Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Refixation of muscular insertions after endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus

  • Current Problem Cases
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We describe the refixation of muscle insertions after resection of the proximal humerus in tumor patients. The prosthesis specially designed for this purpose carries large drill holes in the places corresponding to the anatomical sites of the muscle insertions. The muscles are attached to the prosthesis by means of tendon strips from the fascia lata. This can be expected to produce better functional results and to prevent subluxation.

Zusammenfassung

Die Refixation von Muskelansätzen nach Resektion des proximalen Humerus bei Tumorpatienten wird beschrieben. Eine speziell dafür konstruierte Endoprothese ist an den analogen Stellen der Muskelinsertion mit weiten Bohrungen versehen. Mittels Sehenstreifen der Fascia lata werden die Muskeln an der Prothese fixiert. Dadurch sind bessere funktionelle Ergebnisse und die Verhinderung von Subluxationen zu erwarten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ascherl R, Rechl H, Erhard W, Schmeller ML, Geißdörfer K, Rupp G, Senekowitsch R, Kriegel H, Blümel G (1983) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Einheilung zementfreier Schaftendoprothesen mit sogenannter madreporischer Oberfläche. Neue Aspekte der Traumatologie. Bericht über die wissenschaftliche Arbeitstagung, Baden bei Wien. 21.–22.10. Schattauer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bos G, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Shives TC, Rock M, Askew L, Chao EYS (1987) Prosthetic proximal humeral replacement: the Mayo Clinic experience. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculosceletal oncology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burri C, Gerngroß H, Kinzl L (1983) Durability of isoelastic tumor prostheses of the shoulder. In: Kotz R (ed) Proc 2nd Intern. Workshop on the Design and Application of Tumor Prostheses for Bone and Joint Reconstruction. Vienna, September 5–8, pp 245–248

  4. Capanna R, Van Horn JR, Biagini R, Ruggieri P, Bettelli G, Sola G, Campanacci M (1986) A humeral modular prosthesis for bone tumour surgery. A study of 56 cases. Int Orthop (SICOT) 10:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gebhardt MC, McGuire MH, Mankin HJ (1987) Resection and allograft arthrodesis for malignant bone tumors of the extremity. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 567–582

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotz R (1983) Possibilities and limitations of limb-preserving therapy for bone tumors today. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol [Suppl] 106:68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathys R (1973) Stand der Verwendung von Kunststoffen für künstliche Gelenke. Aktuel Traumatol 3:253

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rock M (1987) Intercalary allograft and custom neer prosthesis after en bloc resection of the proximal humerus. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 586–597

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ross AC, Wilson JN, Scales JT (1987) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:656–661

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ross AC, Wilson JN, Sneath RS, Scales JT (1987) Humeral replacement. In: Coombs R, Friedlaender G (eds) Bone tumor management. Butterworths, London pp 151–159

    Google Scholar 

  11. Russe W, Bauer R (1983) The isoelastic humerus prosthesis as a replacement of the proximal humerus after tumor resections. In: Kotz R (ed) Proc. 2nd Intern. Workshop on the Design and Application of Tumor Prostheses for Bone and Joint Reconstruction. Vienna, September 5–8, pp 249–251

  12. Salzer M, Locke H, Engelhardt H, Zweymüller K (1975) Keramische Endoprothesen der oberen Extremität. Z Orthop 113:458–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salzer M, Knahr K, Locke H, Stärk N, Matejovsky Z, Plenk H Jr, Punzet G, Zweymüller K (1979) A bioceramic endoprosthesis for the replacement of the proximal humerus. Arth Orthop Trauma Surg 93:169–184

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sekera J, Ramach W, Pongracz N, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Kotz R, Knahr K, Salzer M (1987) Experience with ceramic and metal implants for the proximal humerus in cases of malignant bone tumor. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 211–215

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen TH, Sim FH, Shives TC, Pritchard DJ, Chao EYS (1987) Porous-coated segmental bone and joint replacement prostheses. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh pp 73–83

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ungethüm M, Knahr K, Salzer M, Blömer W (1983) Zementfrei zu implantierende Spezialendoprothesen nach dem Baukastenprinzip für den proximalen Femur- und Humerusersatz. Med Orthop Tech 4:104–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritschl, P., Piza-Katzer, H., Pechmann, U. et al. Refixation of muscular insertions after endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108, 386–389 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932453

Keywords

Navigation