subgroup during transformation in blood. J Protozool 21: 694–698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cáceres O, Fernandes JF (1976) Glucose metabolism, growth and differentiation ofTrypanosoma cruzi. Rev Bras Biol 36: 397–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Camargo EP (1964) Growth and differentiation inTrypanosoma cruzi. I. Origin of metacyclic trypanosomes in liquid media. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 6: 93–100Google Scholar
  4. Contreras VT, Salles JM, Thomaz N, Morel CM, Goldenberg S (1985) In vitro differentiation ofTrypanosoma cruzi under chemically defined conditions. Mol Biochem Parasitol 16: 315–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Souza W (1989) Components of the cell surface of trypanosomatids. Prog Protistol 3: 87–184Google Scholar
  6. De Souza W, Carvalho TU, Benchimol M, Chiari E (1978)Trypanosoma cruzi: ultrastructural, cytochemical and freeze-fracture studies of protein uptake. Exp Parasitol 45: 101–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Filardi LS, Brener Z (1987) Susceptibility and natural resistance ofTrypanosoma cruzi strains to drugs used clinically in Chagas' disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 81: 755–759PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Meirelles MNSL, Barbosa HS, De Souza W, Araújo-Jorge TC (1984) Recent contributions for a better understanding of theTrypanosoma cruzi-muscle cell interaction. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 79: 7–11Google Scholar
  9. Paulin JJ, White R Jr, Agosin M (1983) Ultrastructural modifications during the metabolism of metronidazole byTrypanosoma cruzi. J Submicrosc Cytol 15: 951–964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rogerson GW, Gutteridge WE (1980) Catabolic metabolism inTrypanosoma cruzi. Int J Parasitol 11: 131–135Google Scholar
  11. Silva LHP, Nussenzweig V (1953) Sobre uma cepa deTrypanosoma cruzi altamente virulenta para o camundongo branco. Folia Clin Biol 20: 191–207Google Scholar
  12. Soares MJ, De Souza W (1988) Cytoplasmic organelles of trypanosomatids: a cytochemical and stereological study. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 20: 349–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Soares MJ, De Souza W (1991) Endocytosis of gold-labeled proteins and LDL byTrypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol Res 77: 461–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Soares MJ, Souto-Padrón T, Bonaldo M, Goldenberg S, De Souza W (1989) A stereological study of the differentiation process inTrypanosoma cruzi. Parasitol Res 75: 522–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Soares MJ, Souto-Padrón T, De Souza W (1992) Identification of a large pre-lysosomal compartment in the pathogenic protozoonTrypanosoma cruzi. J Cell Sci 102: 157–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Steindel M, Grisard E, Carvalho Pinto JC, Ribeiro-Rodrigues R, Romanha AJ (1990) Preliminary characterization ofTrypanosoma sp. isolated from bats (Epitesicus sp.) from Santa Catarina island, Santa Catarina state. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 85 [Suppl I]:138Google Scholar
  17. Weibel ER (1979) Stereological Methods. Vol. 1: Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina C. B. Q. Figueiredo
    • 1
  • Mário Steindel
    • 2
  • Maurilio J. Soares
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ultra-estrutura e Biologia CelularInstituto Oswaldo Cruz/FIOCRUZRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Microbiologia e ParasitologiaUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations