Skip to main content
Log in

Acetabular cup-siting device for total hip arthroplasty

  • Clinical and Experimental Forum
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A method for improving acetabular cup positioning at arthroplasty is introduced. The anatomic and engineering principles involved are explained. The device used for this method of siting is described. The method was tested in cadaver experiments and resulted in a 380% improvement of anteversion-retroversion position and a 370% improvement in abduction position over conventional siting. The value of this method in conventional and revision arthroplasty is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Charnley J (1979) Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip, theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 186–289

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coventry MB (1985) Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67: 832

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eftekhar NS (1976) Dislocation and instability complicating low-friction arthroplasty of the hip joint. Clin Orthop 121: 120

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser GA, Wroblenski BM (1981) Revision of the Charnley; low-friction arthroplasty for recurrent or irreducible dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 63: 552

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 64: 17

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kristiansen B, Jorgensen L, Holmich P (1985) Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103: 375

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60: 217

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindberg HO, Carlsson AS, Gentz CF, Petterson H (1982) Recurrent and nonrecurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 53: 947

    Google Scholar 

  9. Romanes GJ; Cunningham's textbook of anatomy, 11th edn. Oxford University Press, London, p 174

  10. Ritter MA (1976) Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121: 92

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salvati ED, Im UC, Aglietti P, Wilson PD (1976) Radiology of total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 121: 74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Searadge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ (1982) Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop 166: 152

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE (1982) A ten-year-follow-up of the hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64: 970

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woo RYG, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 1295

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O'Gorman TW (1988) Total hip acetabular component positioning affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop 228: 79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the Arthritis Foundation of Ireland, 1 Sydney Parade Avenue, Dublin 4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doyle, J., Murray, P., Mahony, P.O. et al. Acetabular cup-siting device for total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108, 317–321 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932323

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932323

Keywords

Navigation